[ad_1]
Dear Akshay,
You owe your fame partly to Sikh themes. Unfortunately, until today, you have mostly represented Sikh characters who were absurdly or strangely out of place.
In Singh Is King in my opinion, you praised the proud Sikh identity – your Singh Bling was worse
The representation of Sikhs in Bollywood films has evolved. But far from being fast enough. (Photo: DailyO)
But there is a reason why these films were shot in the first place.
A large – and lucrative – Bollywood market exists overseas. It is dominated by the deep pockets of Sikhs from developed countries on both hemispheres of the developed world.
Bollywood realized this economic reality just 20 years ago. He began to experiment with Sikh themes as the Internet era flourished and the world became a global village.
But he also had to evolve.
The rise of Diljit Dosanjh as the iconic star and celebrity of social media led Bollywood cast off the fake topi-turbans ready-made that Akshay Kumar wore eccentrically in Singh Is King
.
Hindi film actors began to attach turbans in awesome styles for an authentic on-screen look.
Hangover from the insipid portrayal of Sikhs in films like Raja Hindustani and Kuch Kuch Hota Hai persisted. The huge film industry located in the Indian financial capital – with few exceptions – still lacks the skills and intellectual sophistication to skilfully project the history, characters and Sikh subjects into the cinema.
The climate of the day.
Thus, in my view, Kesari of Kesar of Akshay Kumar stands out as an example of unnecessary infection of what was a formidable act of collective value in the world. British Indian Army.
What shocked me in Kesari
The first deviation is the fake beard-shaped wig of the main thread.
Kesari takes place at the end of the 19th century – 1897 ] to be precise.
Finding the right detail was not so difficult
Akshay, if your topi-turban was a victim of the Singh Is King your makeup in Kesari in my opinion, this does not serve the valiant Sikh sergeant you play.
Here you did not need any major lessons in history. A quick glance at the archived images of the 36 Sikhs of the British Indian Army might have inspired you to adopt a realistic – and attractive – look.
The Battle of Saragarhi took place in 1897. Getting the details correctly was not so difficult. (Left: Kesari still, right: 36th Sikh Regiment, courtesy of Capt Jay Singh-Sohal)
Given the importance of this role, you could have spent some time to grow your beard naturally. But apparently, you have not done it. Instead, you chose the same topi-turban shortcut Singh-Is-King for your facial hair and compromised the imposing character of Saragarhi.
But, dear Akshay, your role in Kesari is staggering for more than one reason.
Your Toilets: Ek Prem Katha and Pad Man were indisputably consistent with the Modi government's sanitation program. They carried a positive message. Good.
But Kesari in spite of his captivating last hour and his works of art promising commercial success, burst unreasonably into the religious and ideological realms. ?
Why insert Khalsa's kesri in what was essentially a battle between a disciplined British Indian Army and Pathan tribes in the North West Frontier Province?
According to my interview with researchers from the modern British Armed Forces, I am convinced that it was an unwelcome interpolation in a historic battle.
Saragarhi – This is not a Sikh-Vs-Muslim battle
Inadvertently or by design, the film gives a Sikh against. The Muslim color is among the last references in the international military archives.
The brew, in my opinion, seems to play well for the Bhagva Gallery of today's power brokers.
Khalsa kesri is not t bhagva, both visually and symbolically.
The original Sikh flags kesri – called Nishan Sahib – were of altered or yellowish color, no reddish color or bhagva.
Furthermore, it was not a 'dharam yudh'. for the Khalsa when 21 soldiers of the 36 Sikhs of the British Indian Army braved their positions and fought to the death against 10,000 members of the marauding tribe.
It is rather the spirit of the soldier – the courage, commitment and loyalty – of the Khalsa that worked inherently. 19659002] No one has changed – nor has he had to change – the dress code of his army to invoke something latent for an upcoming religious battle. But you did it by playing Havildar Ishar Singh, the chief in Saragarhi.
In reality, the 21 soldiers fought with their splendid khaki turbans in the uniform of 36 Sikhs.
The researchers of the modern British army to which I spoke also rejected the fictional scenes of Sikh soldiers building mosques around the villages of Saragarhi in of Kesari .
"They would not have entered the Muslim villages or in fact Captain Jay Singh-Sohal, an active member of the British Army Reserve, author and producer of an innovative documentary , still has many tasks to do to strengthen the defense of his own positions and in his camps on Saragarhi.
In addition, Akshay, while playing Havildar Ishar Singh, is also shown to you that he is leaving the post to dialogue in full battle with the enemy forces
talk to the enemy? Historians debate some sequences shown in kesari. (still representative of the film)
I'm sorry but that did not happen in the documented history
"Regarding the talks, it was not for the Sikhs to meet with the Pathans – – They had strict orders to follow, "said Soh al. "The Pathans have given openings that they could leave safe, but they have been from afar and certainly not face to face."
Bollywood takes its own liberties with certain communities and stories .
But why already alter the facts So rich – unless there is possibly an outside influence?
That said, thank you, dear Akshay, for Kesari . The narrative that is rooted around the true story of Saragarhi has attracted public attention.
At a time when critical thinking is muzzled, we are debating the means of not blindly absorbing everything Bollywood says under the name of artistic license.
And that's a good thing.
Read also: Kesari is a triumph of the acting game, the action – and Akshay! ]
[ad_2]
Source link
