[ad_1]
Avengers: Endgame has left us all. At the end of the film, while the entire Marvel superhero team was saying goodbye to Tony Stark – the original Avenger who had launched everything – it was also us, the spectator, who were saying goodbye , not just an iconic character. but to a decade of movies that we all literally grew up watching.
But now that Phase 3 of the Marvel Film Universe (MCU) officially ends with the release of from Spiderman: Far From Home in July, an event already reported by Endgame [19659005] it is time to look back and, at the same time, move forward. The final phase saw not only the death of Tony Stark, but also the retirement of Steve Rogers, the mantle of Captain America having been transmitted to the Falcon. Essentially, phase 4 of MCU, when it will be announced, would be considerably different from that of the MCUs we watched grow. And that raises a very important question. As the mantle of safeguarding our universe pbades to a new generation of superheroes, with Spiderman, Black Panther, Doctor Strange and Captain Marvel in the lead, a bit like Tony Stark-Steve Rogers-Thor-Hulk- Black Wid The first three phases, the question that now arises to the public is whether the new Avengers are as successful in attracting the crowd to the cineplex as the original Avengers.
Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson), Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Captain America (Chris Evans), Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner), Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr) and The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo) in a still from The Avengers (2012)
Because, cumulatively, the first decade of films MCU, of Iron Man [19659002] to Endgam became the most profitable film franchise in cinematographic history, with Endgame about to beat [19659004] Avatar and claims his position as more rude in the history of the film. What made the original Avengers so attractive?
For starters, characters like Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, Hulk and Spiderman are, to begin with, those who love the world of comics. last names, and have been so long before MCU has become a reality on the big screen. What Marvel did in the first three phases was to select and reinvent arcs of stories from various comic strips, to such an extent that they only have a superficial similarity to the sources. Therefore, the first three phases, focusing openly around the Infinity Stones with Thanos as a great supervillain villain, were extracted from the Infinity Saga plot in the comics, and yet, when the two sources are compared, they have no resemblance outside as such. . But perhaps Marvel really innovated is to anchor these superheroes in a too familiar world and make them more likely. And they did it not only by infusing abundant doses of humor.
The character of Thor in Endgame for example, was upset. This new alcoholic and overflowing superhero has more similarities to The Dude's character in The Big Lebowski than any clbadic comic-based movie. And yes, a lot of humor in this film, despite its very dark premise, comes at the expense of Thor. This kind of humor not only humanized the characters, tying them more, but also made the comic book concept more fun, for which comics have always been known.
Chris Hemsworth was shown as overweight in Thor in Avengers: Endgame
This is exactly where DC failed. Aside from Christopher Nolan's trilogy Batman the new DC universe did not take off because the designers were not certain of the characters, but they played it cautiously and took themselves too seriously. On the contrary, since the very first Iron Man in 2006, Marvel has constantly pushed the boundaries, reinventing characters, reversing existing cinematic tropes and freely mixing genres. Therefore, the mbad success of the original Avengers is not due to the fact that the characters have an intrinsically unique character, but rather to the way Marvel has approached them in a cinematic way. It just made the superheroes cool, easy to tell, and broke the myth that in order to make a cartoon-based movie, it's not necessarily melancholy and dark. It is true that, if you compare, Batman is more recognizable and iconic in the public consciousness than Iron Man, to a point where even a non-author of cartoon books would at least know who Bruce Wayne really is. But after 2006, you can not say the same anymore and Tony Stark has really gained a place in our collective memory.
Go ahead with phase 4
But that was phase 3. Does this mean that Marvel would use the same formula to also enter the new phases? This seems unlikely. Apart from the character of Spiderman, the other new leaders of Avengers are still relatively unknown. Yes Black Panther, Captain Marvel and Doctor Strange became popular after their introduction in phase 3. But to truly take the place of the original Avengers, the authors and filmmakers of MCU – whatever they are then – will have to find an interesting answer. arches from the vast library of existing comics. More than anything, Marvel must also understand that their formula, which worked for the first three phases, might not work in phase 4, for the simple reason that a superhero fatigue could be installed. And if Marvel manages to appear, these new Avengers will unfortunately have to endure the shock.
To avoid this fatigue, Marvel must innovate and subvert even his own formulas, which have now begun to be engraved in marble. More than fun, they must take even bolder risks. Captain Marvel for example, presented such a risk and was worth it. Although the film and Brie Larson have had to bear the burden of some fandom toxic critics, the fact that Marvel is moving forward is in itself a comforting event. Marvel must understand that it is not always possible to please fans and that new movies should never be victimized by fans. If there was one thing that the first decade did, it was that she kept a length of time ahead of the fans, never letting their expectations be alleviated. . Fan expectations can sometimes be overwhelming and, frankly, stupid. And yet, the first decade has shown us that these films can exist only in themselves, while serving as binding tissues for something greater. That's precisely what made the original Avengers so popular, and that's why half of the world's population is still mourning after Tony Stark's pbading.
Doctor Strange ( Benedict Cumberbatch), Black Panther (Chadwick Boseman), Captain Marvel (Brie Larson) and Spider-Man (Tom Holland) will probably compose Phase 4 of Marvel Cinematic Universe
In our opinion, MCU is in good hands with the new characters . Spiderman films have earned a prominent place in public consciousness and Tom Holland has managed to make himself loved by anchoring Spiderman well in the world of high school and teenagers, something that Toby Macguire did not do. Similarly, Captain Marvel got his place in the MCU with a very subversive film, which really brought out the worry of being a female superhero in a predominantly male world. Black Panther also reversed racial stereotypes, and one remains curious to know what new dimensions the character would make in the next batch of movies. Perhaps the weakest link in all of this is Dr. Strange. Benedict Cumberbatch is excellent, there is no doubt. But his title film has failed to impress many fans simply because there is nothing unpredictable. It would be interesting to see what Marvel does with this character.
In the future, it would seem that Marvel knows the dangers that lie ahead and that is why it has not yet announced a concrete project for the future. Whether these new Avengers manage to attract the crowd or succumb to superhero fatigue, only time will tell. But it is safe to badume that they are all in good hands.
<! –
Publication date: May 21, 2019 11:38 am
| Last Updated: May 21, 2019 11h38
->
Date Updated: May 21, 2019 11:38:02 HIST
Your guide to the latest news, badysis, reviews, live commentary and schedule of Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on firstpost.com/elections. Follow us on Twitter and Instagram or check out our Facebook page for updates to the 543 constituencies of the next general election.
<! –
->
<! –
->
[ad_2]
Source link
