[ad_1]
The third remake of a clbadic Disney movie this year – which is falling behind Dumbo less performing, and of another more successful Aladdin – The Lion King ] was always going to be a delicate prospect. The most profitable movie of Disney's clbadic animated clbadics (the total of its box office revenue amounts to $ 968 million – which is not bad for a movie released there is 25 years). The original is without a doubt the most appreciated film of the Disney Renaissance. time.
So, how exactly do you remake The Lion King ? Well, the answer of director Jon Favreau (who has been hugely successful with his adaptation of The Jungle Book a few years ago) and his team is to take the "if it is not". is not broken, do not repair that "approach. The Lion King 2019 is closer to its source material than any other update from Disney until now – the action is very close at once, with huge script strips reported in extenso and songs only (see reference in a particularly well-informed gag).
As one would expect from this description, The story traces the adventures of the young lion cub Simba (JD McCrary) – the son of the wise ruler Mufasa (James Earl Jones back) and his heir to the kingdom of Pride Rock. Simba's bitter uncle, Scar (Chiwetel Ejiofor) promulgated a plan to seize From the throne, an adult Simba (Donald Glover) faces a difficult choice: to settle in a life without worries of exile, or face his demons and return home. fight for the legacy of his father.
This rhythmic typing technique is likely to be an advantage for fans who do not want to see the original masterpiece tampered with excessively. But it is also the biggest weakness of the film. You end up regaining one of the greatest animation movies of all time – a fun, engaging and often exciting story that accompanies a huge side of over-family and d & # 39; An underlying feeling of "what's the point? At best, it's probably better to go as in a performance of the hit show: get ready for a story you already know and love, tell it with new tools.
And these are the new tools that really are. the aces in the sleeve of Favreau. This is not technically a remake of "real action", but it does not seem that far. There is here a revolutionary artistic level that gives the impression of a leap forward for animation in CG images: the animal characters are rendered with amazing depth and texture, while the (mostly) recreated African savannah places are photo-real you'd be hard-pressed to notice the difference between this and a high definition doc from Attenborough
Look under this new gloss varnish, and you'll discover a story which looks a lot like the original. but he lacks a good deal of his energy and personality. Certainly, it is difficult to improve a film that many consider almost perfect. But although this version lasts half an hour longer, nothing seems to be particularly improved or even new, except for a new song, "Spirit", sung by Beyoncé (who plays the adult version of Simba's companion, Nala). superimposed on the action rather than being interpreted as a musical number in its own right and do not quite live up to the original – and perfectly sung – compositions of Elton John and Tim Rice.
do their best, but they are paralyzed by the nature of the screenplay, the ominous shadows of some of the iconic vocal turns of version 94, and the slightly less anthropomorphic expressions of their animal equivalents. Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen, respectively meerkat Timon and Warthog Pumbaa, are the artists who best tackle this challenge. Favreau wisely amplifies the actors' spiritual rapport and sense of improvisation, which means that Simba's friendly friends are the two characters allowed to come out of the book and, as before, generate most of the film's laughter. The accessories also go to Ejiofor, whose deliciously misleading trick allows Scar to add even more layers to the villain of the story (formerly expressed in a memorable way by Jeremy Irons). The Lion King is always nice – especially for those new to history – and his breathtaking visual achievements are worth celebrating. But for all who have seen and loved the original animation, it inevitably suffers by comparison – mainly because it sticks and therefore to its source. In simple terms, if you suffer from fatigue, it will look less like a circle of life than a Disney chasing its tail. But if you are more "Hakuna Matata", you will probably have a good time.
Source link
