[ad_1]
Verdict of the Supreme Court LATEST UPDATES: Before the Supreme Court's verdict on the power struggle in Delhi, PAA spokesman Saurabh Bharadwaj tweeted "reminders" against the government Narendra Modi. "The AAP government was formed in February 2015. Three months later, the Modi government made this notification that took away the government's services from the AAP, which means that the Sheila Dixit government had full control over its agents / employees, the Kejriwal government, "he said
Will it be the chief mining officer of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal or the Center, represented by Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal? The Supreme Court is more likely to pronounce its verdict on who controls the reins of power to administer Delhi.
A constitutional court composed of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Judge AK Sikri, Judge AM Khanwilkar, Judge DY Chandrachud and Judge Ashok Bhushan reserved the verdict on the disputed issue between the Center and the AAP Government on December 6 last year after hearing the case for 15 days.
The Delhi government had moved the apex court to challenge a verdict of the Delhi High Court that ruled that the LG took precedence over an elected government in the Delhi administration.
Image of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal with Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal. PTI
Affirming that he had the executive powers on which he could badist and advise the L-G, the Kejriwal government had argued that an elected government could not be subject to L-G supreme authority. The Delhi government also argued that it was only in an emergency situation that the LG can refer to the President the topics on which there are differences of opinion between the LG and the elected government.
The Delhi Government also argued that constitutional provisions can be interpreted solely to advance the objectives of the Constitution and the democratic aspirations of the people. On the other hand, the Center argued that all the executive powers to administer the national capital were vested in it and that it exercised the same authority through the GL.
The Center told the court that "help and advice" the government did not bind the LG, as was the case for other states.
Although the Center sought to emphasize the pivotal position enjoyed by the Lt Governor in the Delhi administration, the Supreme Court stated that shows "constitutional statehood" in the treatment of an elected government .
[ad_2]
Source link
