[ad_1]
A "Producers Council" and a public relations group met Monday night in Chennai to decide that "critics who make pathetic / hurtful comments will not be invited to participate in any event. faced with some lawsuits if they exceeded their limits. "This circular comes just a day after a viral video shows Kangana Ranaut intimidating a film journalist for his alleged unpleasant remarks against Manikarnika after that. She was kind enough to let him interview him for 3 hours, then have lunch with him. "Director Sandeep Reddy Vanga interviewed both the QI and QE of female film critics in India for by Kabir Singh "These women have probably never experienced true love," he said in a statement. And how many female critics were uncomfortable with the public's encouragement that Kabir slapped Preeti.
Just a few months ago, the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (or FWICE) called on film critics to "digest the movies" before giving their opinion, considering that bad reviews could affect the trade of film and, consequently, the livelihoods of many technicians.
Nice move _
At a meeting between Council of Producers and Supporting Organizations in Chennai, it was decided that those who critically criticize the cinema and the actors will not be allowed to attend related events At the movie theater. This includes press releases, hits, sound and the launch of the trailer. pic.twitter.com/AqcRGbHolA– Atul Mohan (@atulmohanhere) July 8, 2019
There are more and more problems in the mainstream film industries, where journalists are suddenly considered the first "enemy" for expressing an honest opinion. And to better understand this disease, let's try to understand what the work of a film journalist is. They write about movies, actors, movie-related technicians – and for a large part of that, they depend directly on public relations staff around the film or the actor involved. The PR organizes interviews, briefs journalists on press broadcasts, distributes invitations to press conferences. In short, they control a journalist's access to the film's staff. And unless the reporter complains about the actor / film, access is restricted
. This growing hostility towards "controversial" film journalists runs counter to the very nature of the journalistic profession. It is the job of a journalist to find the larger picture of the impact of a film on the mbades, to ask questions of a celebrity who must account for what she is trying to preach by choosing to to do a certain movie. It's the role of a movie critic to criticize a movie. DO NOT sponsor a filmmaker / actor by narrowing the boundaries of their comments and awarding them a consolation prize. This hostility badumes that a certain category of critics, who do not push a film / actor, want to "damage" their brand or harm the box office of the film. How about good faith? That a person, who does not like a particular celebrity / movie, has armed his critics with a reasonable logic.
Growing up at a time when a select few newspapers and magazines controlled the talk about mainstream films, the current generation of film journalists in India is as "organized" as ever. Where the debate around Kabir Singh is not simply related to the way it presents itself as a film, but also to the impact on the "narrative" of pop culture for the Indian. This is obviously a matter of contention, but pbadionate arguments from both sides are also needed. Such a speech adds much more value than the conspiracy theories on why Rekha never married. Or rumors about the secret mistress of Shah Rukh Khan in a distant land?
Look around you, the major film industries of India. Discussing films through the prism of gender / caste is not tantamount to spreading the "negativity" of a film. Kabir Singh may be overwhelmed by a large number of (scholars) critics, but that did not stop the film from becoming the biggest hit of 2019. Just like all the critics about Uri [Lejingoistede / does not prevent him from becoming the biggest success of Vicky Kaushal's short career. So, is this conversation useless? And for that, you do not have to look beyond the drastic drop of the collections of Thugs of Hindostan of Aamir Khan between the first and the fourth day.
who praise all that is done and go gaga of all that the actors do. If that happens, who will control these film industries? Who will differentiate good from bad, great from good? If industries force these journalists to show bad faith about their film experiences, how will they write about what really motivates them? It may be an idealistic thing to say, but journalists (in general) owe their work only to the truth. Not celebrities, movies or rich producers. Film journalists can not be punished for telling the truth. If this is the case, the alarm tones should ring at the moment.
[ad_2]
Source link
