Madras HC asks ISPs to block 12,000 hacking websites before Rajinikanth's release – Entertainment News, Firstpost



[ad_1]

In front of Rajinikanth-starrer 2.0 released Thursday, November 29, the Madras High Court ordered 37 ISPs to block more than 12,000 websites featuring pirated versions of Tamil films.

  Rajinkanth and Akshay Kumar in a promotional video of 2.0

Rajinkanth and Akshay Kumar in a promotional photograph of 2.0

The list includes more than 2,000 websites run by Tamil Rockers. Judge M Sundar placed the order on Wednesday while authorizing a plea by the film's producer, Lyca Productions Private Limited.

Lyca's lawyer, Vijayan Subramanian, produced an exhaustive list of 12,564 illegal websites. The lawyer claimed that when the Tamil Rockers website is blocked, he immediately creates mirror websites by modifying a non-significant part of the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) or any other extension, and so is able to restore the content of the offense with a minimum of effort.

Subramanian produced a probable list of extensions of Tamil Rockers and requested an injunction against all these sites. According to Lyca, his last company is 2.0 with Rajinikanth, Akshay Kumar, Amy Jackson and others. The film was directed by S. Shankar.

The producer has invested substantial sums of money in the production of the film, which should be released on more than 7,000 screens in India and around the world. The film is released in more than five languages, including Mandarin in China.

The trailer for the promotion of the film has been published. The official trailer, posted on YouTube, has already collected 13,089,498 views, the lawyer said.

Although the company has acquired all rights of exploitation and distribution, including those related to theater and music, in addition to other rights, including television, Internet, digital video and domestic video Under the Copyright Act, she feared that such illegal websites would display pirated versions of the movie shortly after it was released.

According to the lawyer, the web pages and websites providing such links are numerous and are distributed worldwide. . The company claimed that these websites are allowed to be viewed in India through various Internet service providers, such as the 37 listed in the plea.

<! –

Publication date: Nov. 29, 2018 at 1:48 pm
| Updated on November 29, 2018 13h48

->

Date Updated: Nov. 29, 2018 1h48


<! –

->

[ad_2]
Source link