[ad_1]
With Avengers: Endgame in less than two weeks, anticipation continues to grow – at least for those of us who have not soiled their experience by watching a spoiler that has leaked. As theories of the fallout of events appear more and more on the Internet, it is time to step back from the details and ask a larger question.
Now, with nearly a decade of MCU films behind us, what is the ultimate face of Marvel? With several characters to choose from – Thor, Iron Man, Captain America, Spider-Man, etc. – it may be difficult to select a single figure to represent everything that is Marvel.
If you participate in various forums, you will discover a common trend among Marvel enthusiasts regarding this discussion. There is a clear division with two characters coming out at the top: Spider-Man and Iron Man. However, both are cited for different reasons. While we consider that one represents more faithfully the face of wonder in terms of comics (Spider-Man), the other is rather a cinematographic representation of Marvel (Iron-Man).
Fans who claim that Spider-Man is the face of Marvel
With various justifications appearing regarding this designation, it may be difficult to discern the reasoning behind such a decision. However, let's look at some of the important arguments in favor of Spider-Man.
A fan says that when you think of Spider-Man, he's in a clbad of his own, similar to Batman and Superman; In other words, it is not intrinsically linked to the Avengers and thrives as a unique and prosperous entity.
On the other hand, when you think of Iron Man, the fans claim that you immediately badociate it with the other Avengers. This may imply that Iron Man best represents the Avengers, and therefore the center of the MCU, while Spider-Man best represents a stand-alone hero and therefore constitutes a better figurehead for Marvel (since a group of people can not be a single face. ").
Spider-Man also participated in more solo movies than Iron Man, his story having been told several times in a cinematic manner – by Toby Maguire, Andrew Garfield and now Tom Holland. However, as one fan says, with Spider-Man continuing to exist under its own logo, the Marvel brand not being badociated with all these interpretations, it remained its own super, rather than being simply attached to the other heroes of MCU.
While some think that Spider-Man's separation from other heroes of the MCU makes him a prominent figure (since he may exist alone), others claim that it's the exact reason for which he can not be seen as Marvel's face: fans do not even badociate him with the company.
Fans who claim that Iron Man is the face of Marvel
Fans who claim that Iron Man is Marvel's face rely heavily on his cinematic presence. Everyone knows that Spider-Man governs global retail sales ; however Iron Man is responsible for launching the MCU and the entire saga of the Avengers; and so, continued to portray the franchise as a whole, since its first independent film in 2008.
While many fans will agree that Spider-Man is more technically popular, many renounce the title "face of Marvel ". "To Iron Man, after 2008, because of its growing popularity and importance to the franchise since. One fan claims that Iron Man has overturned Spider-Man in terms of popular culture, while comic book lovers still see Spider-Man as the true face of wonder.
If we accept this reasoning, do we base the "Marvel face" on popular culture, or do we rely on the opinions of those who are more related to the Marvel universe? Do comic readers have more weight, and what about comic book readers who always have the feeling that Iron Man comes first (even if there are any) less)? If forced to choose one, it seems that Iron Man deserves the title at this moment. However, that does not mean that with phase four on the horizon, the title will not be made Spider-Man in the near future.
[ad_2]
Source link
