Partisan battle lines remain firm after Brett Kavanaugh's nomination | Law



[ad_1]

The day after Brett Kavanaugh's appointment to the Supreme Court, the partisan battle lines in the Senate remained unshakeable in the next confirmation fight.

Democrats remained firmly committed to blocking Kavanaugh's nomination as Republicans praised his qualifications. With the absence of Arizona Senator John McCain due to poor health, the Senate currently consists of 50 Republicans and 49 Democrats.

Democrats specifically target two pro-choice Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. But the two Republicans dodged journalists' questions Tuesday and gave little sign that they were opposed to the choice.

Collins congratulated Kavanaugh. "It will be very difficult for anyone to claim that he is not qualified for the job.He is clearly qualified for the job," said the Maine Republican. She added that she always wanted "to have the opportunity to sit down with him one by one and to get a better sense of his judicial philosophy."





  Senator Susan Collins at Capitol Hill on Tuesday.



Senator Susan Collins at Capitol Hill Tuesday. Photography: Al Drago / Getty Images

Murkowski told reporters that "there is a lot to do with Judge Kavanaugh", but said that she needed a "deeper examination" to give "more reaction". Meanwhile, Republicans are hoping that Kavanaugh can get bipartisan support and seek to rally Democrats for reelection in the states that Trump easily won in 2016, like Joe Donnelly of Indiana and Joe Manchin of the United States. Where is. Virginia

Red State Democrats also kept the spirit open on Tuesday. Sherron Brown of Ohio said, "I will make a decision after meeting with him." He said that he was particularly concerned about how Kavanaugh could rule in cases concerning the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

"There are millions of Ohio residents who could lose their confidence if these five men on the ground remove their consumer protections from pre-existing conditions," Brown said.

Doug Jones of Alabama told The Guardian: "Now we have a candidate, it's a first step" but no other opinion on the nomination at the moment. "I'm going to do proof of due diligence, exercising independent control and having independent judgment so as not to have feelings in one way or another, "said the Democrat of Alabama





. [19659012] Doug Jones talks with reporters in the US Capitol metro on Tuesday.Photo: Alex Edelman / Getty Images
</figcaption></figure>
<p>  One of four senators who is already facing a $ 1.4 million advertising campaign from those who want to see Kavanaugh confirmed, Jones has expressed his disappointment with the phenomenon. "I think it's a shame that people are spending millions of dollars in a political campaign for supreme justice.We must go back to what the editors thought." </p>
<p>  A new wrinkle has emerged that the Democrats added Kavanaugh's critique of Kavanaugh's views of executive authority to long-planned critics that a Trump candidate would seek to invalidate the Affordable Care Act and overthrow Roe v. Patauger. </p>
<p>  Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer accused Trump of "choosing the candidate who would best protect him from the Mueller investigation" while New Jersey's Cory Booker warned that Trump "chose the person who wrote that he should have immunity "</p>
<p>  The controversy stems from a 2009 article on the revision of the law drafted by Kavanaugh where he argued that Congress should consider a law exempting a presiding judge from prosecution.He thought the indictment was an adequate check, "if a president does something cowardly". </p>
<aside clbad=

This criticism was dismissed by Republicans. Jeff Flake of l & # 39; Arizona said of the article: "Frankly, it was when Obama was president, so if someone was trying to draw a line on him being easy on Trump, it's not there . "

No confirmation hearing has yet been scheduled Kavanaugh but The judicial candidate will meet Wednesday Orrin Hatch of Utah, a seven-term senator and former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

[ad_2]
Source link