Supreme Court verdict on BCCI draft constitution to resolve conflict between Board-CoA and end of turmoil in Indian cricket – Firstcricket News, Firstpost



[ad_1]

Supreme Court Judgment on BCCI's Draft Constitution, Scheduled for Thursday, Means Hope

The SC-appointed Committee of Directors (CoA) hoped to have full control of BCCI before the constitution is in place and elections are taking place. Council members, on the other hand, hope that there will be some relief on some issues related to the Lodha panel report.

India's Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Judge AM Khanwilkar and Judge DY Chandrachud earlier asked the BCCI and its units to submit suggestions on Lodha's reforms across the country. Amicus Curiae.

  Image of representation. AFP

Image of representation. AFP

The Lodha reforms were accepted by the court in 2016, with BCCI and Amicus Curiae supposed to contribute to the draft constitution. BCCI believes that his grievances regarding the age limit of 70, a term of one vote and a cooling off period for board members are genuine and need to be reconsidered. He also believes that the granting of full membership to the Northeast States and their participation in BCCI's first-clbad cricket should be progressive.

BCCI believes that North-Eastern states should be integrated into the Council. , lack of cricket culture in these areas needs to be addressed before they are gradually integrated.

These points have struck a jarring note since Lodha's panel reforms were announced. The CS obviously saw some merit in the arguments of the BCCI, otherwise the question would not have dragged for a long time

Meanwhile, one feels more and more that the stalemate between the BCCI and CoA has considerably weakened the Council in its relations with the ICC.

It took a shot of over $ 200 million when the concept of the "Big Three" initiated by him was rejected by the ICC's machinations. A helpless CoA did not have the guts or the ability to run the tightrope before the Champions Trophy, and yielded obediently.

It is inconceivable that N Srinivasan or Sharad Pawar or the late Jagmohan Dalmiya got away with it so easily. allowed the ICC to drive hard on the BCCI. Other countries would not have opposed so fiercely to India.

Similarly, there is a real fear that the World Test Championship will be postponed when the BCCI is not represented by strong men. The latest statement of status in court allegedly stated that BCCI members hindered the functioning of the committee. This seems to be his excuse for not working with the expected efficiency.

Surely, if the CoA has not been able to launch BCCI satisfactorily these last 18 months despite the support of SC, there is no guarantee that they would be able to do it. another 18 months.

Vinod Rai, who after being appointed CoA leader, said that his work with BCCI would be completed in October 2017, was probably unaware of the magnitude of his task. Meanwhile, his four-member team has been reduced to two, and in turn he has crossed the age of 70.

Many expected that he would respect the sanctity of the Lodha reforms – which took 70 years on BCCI officials – and resigned as soon as he turned 70 years old. He did nothing of the kind and left it to the Court to decide the matter. This has also upset the members of the BCCI, who believe that there can be two criteria for the same rule.

Other than that, it is pretty obvious that the administration of Indian cricket took a hit in the last two years. It is no secret that India, which provides maximum income to international cricket, has been marginalized to the extent that the BCCI has little influence on ICC affairs. This will affect Indian cricket.

At the grbadroots level, state badociations lack funds for infrastructure, which will also have a significant impact on the development of the game. The National Cricket Academy needs a urgent review of its operation, and it would be a blow if it was allowed to rot.

Considering this, cricket fans would carefully follow the dictate of the court, scheduled for Thursday. Cricket can only succeed internationally if its base is solid and works well. Unfortunately, this is not the case right now. Fortunately, the momentum benefits the national teams.

A hasty conclusion of the case would be a boost.

<! –

Date of publication: 05 July 2018

| Last Updated: 05 July 2018

->

Last Updated: July 5, 2018

[ad_2]
Source link