[ad_1]
Allegations of electoral malpractices and skepticism about its ability to govern the army independently have been turning since Imran Khan became elected prime minister of Pakistan. But the world of cricket has hailed its feat.
Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shahid Afridi and Mohammed Aamir are among the many renowned players in his country to have sprung from Imran's splendid performance. But hosannas are not limited to Pakistani cricketers.
Congratulatory tweets from Geoffrey Boycott, Sanjay Manjrekar, Ian Bishop and Adam Holliake flooded social media while current and former captain of Imran, Kapil Dev, has makes his joy on television.
The fraternal joy over Imran's success is understandable. Among the athletes who played at the international level, only George Weah, who represented Liberia in football, led his country in politics.
Four cricket players also became prime ministers – FHD Bell (New Zealand Prime Minister in 1925), AF Douglas-Home (British Prime Minister 1962-64), Kamisese Mara (Fijian Prime Minister 1970-87, President 1994 -2000) and Nawaz Sharif, nemesis of Imran (PM Pak 1990-93, 97-99, 2013-17) – but they never went beyond the first-clbad level.
Imran is the first international to reach such political heights, and remarkably, starting his own party only 22 years back. It was a long and largely solitary struggle that finally seems to have been rewarded.
"I have no doubt that he will become Prime Minister one day", I remember Wasim Akram told me in 2013 while we were part of the same team of comments. "Even though he's 90 years old and he's sleeping, he will not give up!"
Self-reliance, tenacity, resilience, deep ambition and optimism – which brought him to this stage of politics – defined the attributes Even though his image of Casanova made the one of the world's newspapers, Imran was immensely hardworking and dedicated, driven to excellence and triumphing with unfailing pbadion.
In 1971, with little control over line and length, he worked tirelessly to perfect his technique and skills until he became unquestionably the best in the world at the beginning of his career. 1980s. It had taken him more than a decade, but he had achieved his goal.
At that time, he was also arguably the best player in the world. And without a doubt, the best captain, repressing the glittering but mercurial players of Pakistan, spotting and bloody talented youngsters but of rank to become drummers of the world.
His authoritarian leadership (often called "autocratic") was accompanied by personal examples. from my first tour of Pakistan in 1982-83. It was a series that India lost seriously 0-3 largely because of Imran's brilliant bowling.
However, few people know that he continued to bowling despite an ankle injury midway. He could not play for two years, but Imran's intention to beat India by the biggest margin was not to be hindered by injury.
At one point, it seemed that his dream of winning the World Cup would remain unrealized. He had played in all tournaments since 1975, and Pakistan had been semifinalist in 1979 and 1983. In 1987, playing at home, they were favorites, but lost again in the semifinal in Australia
. , the only case I remember where he was consumed by a setback. Subsequently, he was convinced to return to the then President Ziz-ul-Haq, and led his team to a memorable victory in the 1991-92 World Cup.
Imran was a lion in winter when cricket was concerned. But his superb leadership saw a young team make a remarkable turnaround, coming back from the brink of foreclosure midway through the tournament.
At that time, he was committed to building the best oncology hospital in Pakistan, the memory of his mother, monumental. even task for a cricket superstar. Imran's diligence and commitment have enabled the project to come to fruition. This experience may have shaped his entry into politics
For those who know him and cricket (as this writer), Imran is the incarnation of excellence as a player and leader: to my opinion, he is the most influential with Sir Frank Worrell in the post-war period
But politics is a different ball game, and questions have been raised.
Analysts have struggled to define policy over the past two decades. He has been described repeatedly as a neo-liberal, centrist, pacifist, nationalist and hawk.
In recent months, concerns over its proximity to ultra-religious people in Pakistan and an enslaved role in the military are worrying political observers in the West. and particularly in India, where relations between the two countries are at a low level now.
Imran's first response after the elections was encouraging. He said that he knew this country (India) more than anyone else in Pakistan and that he should not be labeled as a Bollywood villain or words to that effect.
This rebadurance did not prevent speculation and suspense. As he embarks on his second innings, whether it be Imran who will lead the Generals or the reverse, that is the question that arises.
Source link
