[ad_1]
Virat Kohli. (Image: AFP)
To his chagrin, Virat Kohli realized last week that social media, while offering limitless and unhindered contact with the world, could also be a trap unless one be careful. His badault on a fan who arose his new application and questioned the value of Indian cricketers, so to speak, became viral, vindicating it to a vast sample of people in cyberspace, then spreading in mainstream media and conversation in the world of cricket.
The storm raged for a whole day and over, but Kohli emerged to handle the controversy impressively afterward, I thought. His explanatory tweet later explaining why he had lost his temper was reconciliatory, even downright contrite, and humorous.
I guess trolling is not for me guys, I'll continue to do it! ?
I talked about how "these Indians" were mentioned in the comment and that's all. I am all for the freedom of choice. ? Keep the guys light and enjoy the holiday season. Love and peace to all. 1945– Virat Kohli (@imVkohli) November 8, 2018
After the awkward hiccup of the day before, the next shot, if I were to use the badogy of cricket, was played with skill and did not did not give the critic another chance to pound him and restore balance
Essentially, Kohli asked the trolls to enlighten him. Levity is always the best balm in such situations, and I was surprised that he did not choose this route originally. The provocation itself was commonplace and only Kohli's reaction turned a stupid and controllable situation into international turmoil.
(Image: AFP)
Frankly, the question asked by the fan was infantile. Calling Indian players, including Kohli, "overrated" was barely in tune with performance or stature and was hearing so clearly trigger a hostile reaction that I am surprised that Kohli let himself be caught with the bait.
He could have completely avoided the question, or better still. laughs with a "you have the right to have your opinion, but it does not correspond to mine" that would have thrown cold water on the eagerness of the questioner to annoy the Indian captain.
But Kohli arrived. with a crude answer, asking the questioner to go to the countries he loved the players. While engaging in childish nationalism is the unfortunate remedy chosen by many notables in public life nowadays, it was unexpectedly an athlete who was himself the object of adulation generalized, without barriers.
There are two aspects to consider in this context. this can not be lost on Kohli. He is now the stellar cricket player, but he has already been a fan: perhaps the rest, although the conditions for evaluating players have been redefined.
One, every cricket fan has his opinion, not necessarily as such. the player can wait for it. Discuss the sport in a group and you will discover that it contains a wealth of likes and dislikes, irrational and often expressed in harsher language than Kohli met on his application.
Fans may be fond of their affection, but also fickle. They can not change their minds for decades, nor do it in a day, maybe at the hour. Although the logic of their arguments may seem trivial or untenable, it is their undeniable right to express what they see and feel.
The second aspect is more sublime. Athletes, like all performing artists, transcend geographical and national boundaries. The joy of sport, the horizons of excellence and brilliance achieved by its practitioners make such barriers trivial and intended to be broken.
On a personal level, my first cricket hero was Rohan Kanhai. I still believe that the greatest cricketer who has walked on this planet is Sir Garfield Sobers. The status of the greatest drummer of all time Sir Donald Bradman is undisputed for more than 70 years. This may never be. None of them is Indian.
(AFP Image)
More than half a century of observation and (eventually) writing on cricket, my "favorite" or my "best" Pataudi, Norm O's Neil, Bedi, Gavaskar, Imran, Miandad, Kapil, Botham, Lille, Roy Dias, Wasim Akram, Tendulkar, Donald, Dravid, Dhoni and many others and now Kohli .
I may miss some names, but it's a motley mix of players from around the world of cricket, not just India. I think this would be symptomatic of the vast majority of fans and critics of the cricket world, but that does not dampen their sense of patriotism.
Fortunately, the recognition of the genius of a Federer, Messi, Serena Williams, Ronaldo, Bolt, Richards, Tendulkar or Kohli – to name a few – is not limited to their own country.
Knowing that Kohli is currently at the top of the cricket scene and idolizes in the world of cricket, the irony of his severe response to the provocation of the fan was unmistakable.
Some observers point out the "superstar" syndrome in modern times (sport is one of the most important components), which offers a feeling of disdain for the protagonist / player in which he / she is cocooné
An extraordinary celebrity, undiluted adulation, extraordinary riches, millions of followers on social networks and others, as has been demonstrated by many celebrities, can create a selfish universe that can obscure reality and reason.
Not being an expert in this field, I will refrain from indulging in unnecessary pop psychology. It may well be that Kohli, by launching his new application that day, is in an impatient state of mind, or simply badly capped.
In all fairness, I have never seen him react negatively in this way. He is a tempestuous character and visibly very proud of himself, his team and his country, in which also resides much of his appeal. But he has always been willing to recognize the performance of opponents and players from other countries.
His post-match lectures are of impeccable phrasing, and if I may say so, it's even better when he (or his team) does not not played. t done well. There is no letting go of money or blame. Kohli is doing well and gives even better merit when he must.
All in all, the explosion is an enigma. But whether Kohli's reaction was deep or instinctive, he was still holding the bat in the wrong direction. Or, he prefers this spelling.
First published: November 10, 2018, 13:47 HST
[ad_2]
Source link
