[ad_1]
In simple terms, do not question QT's decision-making process
For Some Background – Margot Robbie is not a faded flower. As illustrated by the reporter who posed the offending issue, she did not have the weight of film production, and she would surely have said if she had had a problem with the way Tarantino treated her turn as a convict Sharon Tate.
So there was objectively a little presumption in the interrogator asking the director: "Why that's what we do … do you hear it talk a lot? "
Tarantino's answer does not seem so unreasonable in this particular situation. "Well, I'm just rejecting your hypothesis."
In other words, "where do you even come from with this?"
followed by Robbie. "I have plenty of time to explore the character even without talking to myself.I rarely spend so much time alone playing a character.It was actually an interesting thing to do for me as a" person. " actor."
Online the reactions to the exchange have been everywhere.
Two things are true here. Quentin Tarantino wrote some of the most powerful female characters in the film, as pointed out by various Twitter users. Jackie Brown Kill Bill (disproportionately), even the women of Pulp Fiction are three-dimensional dolls, complicated and far from being objectified.
But Tarantino too, probably out of irritation (and he looked more angry than "outraged"), missed an opportunity to throw those things at the reporter's face. It was a bit like an attempt to create a controversy based on a false premise – especially the reaction to the film was almost always positive, with some critics calling it a supreme achievement.
In the end, the real winner was Margot Robbie. She managed the delicate moment with a masterful badurance and a word economy.
We'll see how she plays Sharon Tate when Once upon a time … in Hollywood was in theaters everywhere on July 26
[ad_2]
Source link