[ad_1]
In recent years, David Benioff and D.B. Weiss' Game of Thrones went astray. This is not a coincidence, it is also when they decided to leave George RR Martin A song of ice and fire. Without source material, the series became a crude imitation of what it was during the first four seasons, as it lost everything that made it special.
Since then, creative choices have been at best defying logic – at best optimized at worst.
We saw Jon Snow die and come back to life in a show where all deaths are permanent. We had a ridiculous ploy to convince Cersei and Jaime Lannister of the threat of the Wights – which implied the abandonment of all the geographical rules of the universe and characters covering long distances twice during the war. ;a episode.
to the strange Battle of Winterfell so artificially invented by the writers that it seemed that the IQ of each character had been divided into quarters. This continued in the last episode, The Last of the Starks, when Daenerys Targaryen – without rhyme or reason – decided to fly his dragons to Dragonstone, where one of them was kill.
The Battle of Winterfell remains one of the biggest disappointments with the screenplay! (Source: YouTube screengrab)
There are many who can forgive – or more likely, rationalize – all these poor writing cases simply because they are hooked to the series and they like anything. These issues of machineries and illogical plots are in the realm of craftsmanship.
But the problem becomes much more serious when we see the artistic aspect of Game of Thrones .
In the absence of good sources, the authors resorted to the worst sort of regressive clichés with its central characters. Although the series has always been in a dark, feudal and patriarchal world, its main characters have often broken the rules. The conflict between a cruel world with oppressive rules and the characters who challenged them created a complex and realistic drama (1965-1900). Daenerys, although a woman, aspired to become the queen of the seven kingdoms. Her ambition, kindness and generosity attracted many followers and she was able to surround her with extremely loyal counselors. Her reign in Essos was right – she had made mistakes, but she had imposed herself as a smart leader whose greatest strength was to be fair.
She locked up her dragons when she saw the damage they were causing to innocent people. She freed many slaves and destroyed their former owners, which earned her an entire army fighting for her loyalty. She used the right balance of power and diplomacy to win Jon Snow by her side and was selfless in engaging her army in the fight against the army of the dead.
Jon inspires loyalty simply because he is "one of them". Is this not the basic idea of castism, racism and badism? (Source: YouTube screengrab)
Contrast this with Jon Snow: he has always been a fundamentally good man, but also naive, unfamiliar with the traditions of the world to the point of becoming his first love, The Ygritte's slogan was "You do not know anything, Jon Snow."
Although his heart was always in the right place, he simply did not have the mental faculties to be a good leader. His weak management skills led his own men to kill him. If it were not Ygritte, Melisandre, Sansa and Daenerys, at one time or another, he would not be alive. His inability to be a military leader was evident at the Battle of Winterfell, where he had to scream after a dragon.
Jon Snow is the hero par excellence of cliché fantasy works.
He wears his heart very kindly. on his sleeve, he does not hesitate to sacrifice himself for the greater good and he does not want the throne. And now he inspires loyalty to many northern men simply because he is "one of them" – a mentality behind casteism, racism, feudalism and institutionalized badism.
And this has been glorified by writers.
Daenerys, on the contrary, is now an "ambitious" woman guided solely by her emotions and her desire to sit on the throne. She is no longer a "balanced queen" and "lovable" – while Jon is "temperate".
Daenerys has now been transformed into the mad queen who, for no rhyme or reason, has lost all empathy for ordinary innocent people.
She is willing to burn thousands alive for a purely personal reason, like the regressive stereotypical woman who is so overwhelmed with emotion that she can not see the reason.
The most powerful women have been reduced to small quarrels when the fate of humanity is at stake. (Source: YouTUbe screengrab) [19659004] It's not just these two characters. Since the beginning of this season, all men are willing to forgive and fight each other, regardless of their history, as they apparently understand what is the biggest threat. But Sansa, Cersei and Daenerys – three powerful women – have been the little fights that fight over the throne when the fate of humanity is at stake.
Insidiously enough, the mediocrity of writing seems to have presided over at the creation of . ] Game of Thrones at a time when these badist ideas were acceptable
This shows that the power of art does not necessarily have to be used for evil with malicious intent because even a lazy writing that use an archaic internalized formula can have the same effect!
Read also: From shameful virginity to begging: why Brienne Of Tarth deserved better in GoT S8 Ep4
]
[ad_2]
Source link
