[ad_1]
The actor Vadivelu, whose character, Neasamani, in the film Friends is in fashion on Twitter since Wednesday night, has no idea of the storm around him. "In one day, they (Twitterati) seem to have made me more famous than Modi during his swearing in," he said with surprise that his name was in vogue around the world, the international press also taking over the Twitter feed.
He knows that acting in a comedy was a "gift from God" and that his mission in life was to make people laugh.
"My job is a great job," said comedian ACE . in a phone interview on Thursday, after #pray_for_Naesamani tweets spread across Twitter around the world.
"I am a person who makes people laugh. People should laugh and be happy, that's my goal, "he said. Mr. Vadivelu said that all the glory of Neasamani should be attributed to the director Siddique. "They proposed dialogues for the character. Basically, they give me the sambhar and I added a seasoning. It comes naturally to me, "he said.
Snags in the sequel Pulikesi
But the actor has not often been seen on the screen in recent years, he was immersed in a controversy over the film. 24 hours of Pulikesi . Asked about his absence, Mr. Vadivelu said that he had 10 films on hand but he claimed that director Shankar, producer of the film 24am Pulikesi and the Council of Tamil Film Producers ( TFPC) blocked his progress. 19659002] "Without my release, how can the film [Pulikesi] continue? I do not play two but three characters in the movie. My involvement must be there. Without this, how can we succeed? ", He stated.
He explained that some parts of the script were problematic." The action and the comedy are different.I have no connection with the action. Even in 23h Pulikesi they asked me to kill the character of Nbader, who embodies my uncle.I am against the murder of anyone.They changed after that.Also in this film, there is has a specific situation that is not acceptable, "he said.
Nadigar Sangam and the TFPC did not listen to him, he said. "They say come here [for discussions]. Why should I go? I say that I am ready to act. If what you say is good, I will accept it, "he said.
In response to the allegations, a close confidante and senior member of the creative team of director Shankar, said that the changes requested by the actor had resulted in a delay in the completion of the work.the film.But even after accepting 13 of the 17 changes requested by the actor, he refused to turn for the film
"We want to make a sequel to the successful film with the legendary actor, but we also want to make sure that the script stays true to the franchise, as agreed during the making of the film," he said. he declares.
"We had spent several crores and created expensive sets in the hope that he would complete his film engagements and act in the following Pulikesi .But, he continued to delay – seeking higher compensation than originally agreed, asked for several changes to the script and also wanted to change the director of the film, Chimbudevan ".
"He must honor what he has agreed to, he can not dictate every aspect of the film, we always want to make this film, we are waiting for his answer," he said.
Source link