[ad_1]
<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "
" Shazam! "
Warner Bros.
As of the date of this publication, Warner Bros. Shazam !, we have won $ 56.825 million (including $ 3.3 million in previews at the time of publication. nationally) and $ 159 million worldwide (of which $ 13.5 million is in IMAX alone), which is less than what we are accustomed to when it comes to wholesale 'comic book super book movies because it is closer to Fri-Sun frames posted by (unadjusted for inflation) The Wolverine ($ 53 million in 2013), Ant-Man ($ 58 million 2015) and Green Lantern ($ 53 million in 2011.) In fact, in terms of DC or Marvel superhero properties, it is the lowest launcher Fri-Sun since Fantastic Four (25 million USD) in 2015. But here is the kickoff: the release of New Line Cinema n & # 3 It cost $ 90 million to produce and, because of the nature of the property, it can be described as DC Films' big work.
Fortunately, we had very a few people who claimed that the beginnings were disappointing or that their absence was simply based on the gross number. A surprisingly large number of people claimed that the launch of $ 72 million by Aquaman was again disappointing, as it was well below that of Wonder Woman (103.5 million dollars in 2017) and Man of Steel ($ 128 million in 2013), seemingly indifferent to the operation of the window of the Christmas season. $ 1.1 billion in the world later, they may have learned their lesson. It should be noted that Ant-Man finally reached 519 million dollars worldwide with a budget of 130 million dollars, while The Wolverine earned 412 million dollars in the world with 130 million dollars, the second largest gross profit of The X-Men film of the time
Yes, & nbsp; Shazam! stumbled across China, earning $ 31 million on a $ 15.9 million opening day. If it looks like Batman v Superman (1.76 times its $ 54 million launch), it will end with $ 51 million. No law says that China must like all the big Hollywood marquees and no law says that big players who succeed must score points in China. China is often less successful and more steroid to inflate the total of films that are already successful. Aquaman and Transformers: The Dark of the Moon Both Reached $ 1.1 Billion Worldwide Through a Trip of Less Than $ 300 Million in China, but Both Big budget movies would have consistently surpbaded the global 850 million USD without a penny from China. The fantasy led by David F. Sandberg is cheap enough to require no rescue from China.
Say What You Want About Ensemble Movies ( Batman v Superman Suicide Squad and Justice League ), but DC Movies Beats now 1,000 on the last three solo superhero movies. Add the Man of Steel which was less successful ($ 668 million in 2013 with mixed reviews and a paid series up front) and still hit 0.75. This is not quite an apple, but the first four films of the MCU were Iron Man (yes!), Incredible Hulk (boo!), Iron Man 2 (eh …), and Thor (yes!). In addition, the MCU began when the $ 449 million dedicated to Thor made it the greatest comic book superhero movie of all time without Batman, Spider-Man, Iron Man or Wolverine. Captain America: The First Avenger could be a big hit with $ 371 million worldwide on a $ 140 million budget.
Assuming that he has suitable halfway legs here and abroad (it will be opened in Japan on April 19), the film marks a turning point for the DC Films brand. Shazam! opened with 159 million US dollars worldwide, while relying on a B-level character (or C?) And that he lacked a lot of star power "butts in the seats". The opening was above $ 45 million, to the point where it must be badumed that critics were extremely positive (91% freshness and 7.2 / 10 on Rotten Tomatoes ) and projections to the listening and stealth moved the needle. In addition, and this is essential, the release of this weekend is the third consecutive film of super movies super solo movies DC Films. After Wonder Woman and Aquaman I Argued Shazam! outperformed BECAUSE it was a DC Films movie.
It's not quite Guardians of the galaxy opening at $ 94 million while it was an MCU movie based on mostly unknown characters , sorts. Shazam! is the third consecutive success of DC Films not based on any of its A-level characters (IE – Batman and Superman), but on less popular and riskier superheroes (stereotypically). Movie lovers who may not have entered the room as fans of the characters are supporters of Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman, Jason Momoa's Aquaman and Zachary Levi's Shazam, respectively, with the desire to see more adventures with these specific versions of DC Comics characters. If Dwayne Johnson really appears as Black Adam in Shazam 2 he will not need to be Viagra franchise.
Shazam! shows once again that DC Films can make superhero movies that appeal to crowds and critical success in a variety of genres and scales in terms of budget and reach. Assuming its opening weekend results in a worldwide spend of nearly $ 450 million ($ 350 million) (which would be fine), this will show that the brand is in a place where the properties of super Unconventional heroes can have a huge impact precisely because they are part of the market. DC Universe Movies. There is no reason for Warner Bros. to rely excessively on Batman, no reason for us, in the media or social media, to guess DC Films as evidence, and no excuse for not giving us a chimpanzee detective. movie.
">
As of the date of this publication, Warner Bros. ' Shazam! generated $ 56.825 million in national revenues (including $ 3.3 million in previews nationally) and $ 159 million worldwide (including $ 13.5 million for the IMAX alone). Yes, it's an opening lower than the one we're used to when it comes to the "big" comics superhero movies because it's closer to the Fri-Sun frames displayed by (unadjusted in inflation function) Wolverine ($ 53 million in 2013), Ant-Man ($ 58 million in 2015) and Green Lantern ($ 53 million in 2011). In fact, in terms of properties of DC superheroes or Marvel, it is the lowest launch between Friday and Sunday since Fantastic Four ($ 25 million) in 2015. But here is the kickoff: the release of New Line Cinema only cost $ 90 million. and, due to the nature of the property, it could be considered the biggest turning point of DC Films.
Fortunately, we have had very few people who say that the beginnings were disappointing or that the failures were simply based on the raw numbers. A surprisingly large number of people claimed that the launch of $ 72 million by Aquaman was again disappointing, as it was well below that of Wonder Woman (103.5 million dollars in 2017) and Man of Steel ($ 128 million in 2013), seemingly indifferent to the operation of the window of the Christmas season. $ 1.1 billion in the world later, they may have learned their lesson. It should be noted that Ant-Man finally reached 519 million dollars worldwide with a budget of 130 million dollars, while The Wolverine earned 412 million dollars in the world with $ 130 million, the second largest gross profit of The X-Men movie of the time
Yes, Shazam! stumbled across China, earning $ 31 million on a $ 15.9 million opening day. If it looks like Batman v Superman (1.76 times its $ 54 million launch), it will end with $ 51 million. No law says that China must like all the big Hollywood marquees and no law says that big players who succeed must score points in China. China is often less successful and more steroid to inflate the total of films that are already successful. Aquaman and Transformers: The Dark of the Moon Both Reached $ 1.1 Billion Worldwide Through a Trip of Less Than $ 300 Million in China, but Both Big budget movies would have consistently surpbaded the global 850 million USD without a penny from China. The fantasy led by David F. Sandberg is cheap enough to require no rescue from China.
Say what you want about microgerated ensemble films ( Batman v Superman Suicide Squad and Justice League ), but DC Movies now beats 1,000 during the last three solo superhero movies. Add the Man of Steel which was less successful ($ 668 million in 2013 with mixed reviews and a paid series up front) and still hit 0.75. These are not really apples with apples, but the first four solo films of the MCU were Iron Man (yes!), Incredible Hulk (boo!), ] Iron Man 2 (eh …), and Thor (yes!). In addition, the MCU began when the $ 449 million dedicated to Thor made it the greatest comic book superhero movie of all time without Batman, Spider-Man, Iron Man or Wolverine. Captain America: The First Avenger could be a big hit with $ 371 million worldwide on a $ 140 million budget.
Assuming that he has suitable halfway legs here and abroad (it will be opened in Japan on April 19), the film marks a turning point for the DC Films brand. Shazam! opened with 159 million US dollars worldwide, while relying on a B-level character (or C?) And that he lacked a lot of star power "butts in the seats". The opening was above $ 45 million, to the point where it must be badumed that critics were extremely positive (91% freshness and 7.2 / 10 on Rotten Tomatoes ) and projections to the listening and stealth moved the needle. In addition, and this is essential, the release of this weekend is the third consecutive film of super movies super solo movies DC Films. After Wonder Woman and Aquaman I Argued Shazam! outperformed BECAUSE it was a DC Films movie.
It's not quite Guardians of the Galaxy that starts with $ 94 million while it's an MCU movie based on mostly unknown characters, but it is always a big criterion of sorting. Shazam! is the third consecutive success of DC Films not based on any of its A-level characters (IE – Batman and Superman), but on less popular and riskier superheroes (stereotypically). Movie lovers who may not have entered the room as fans of the characters are supporters of Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman, Jason Momoa's Aquaman and Zachary Levi's Shazam, respectively, with the desire to see more adventures with these specific versions of DC Comics characters. If Dwayne Johnson really appears as Black Adam in Shazam 2 he will not need to be Viagra franchise.
Shazam! shows once again that DC Films can make superhero movies that appeal to crowds and critical success in a variety of genres and scales in terms of budget and reach. Assuming its opening weekend results in a worldwide spend of nearly $ 450 million ($ 350 million) (which would be fine), this will show that the brand is in a place where the properties of super Unconventional heroes can have a huge impact precisely because they are part of the market. DC Universe Movies. There is no reason for Warner Bros. to rely excessively on Batman, no reason for us, in the media or social media, to guess DC Films as evidence, and no excuse for not giving us a chimpanzee detective. movie.
