GMO safety studies and sources of financing
Consult our infographic on GMO safety studies and sources of financing.

This is a partial list of independent projects. studies on genetically modified crops that we have collected under the genetic engineering risk atlas (GENERA). About one-third of genetic engineering risk studies come from independent sources of funding.

  1. Powell M., Wheatley AO, Omoruyi F, Asemota HN, Williams NP, Tennant PF. 2009. Comparative effects of transgenic and conventional papayas on intestinal parameters in rat models. Transgenic Research 19 (3): 511-8.
  2. Batista R, Saibo N, Lourenço T, Oliveira MM. 2008. Microarray badyzes reveal that mutagenesis of plants can induce more transcriptomic changes than the insertion of a transgene. PNAS 105 (9): 3640-5. (full text)
  3. Böhme H., Rudloff E., Schöne F., Schumann W., H. Hüther and Flachowsky G. 2007. Nutritional badessment of genetically modified rapeseed synthesizing large quantities of chain fatty acids average, including pig responses to fattening. . Animal Nutrition Archives 61 (4): 308-16. 2007.
  4. MM Baudo, Lyon R, Powers S, DG Pastori, Edwards KJ, Holdsworth MJ, Shewry PR. 206. Transgenesis has less impact on the wheat grain transcriptome than conventional breeding. Plant biotechnology journal 4 (4): 369-80.
  5. DG Brakes, Thaler R, Evenson DP. 2004. Evaluation of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize on testicular development in mice by two-parameter flow cytometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 52 (7): 2097-2102.
  6. Brake DG, Evenson DP. 2004. A generational study of glyphosate tolerant soybeans on fetal, postnatal, pubertal and adult mouse testis development. Food and chemical toxicology. 42 (1): 29-36.
  7. Atkinson HJ, Johnston KA, Robbins M. 2004. Prima facie evidence that a phytocystatin for the resistance of transgenic plants to nematodes does not present a toxic hazard to the animals. human nutrition. Journal of Nutrition 134 (2): 431-434. (full text)
  8. Bakan B, D Melcion, Richard-Molard D, Cahagnier B. 2002. Fungal growth and Fusarium mycotoxin content in isogenic traditional maize and genetically modified maize grown in France and Spain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50 (4): 728 to 731.
  9. Aulrich K, Böhme H, Daenicke R, Halle I, Flachowsky G. 2001. Genetically Modified Foods in Animal Feeding 1st Communication: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn in the nutrition of poultry, pigs and ruminants. Archiv für Tierernährung (Animal Nutrition Archives) 54 (3): 183 to 1955.
  10. Böhme H, Aulrich K, Daenicke R, Flachowsky G. 2001. Genetically modified foods for use in animal feeding. 2nd communication: glufosinate tolerant sugar beet (roots and silage) and corn kernels for ruminants and pigs. Archiv für Tierernährung (Animal Nutrition Archives) 54 (3): 197-207
  11. Arencibia A, Gentinetta E., E. Cuzzoni, E. Castiglione, A. Kohli, P. Vain, M. Leech, M Christou, P., Christou, P., Sala F., 1998. Molecular badysis of the genome of transgenic rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) produced by particle bombardment or electroporation of intact cells. Molecular Reproduction 4 (2): 99-109.
  12. Bub A, Möseneder J, Wenzel G, Rechkemmer G, Briviba K. 2008. Zeaxanthin is bioavailable from genetically modified zexanthin-rich potatoes. European Journal of Nutrition 47 (2): 99-103.
  13. Catchpole GS, Beckmann M, Enot DP, Mondhe M, Zywicki B, Taylor J, Hardy N, Smith RD, King RD, DB Kell, Fiehn O, Draper J. 2005. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. PNAS 102 (40): 14458-62. (full text) Metabolite badysis and statistical work were funded by the Food Standards Agency (London) under project G02006.
  14. PA Chambers, PS Duggan, Heritage J, Forbes JM. 2000. The fate of antibiotic resistance marker genes in transgenic plant material used for poultry feeding. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 49 (1): 161-164. Novartis, formerly Ciba-Geigy, supplied the genetically modified corn seeds used in this study. This work was funded by a grant from the Food Standards Agency.
  15. Chen ZL, Gu H, Li Y, Su Y, Wu P, Jiang Z, Ming X, Tian J, Pan N, Qu LJ. 2003. Safety badessment of genetically modified sweet pepper and tomato. Toxicology 188 (2-3): 297-307
  16. Cheng KC, Beaulieu J, Iquira E, Belzile FJ, Fortin MG, Strömvik, MV. 2008. The effect of transgenes on the expression of global genes in soybeans lies within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 (9): 3057-67.
  17. EH Chowdhury, Kuribara H., Hino A., Sultana P., Mikami O, Guruge KS, Saito M., Nakajima Y. 2003. Detection of Corn Intrinsic Fragments and DNA and Cry1Ab Protein in Gastrointestinal Content -intestinal pigs fed genetically modified Bt11 corn. Journal of animal science 81 (10): 2546-2551. (full text)
  18. Chowdhury EH, Mikami O, Murata H, Sultana P, Shimada N, Yoshioka M, Guruge KS, Yamamoto S, Miyazaki S, Yamanaka N and Nakajima Y. 2004. Genetic and intrinsic genetic fate of corn veal fed on genetically modified maize Bt11. Journal of Food Protection 67 (2): 365-370.
  19. Chowdhury EH, Shimada N, Murata H, Mikami O, Sultana P, Miyazaki S, Yoshioka M, Yamanaka N, Hirai N, Nakajima Y. (2003). Detection of Cry1Ab protein in gastrointestinal contents, but not in visceral organs of Bt11-fed genetically modified calves. Vet Hum Toxicol. March 2003; 45 (2): 72 and 5.
  20. Chrenkova M, Sommer A, Ceresnakova Z, Nitrayova S, Prostredna M (2002). Nutritional badessment of genetically modified maize grown on rats. Archives of Animal Nutrition-Archiv für Tierernahrung 56: 229-235 Institute of Animal Nutrition, Institute for Research in Animal Production, Hlohovská 2, 949 92 Nitra, Slovak Republic. [email protected]
  21. Cleveland, Thomas E., Patrick F. Dowd, Anne E. Desjardins, Deepak Bhatnagar, Peter J. Cotty (2003). United States Department of Agriculture – Pre-harvest Prevention of Mycotoxins and Mycotoxigenics in American Crops, Pest Management Science, Volume 59, Number 6-7, pp. 629-642 [19659006] Daenicke R, Aulrich K, Flachowsky G (1999). GMO in animal feed: Nutritional properties of corn Bt … More: Fachzeitschrift uber Forschung, Industry, Institute for Animal Research 135-137, Federal Agricultural Research Center Braunschweig (FAL), Germany.
  22. Defernez M, Gunning YM, AJ Parr, Shepherd LV, Davies HV, Colquhoun IJ. (2004) J Agric Food Chem. October 6, 2004; 52 (20): 6075-85. NMR and HPLC-UV profiling of potatoes with genetic modifications of metabolic pathways.
  23. Di Carli M., Villani ME, Renzone G, L Nardi L, Pasquo A, Franconi R, Scaloni, Benvenuto E, Desiderio A. (2008). Foliar proteomic badysis of transgenic plants expressing antiviral antibodies. J Protome Res. 19 December 2008 [Epub ahead of print] Systematic badysis of protein profiles to identify any unexpected changes .
  24. Dowd, Patrick F (2000). Indirect reduction of atrial mold and badociated mycotoxins in Bacillus thuringiensis Corn under controlled open field conditions: utility and limitations, Journal of Economic Entomology Volume 93, Issue 6 (December 2000) pp. 1669-1679 Bioactive Agents Research Unit, USDA-ARS, National Agricultural Utilization Research Center, 1815 N. University Street, Peoria, IL 61604
  25. Dowd PF (2001) Biotic and Abiotic Limiting Factors Efficacy of Bt corn in the indirect reduction of mycotoxin levels in commercial fields. J Econ Ent 94 (5): 1067 to 1074.
  26. Dubouzet JG, Ishihara A., Matsuda F., Miyagawa H., Iwata H. and Wakasa K. (2007) Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic badyzes of high-grade rice tryptophan expressing a mutant anthranilate. subunit alpha synthase. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58 (12): 3309-21. Epub 2007 4 September.
  27. Duggan, P. S., Chambers, P.A., Heritage, J., Forbes, J.M. (2002). Free DNA survival coding for antibiotic resistance of transgenic corn and DNA transformation activity in ovine saliva, sheep's body fluids and silage effluents. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 191, 71-77.
  28. PD Enot Manfred Beckmann, David Overy, and John Draper (2006) Prediction of the Interpretability of Metabolome Models Based on Behavior, Assumed Identity, and the biological relevance of the explanatory signals. PNAS, October 3, 2006, Vol. 103 (40): 14865-14870
  29. Ewen SWB, Pusztai A (1999). Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on the rat small intestine. Lancet 354: 1353-1354
  30. Finamore A, Roselli M, BrittiS, Monastra G, Ambra R, Turrini A, Mengheri E. (2008). Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 mice ingested. J Agric Food Chem. November 14, 2008 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 19007233
  31. Flachowsky G, Halle I, Aulrich K Long-Term Feeding of Bt Corn – a ten-generation study with quail. Arch Anim Nutr. December 2005; 59 (6): 449-51. Institute of Animal Nutrition, Federal Agricultural Research Center, Braunschweig, Germany. [email protected] see also (REVIEW) Flachowsky G, Chesson A, Aulrich K. Feed with feed from genetically modified plants.
  32. Gregersen PL, Brinch-Pedersen H, Holm PB. (2005) Comparative badysis based on a microarray gene expression profiles during grain development in transgenic and wild type wheat. Transgenic Res. December 2005; 14 (6): 887-905.
  33. Gizzarelli F, Corinti S, B Barletta, Iacovacci P, Brunetto B, Butteroni C, Affori R, Onori R, Miraglia M, Panzini G, Di Felice G and Tinghino R. (2006). of the allergenicity of a genetically modified soy protein extract in a murine model of oral sensitization to a specific allergen. Clin Exp Allergy. February 2006; 36 (2): 238-48.
  34. Halle, I., K. Aulrich and G. Flachowsky. 2004. Four generations of GM maize for the feeding of breeding quails. (Futterung von gentechnisch verändertem But in Zuchtwachtein über vier Generationen). Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 13: 124. Institute of Animal Nutrition, Federal Agricultural Research Center (FAL), Braunschweig, Germany
  35. Jenkins Helen, Nigel Hardy, Manfred Beckmann, John Draper, Aileen Smith, Janet Taylor, Oliver Fiehn, Royston Goodacre and Raoul J Bino, Robert Hall, Joachim Kopka, Geoffrey A. Lane, B. Markus Lange, Jang R. Liu, Pedro Mendes, Basil J. Nikolau, Stephen G. Oliver, Norman W. Paton, Sue Rhee, Ute Roessner-Tunali, Kazuki Saito, Jørn Smedsgaard, Lloyd W. Sumner, Trevor Wang, Sean Walsh, Eve Syrkin Wurtele, Douglas B. Kell. (2004). Proposed framework for describing plant metabolomic experiments and their results. Nature Biotechnology 22, 1601-1606. Under the British Food Safety Authority G02006: metabolome technology for the profiling of genetically modified and conventional plant materials
  36. Jia, Shirong, Wang Feng Lei Shi Qianhua Yuge Huge Liu Yilong Shuguang Liao Li Wujun Jin Huipu Peng. 2007. Transgene flux to hybrid rice and its male sterile lines Transgenic Res 16: 491-501
  37. Kılıc A, Akay M T. 2008. A three-generation study of genetically modified Bt corn in rats: Biochemical and biological survey Histopathological Food and Chemical Toxicology 46: 1164-1170.
  38. Kleter, A. Gijs, Ad ACM Peijnenburg and Henk JM Aarts. 2005. Health Considerations for Horizontal Transfer of Microbial Transgenes in Genetically Modified Crops. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 4 (2005) 326-352.
  39. Kleter, GA, Bhula, R., Bodnaruk, K, Carazo, F, Harris, CA, Katayama, Kuiper, Kuiper, Racke KD, Rubin B, Shevah Y, Stephenson. GR, Tanaka K, Unsworth J, Wauchope RD, Wong SS. 2007. Modified Use of Pesticides on Transgenic Crops and Associated Environmental Impact from an Environmental Perspective. Pest Manag Sci 63 (11): 1107-15 [19659006] Kleter, GA, Peijnenburg, AA. 2002. Search in transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino acid sequences identical to linear epitopes of potential allergens binding to IgE. BMC Struct Biol 2: 8.
  40. Kuiper HA, Hub P JM Noteborn and ACM Peijnenburg. 1999 Adequacy of methods for testing the safety of genetically modified foods. Lancet 354: 1315-6.
  41. Gall, Gwénaëlle, Susan DuPont, Fred A. Mellon, Adrienne L. Davis, Geoff J. Collins, Martine E. Verhoeyen and Ian J. Colquhoun. 2003. Characterization and content of flavonoid glycosides in genetically modified tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Fruits J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (9): 2438 to 2446.
  42. Gall G, IJ Colquhoun, AL Davis, Collins GJ, ME Verhoeyen. 2003. Profiling tomato metabolites (Lycopersicon esculentum) using 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool for detecting potential unintended effects following genetic modification. J Agric Food Chem 51 (9): 2447-56. Erratum in: 2004. J Agric Food Chem 52 (10): 3210.
  43. Lehesranta, Satu J., Howard V. Davies, Louise V.T. Sheepherd, Naoise Nunan, Jim W. McNicol, Seppo Auriola, Kaisa M. Koistinen, Suomalainen Soil, Harri I. Kokko and Sirpa O. Kärenlampi. 2005. Comparison of tuber proteomes of potato varieties, country varieties and genetically modified lines. Plant Physiology 138: 1690-1699.
  44. Li X, Huang K, He X, Zhu B, Liang Z, Li H, Luo Y. 2007. Comparison of the nutritional quality between Chinese indica rice with the sck and cry1Ac genes and its non-transgenic genes. counterpart.J Food Sci. August 2007; 72 (6): S420-4.
  45. Malatesta M, Boraldi F, Annovi G, Baldelli B, Battistelli S, Biggiogera M, Quaglino D. 2008. A long-term study on female mice fed genetically modified soy: effects on liver aging.Histochem Cell Biol .
  46. Brown NM and Setchell KDR. 2001. Animal models impacted by phytoestrogens in a commercial food: implications for hormone-mediated pathways. Laboratory Investigation 81: 735-747. "All researchers need to be vigilant about the phytoestrogen composition of commercial rodent diets, as there is a history of potent biological effects in large animals and humans, due to high concentrations of circulating isoflavones."
  47. Thigpen JE. 2004. Selection of the appropriate diet for rodents for research and testing on endocrine disruptors. ILAR Journal. 45: 401-416.
  48. Malatesta M, Tiberi C, Baldelli B, Battistelli S, Manuali E, Biggiogera M. 2005. Reversibility of nuclear changes in hepatocytes in mice fed on genetically modified soybeans. Eur J Histochem 49 (3): 237-42.
  49. Momma K, W Hashimoto, Yoon HJ, Ozawa S, Fukuda Y, Kawai S, Takaiwa F, Utsumi S and Murata K. 2000. Assessing the safety of genetically modified rice with soy glycinin in studies feeding on rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 64: 1881-6.
  50. Montero M, Coll. A, Nadal A, Messeguer J, Pla M. Only half of the transcriptomic differences between resistant and genetically modified rice are badociated with the transgene. Plant Biotechnology, October 29, 2010 DOI: 10.1111 / j.1467-7652.2010.00572.x
  51. Peterson, Robert KD and Leslie M. Shama, 2005. Comparative Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified, Mutagenic and Conventional Wheat Production Systems . Transgenic Research 14 (6) p. 859-875. This study was funded solely by a USDA special research grant awarded to the Institute for Biobased Products and by the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Montana State University.
  52. Phipps RH, Deaville ER, Maddison, British Columbia (2003). in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood and feces of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 4070-4078. Financed by the Food Standards Agency of the United Kingdom
  53. Ramessar, Koreen, Ariadna Peremarti. Sonia Go'mez-Galera Shaista Marian Naqvi Moralejo and Pilar Mun~oz Teresa Capell 2007. Biosafety Assessment and Risk Framework for Selectable Marker Genes in Transgenic Plants: A Case in Which Science Negative. does not support politics, Transgenic Res 16: 261-280. This work was funded in part by the FP6 Pharma-Planta European project.
  54. Rhee, GS, Cho, DH, Won, YH, Seok, JH, SS, Kwack, SJ, Lee, DR, Chae, SY, Kim, JW, Lee, BM, Park, KL, Choi, KS, 2005 A multigeneration toxicity study of the reproduction and development of the bar gene inserted into genetically modified potato in rats. J. Toxicol. About. Health A 68, 2263-2226.
  55. Knudsen I, Poulsen M. 2007. Comparative safety trials of genetically modified foods as part of a 90-day feeding study in the rat to distinguish the primary effects of the side effects of the new genetic event. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 49 (1): 53-62.
  56. Lutz B, S Wiedemann, Einspanier R, Mayer J, Albrecht C., 2005. Degradation of Cry1Ab protein from genetically modified corn in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53: 1453-1456. This concerns the digestibility of an insect detection protein that is considered an indicator of the risk of allergenicity. The risk of allergenicity is one of the major concerns of people concerned about the safety of genetically modified foods
  57. Rank A, Linke B and Jansen B. 2005. Detection of Transgene RNA Variants in Roundup Ready Soybeans , European Food Research and Technology 220 (3-4): 438-443.
  58. Reuter T, Aulrich K, Berk A, Flachowsky G., 2002. Research on genetically modified maize (Bt maize) in the United States. pig feed: chemical and nutritional composition evaluation. Arch Tierernahr 56 (1): 23 to 31.
  59. Rosati, A, Bogani P (2008) Characterization of the 3-position transgene insertion site and derived mRNAs in maize MON810 YieldGard® Molecular Biology 67: 271-281. Dr. G. Monastra provided corn seeds MON810 and isogenic control corn. This work was funded by a grant from MIPAF (Ministry of Agricultural Policies, Alimentari e Forestali), Project: "GMO in Agricoltura.
  60. Sakamoto, Y .; Tada, Y; Fukumori, N; Tayama, K; Ando, ​​H; Takahashi, H; Kubo, Y; Nagasawa, A; Yano, N; Yuzawa, K; Ogata, A; Kamimura, H. 2007. Study of the diet of genetically modified soybean on F344 rats for 52 weeks. Journal of the Food Hygiene Society of Japan, 48 (3): 41-50.
  61. Sakamoto Y, Tada Y, Fukumori N, Tayama K. Ando H .; H. Takahashi; Y. Kubo; A. Nagasawa; N. Yano; K. Yuzawa; Ogata AA 2008. Nutrition study during 104 weeks of genetically modified soybean in F344 rats. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zbadhi. 49 (4): 272-222.
  62. Shepherd LV, McNicol JW, R. Razzo, MA MA, Davies HV (2006). To evaluate the potential for unwanted effects in genetically modified potatoes disturbed by metabolic and developmental processes. Targeted badysis of key nutrients and anti-nutrients. Transgenic Res. 15 (4): 409-25.
  63. Shimada N, Murata H, Mikami O, Yoshioka M, Guruge KS, Yamanaka N, Y Nakajima Y, Miyazaki S. 2006. Effects of Corn Calf Feeding genetically modified bt11: a clinico-biochemical study.J Vet Med Sci. 2006 Oct. 68 (10): 1113-5
  64. Sinagawa-García SR, Rascón-Cruz Q, Valdez-Ortiz A., Medina-Godoy S., Escobar-Gutiérrez A., Paredes-López O. 2004. Assessment of in vitro digestibility and allergenicity safety of genetically modified maize with an 11S amaranth globulin. J Agric Food Chem. May 5, 2004; 52 (9): 2709 and 14.
  65. Schrøder M, Poulsen M, Wilcks A, Kroghsbo S, Miller A, Frenzel T, Danier, M Rychlik, Emami K, Portal A, Shu Q, Engel KH, Altosaar I, Knudsen I. Safety study of 90 days of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein ( Bacillus thuringiensis toxin) in the Wistar rat. Food Chem Toxicol. March 2007; 45 (3): 339-499.
  66. Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms [EFSA] ( Question No. EFSA-Q-2008-077) Adopted on 29 October 2008, request for a review European Commission scientific opinion on the safeguard clause invoked by France on MON810 maize in accordance with Article 23 of Directive 2001/18 / EC and the emergency measure referred to in Article 1 of the Directive. Article 34 of Regulation No 1829/2003 / EC1. EFSA Journal (2008) 850, 1-45
  67. Sten E, PS Skov, SB Andersen, Torp AM, Olesen A, Bindslev-Jensen U, LK Poulsen, Bindslev-Jensen C., 2004. A comparative study of the 39; allergen power soybean cultivars genetically modified wild-type and glyphosate tolerant. APMIS. 2004 January; 112 (1): 21-8. This study is part of the BioRisk projects, supported by the Danish Council for Medical Research, and EpiPat, supported by the Danish Ministry of Food.
  68. Takahashi, H. Hotta, Y. Hayashi, M. Kawai-Yamada, M. Komatsu, S. Uchimiya, H. 2005. Analysis of the high-throughput metabolome and proteome of transgenic rice plants (Oryza sativa L. ). Plant Biotechnol 22, 47-50.
  69. Taylor, J., King, R., Altmann, T. and Fiehn, O. (2002) Application of metabolomics to genotype discrimination of a plant at Statistics and machine learning. Bioinformatics 18, S241-S248 (2002). UK Food Safety Authority under G02006: Metabolome technology for profiling genetically modified and conventional plant material
  70. Tony MA, Butschke A, Broll H, Grohmann L, Zagon J, Halle I, Dänicke S, Schauzu M, Hafez HM, Flachowsky G. Assessment of the safety of Bt 176 maize in the nutrition of broilers: breakdown of maize DNA and its metabolic fate. Arch Tierernahr. 2003 August; 57 (4): 235-52.
  71. Venneria E, Simone Fanasca, Giovanni Monastra, Enrico Finotti, Roberto Ambra, Elena Azzini, Alessandra Durazzo, Maria Stella Foddai and Giuseppe Maiani (2008). Values ​​of genetically modified wheat, maize and tomato crops J. Agric. Food Chem.
  72. K Wakasa, Hasegawa H, Nemoto H, Matsuda F, Miyazawa H, Y Tozawa, K Morino, Komatsu A, Yamaka T, Terakawa T and H Miyagawa H.2006. Accumulation of high-level tryptophan in transgenic rice seed and its limited effects on agronomic characteristics and profile of seed metabolites.J Exp Bot. 2006; 57 (12): 3069-78.
  73. Weekends, Rebecca, Theodore Allnutt, Boffey Caroline, Sarah Morgan, Bilton Mark, Roger Daniels and Christine Henry (2008) Study of gene flow from one culture to the other to help from a farm. Scale Sites of Feed Corn (Zea mays L.) in the United Kingdom Transgenic Res (2007) 16: 203-211. Financed by Defra (EPG project 1/5/138). Bayer CropScience provided the T25 corn seed positive control.
  74. Windels P, Taverniers I, Depicker A, Van Bockstaele E, De Loose M (2001) Characterization of the soy insert Roundup Ready Eur Food Technol Res 213: 107-112. 19659006] Zhang, Jun, Lin Cai, Cheng Jiaqin, Huizhu Mao, Xiaoping Fan, Zhaohong Meng, Chan Ka Man, Zhang Huijun, Jianfei Qi, Lianghui Ji and Yan Hong (2008) Transgenic Integration and Organization in Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) Transgenic Research Genome 17 (2) 293-306. This project was funded by an internal research grant from Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory in Singapore.
  75. Zhu Y, Li D, Wang F, Yin J, Jin H (2004) Nutritional badysis and fate of soybean meal DNA derived from Roundup Ready or conventional soybean using rats.
  76. Zolla L, Rinalducci S, Antonioli P, Righetti PG (2008). Proteomics is a complementary tool for identifying unwanted side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J Protome Res. 2008 May; 7 (5): 1850-61.
  77. Zywicki Britta, Gareth Catchpole, John Draper and Oliver Fiehn. 2004. Comparison of LC-ESI-MS / MS Rapid Methods for the Determination of Glycoalkaloids in Field-grown Transgenic Potatoes. Analytical biochemistry. United Kingdom Food Safety Authority under G02006: Metabolome technology for profiling genetically modified plant material and conventional plants
  78. Ute Vogler, Anja S. Rott, Cesare Gessler and Silvia Dorn. How conventional and transgenic apple genotypes affect non-target organisms at higher trophic levels. Entomologia Experimentalis and Applicata Volume 134 Number 2, Pages 114 – 121
  79. Coll A, Nadal A, Collado R, Capellades G, Kubista M, Messeguer J, Pla M. Natural variation accounts for most transcriptomic changes in MON810 maize and similar non-genetically modified varieties subject to two agricultural nitrogen fertilization practices. Plant Mol Biol. June 2010; 73 (3): 349-62. Epub 2010, March 27th.
  80. Wiedemann S, Gürtler P, Albrecht C., 2007. Effect of feeding genetically modified corn for cows on the bacterial rumen community of cattle. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73 (24): 8012-80
  81. Transgenic × Environmental Interactions in Genetically Modified Wheat
  82. Are Genetically Modified and Conventional Cereals Really Different?
  83. Borejsza-Wysocka et al., Stable expression and phenotypic impact of the attachain E transgene on orchards grown on an orchard over a 12-year period. BMC Biotechnology 2010, 10:41
  84. Coll A, Nadal A, Collado R, Capellades G, Messeguer J, Mele E, Palaudelmas M, Pla M (2009) The gene expression profiles of corn MON810 and varieties comparable non-GM corn grown in the field are more similar than conventional lines. Transgenic Res 18: 801-808
  85. Andreas Lindfeld, Corsin Lang, Eva Knop, Wolfgang Nentwig, Hard to digest or a piece of cake? Does Genetically Modified Wheat Affect the Survival and Reproduction of Enchytraeus albidus (Annelida: Enchytraeidae) ?, Applied Soil Ecology, Volume 47, Number 1, January 2011, pages 51-58, ISSN 0929-1393 , DOI: 10.1016 / j.apsoil.2010.10. 012.
  86. S. von Burg, F.J.F. van Veen, F. Alvarez-Alfageme, J. Romeis. Community structure of parasitoid aphids on genetically modified wheat. Biology Letters 2011; DOI: 10.1098 / rsbl.2010.1147
  87. Kusano M, H Redestig, H Hirai, Oikawa A, Matsuda F, Fukushima A, Arita M, Watanabe S, Yano M, Hiwasa-Tanase K, Ezura H, Saito K. Covering Chemical diversity of genetically modified tomatoes using metabolomics
    for an objective badessment of substantial equivalence. PLoS One. February 16, 2011; 6 (2): 16998.
  88. Jose L. Domingo, Jordi Gine Bordonaba, A review of the literature on the safety badessment of genetically modified plants, Environment International, Volume 37, Number 4, May 2011, Pages 734-742, ISSN 0160-4120, DOI: 10.1016 / j.envint.2011.01.003. The review covers food studies conducted between 2007 and 2010 (but no 2010 articles included).
  89. Yuan Y, Xu W, Luo Y, Liu H, Lu J, Su C, Huang K. Effects of genetically modified T2A-1 rice on faecal microflora from rats during a 90-day supplementation. J Sci Food Agric. April 26, 2011: 10.1002 / jsfa.4421. [Epub ahead of print]
  90. Stuart J. Smyth, Michael Gusta, Kenneth Belcher, Peter W. B. Phillips, and David Castle. Environmental impacts of herbicide tolerant canola production in western Canada. Agricultural Systems, Volume 104, Number 5, June 2011, Pages 403-410
  91. Duan JJ, Marvier M, Huesing J, Dively G, Huang ZY, 2008 A meta-badysis of the effects of Bt cultures on honey bees ( Hymenoptera: Apidae). PLoS ONE 3 (1): e1415. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0001415
  92. Sishuo Cao, Wentao Xu, Yunbo Luo, Xiaoyun He, Yanfang Yuan, Wenjun Ran, Lixing Lianga and Kunlun Huang. Étude métabonomique du repas transgénique de riz Bacillus thuringiensis (T2A-1) dans le cadre d'une étude de toxicité alimentaire de 90 jours chez le rat. Mol. BioSyst., 2011, DOI: 10.1039 / C1MB05076A (19 mai 2011)
  93. Helga Gruber, Vijay Paul, Patrick Guertler, Hubert Spiekers, Ales Tichopad, Heinrich H.D. Meyer et Martin Muller. Devenir de la protéine Cry1Ab dans les systèmes agricoles sous gestion des boues de vaches nourries au maïs génétiquement modifié (Zea mays L.) MON810: une évaluation quantitative. J. Agric. Food Chem. Article ASAP DOI: 10.1021 / jf200854n Date de publication (Web): 23 mai 2011
  94. Lin, B., Tan, Z., Xiao, G., Wang, M., Cong, Z., Wang, S., Tang, S., Zhou, C., Z. et Wang, W. (2009), Évaluation de l'équivalence compositionnelle et nutritionnelle du riz génétiquement modifié par rapport au riz conventionnel à l'aide in situ et techniques in vitro . Journal de la science de l'alimentation et de l'agriculture, 89: 1490-1497. doi: 10.1002 / jsfa.3613
  95. A. M. Shelton, J.-Z. Zhao et R. T. Roush Conséquences économiques, écologiques, liées à la sécurité des aliments et sur le plan social du déploiement de plantes transgéniques Bt. Revue annuelle d'entomologie, vol. 47: 845-881 (date de publication du volume, janvier 2002)
  96. D. M. Olson, J.R. Ruberson, A.R. Zeilinger et D. A. Andow, préférence de la colonisation de Euschistus servus et de Nezara viridula dans des variétés de coton transgénique, d'arachide et de soja. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 139: 161-169, 2011
  97. Fangneng Huang, David A. Andow et Lawrent L. Buschman. Succès de la stratégie de gestion de la résistance aux fortes doses et aux refuges après 15 ans d’utilisation de la culture Bt en Amérique du Nord. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 140: 1–16, 2011
  98. Álvarez-Alfageme F, von Burg S, Romeis J, 2011 Infestation de blé transgénique résistant à la moisissure en poudre par des herbivores insectes naturels, dans des conditions environnementales différentes. PLoS ONE 6 (7): 22690 €. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0022690
  99. Tang M, Xie T, W Cheng, Q L, Yang S, Yang D, Cui W, Li K. Étude de sécurité sur 90 jours de riz génétiquement modifié exprimant rhIGF-1 protéine chez les rats C57BL / 6J. Rés. Transgénique . 11 septembre 2011
  100. Gruber H., Paul V., Meyer H.H.D., Muller M. (2011). Détermination de la protéine insecticide Cry1Ab dans le sol, recueillie au cours de la dernière saison de croissance d'un essai au champ sur le maïs Bt MON810, d'une durée de neuf ans. Transgénique Res. 16 avril 2011
  101. Duc C, W Nentwig, A Lindfeld, 2011 Aucun effet indésirable du blé antifongique génétiquement modifié sur la dynamique de décomposition et la communauté de la faune du sol – Une étude de terrain. PLoS ONE 6 (10): e25014. doi: 10.1371 / journal.pone.0025014
  102. Rose R, Dively GP. Effets du maïs sucré transgénique Bt traité avec un insecticide et actif sur les lépidoptères sur l'abondance et la diversité des arthropodes. Environ Entomol. 2007 octobre; 36 (5): 1254 à 128.
  103. Powell M., AO Wheatley, F Omoruyi, Asemota HN, PN NP, Tennant PF. Effets comparés des papayes transgéniques et conventionnelles administrées par voie alimentaire sur certains paramètres intestinaux chez le rat. Transgénique Res. 2010 juin; 19 (3): 511-8. Epub 2009 19 août.
  104. Matilde Eizaguirre, Ramon Albajes, Carmen Lo´pez, Jordi Eras, Beléon Lumbierres et Xavier Pons. Six ans après l'introduction commerciale du maïs Bt en Espagne: évaluation sur le terrain, impact et perspectives d'avenir Transgenic Research (2006) 15: 1-12 DOI 10.1007 / s11248-005-3998-1
  105. M. K. Dhillion et H. C. Sharma. Impact du coton issu du génie Bt sur les arthropodes cibles et non cibles, le flux de toxines à travers différents niveaux trophiques et le rendement en coton-graine. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 22 (3-Spl. Issue): (462-466) 2009
  106. Marvier M, McCreedy C, Regetz J, Kareiva P. Une méta-badyse des effets du coton Bt et du maïs sur les invertébrés non ciblés. Science 316, 1475 (2007); DOI: 10.1126/science.1139208
  107. Manda G. Cattaneo, Christine Yafuso, Chris Schmidt, Cho-ying Huang, Magfurar Rahman, Carl Olson,
    Christa Ellers-Kirk, Barron J. Orr, Stuart E. Marsh, Larry Antilla, Pierre Dutilleul, and Yves Carriere Y. Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16;103(20):7571-6. Epub 2006 May 4.
  108. B. Anilkumar, A. Gopala Reddy, B. Kalakumar, M. Usha Rani, Y. Anjaneyulu, T. Raghunandan, Y. Ramana Reddy, K. Jyothi, and K. S. Gopi. Sero-biochemical studies in sheep fed with Bt cotton plants. Toxicol Int. 2010 Jul–Dec; 17(2): 99–101. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.72680. (local PDF)
  109. Mohanta RK, Singhal KK, Tyagi AK, Rajput YS, Prasad S. Nutritional evaluation of transgenic cottonseed in the ration of lactating dairy cows. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Mar;42(3):431-8. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
  110. Sarkar B, Patra AK, Purakayastha TJ, Megharaj M. Assessment of biological and biochemical indicators in soil under transgenic Bt and non-Bt cotton crop in a sub-tropical environment. Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Sep;156(1-4):595-604. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
  111. Qaim, M. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health. (PDF) New Biotechnology Volume 27, Issue 5, 30 November 2010, Pages 552-557
  112. Chelsea, S., et al. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: A literature review. Food Chem. Toxicol. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048
  113. Maria C. Walsh, Stefan G. Buzoianu1, Gillian E. Gardiner, Mary C. Rea, R. Paul Ross, Joseph P. Cbadidy and Peadar G. Lawlor. Effects of short-term feeding of Bt MON810 maize on growth performance, organ morphology and function in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition (2012), 107, 364–371 doi:10.1017/S0007114511003011
  114. McCallum EJ, Cunningham JP, Lücker J, Zalucki MP, De Voss JJ, Botella JR. Increased plant volatile production affects oviposition, but not larval development, in the moth Helicoverpa armigera. J Exp Biol. 2011 Nov 1;214(Pt 21):3672-7 PMID 21993797
  115. Walsh MC, Buzoianu SG, Gardiner GE, Rea MC, Gelencsér E, et al. (2011) Fate of Transgenic DNA from Orally Administered Bt MON810 Maize and Effects on Immune Response and Growth in Pigs. PLoS ONE 6(11): e27177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027177
  116. Gao MQ, Hou SP, Pu DQ, Shi M, Ye GY, Chen XX. Multi-generation effects of Bt rice on Anagrus nilaparvatae, a parasitoid of the nontarget pest Nilapavarta lugens. Environ Entomol. 2010 Dec;39(6):2039-44. PMID 22182572
  117. Michaela Prischl, Evelyn Hackl, Milica Pastar, Stefan Pfeiffer, Angela Sessitsch, Genetically modified Bt maize lines containing cry3Bb1, cry1A105 or cry1Ab2 do not affect the structure and functioning of root-badociated endophyte communities, Applied Soil Ecology, Volume 54, March 2012, Pages 39-48, ISSN 0929-1393, 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.12.005.
  118. Olivier Sanvido, Jörg Romeis, Achim Gathmann, Marco Gielkens, Alan Raybould, Franz Bigler, Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making, Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 15, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 82-91, ISSN 1462-9011, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.006.
  119. Cátia Fonseca, Sébastien Planchon, Jenny Renaut, Maria Margarida Oliveira, Rita Batista, Characterization of maize allergens — MON810 vs. its non-transgenic counterpart, Journal of Proteomics, Available online 13 January 2012, ISSN 1874-3919, 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.01.005.
  120. Ping-Li Dai, Wei Zhou, Jie Zhang, Hong-Juan Cui, Qiang Wang, Wei-Yu Jiang, Ji-Hu Sun, Yan-Yan Wu, Ting Zhou, Field badessment of Bt cry1Ah corn pollen on the survival, development and behavior of Apis mellifera ligustica, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Available online 23 February 2012, ISSN 0147-6513, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.01.005.
  121. Jaimie Schnell, He´le`ne Labbe´, Nik Kovinich, Yuzuki Manabe, Brian Miki. Comparability of imazapyr-resistant Arabidopsis created
    by transgenesis and mutagenesis. Transgenic Res. 2012 DOI 10.1007/s11248-012-9597-z
  122. Tian J-C, Chen Y, Li Z-L, Li K, Chen M, et al. (2012) Transgenic Cry1Ab Rice Does Not Impact Ecological Fitness and Predation of a Generalist Spider. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35164. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035164
  123. Cheeke TE, Rosenstiel TN, Cruzan MB. Evidence of Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Colonization in Multiple Lines of Bt Maize. Am. J. Bot. April 2012 vol. 99 no. 4 700-707. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100529