[ad_1]
Tanushree Dutta objected to the B-Summary report filed by the Oshiwara Police Station who had given Nana Patekar an undivided boost in the badual harbadment case that & # 039; She had filed against him.
She was represented by her lawyer, legal attorney Nitin Satpute at Railway Mobile Court, Andheri, Mumbai
The court granted her time to file a motion to protest the B-Summary report . All Tanushree's legal team was present. However, no officer of the Oshiwara Police Station was present in the courtroom. The case was adjourned to September 7, 2019.
Tanushree Dutta objected to the B-Summary Report.
In October of last year, Tanushree filed a GIR against Nana for behaving inappropriately with her on the trays of the 2008 Horn Ok Plebadss movie. She said that he had tried forcefully to insert some intimate steps into the choreography. Director Rakesh Sarang, choreographer Ganesh Acharya and producer Sami Siddiqui were also named in this affair. After that, police questioned the witnesses present at the 2008 incident.
The Oshiwara police station in Mumbai gave Nana Patekar a blank paper as she could find no evidence against he can file a complaint and be judged. In fact, the report stated that the complaint could have been filed for revenge and appeared "malicious and dummy". The conclusion and conclusions of the report indicated that after many investigations, there was no solid evidence against Nana Patekar, Sarang, Ganesh Acharya and Siddiqui.
The 13 witnesses, including the choreographer Daisy Shah, the Tanushree hairdresser, the stain boy baderted in their statements to have seen or witnessed any act or incident of this type where Nana allegedly attempted to harbad Tanushree badually.
In an interview with Bombay Times, Tanushree Dutta described the development as "disgusting" and claimed that there was no evidence because the statements of all of her witnesses were not even recorded.
"It's disgusting, because Nana Patekar has been trying to get an absolute score for a while now, and I also mentioned earlier in an interview that our witnesses have received threatening calls and that they are intimidated and pressured in any way that they do not register their statements with the police, a statement and a half was recorded.The others did not even manifest themselves, because they have received threatening calls, "she said.
"The police say that there is no evidence How will credible evidence be produced if the accused badures that no evidence against He does not get to the police The witnesses whose statements were recorded by the police (in his favor) are his friends, and from the unit present at the time of the shooting, no one was really my friend. did not say that nothing had happened, they said, they do not remember anything, "she added.
For her part, Nana Patekar stated that such an incident could have occurred since there were about 50 people on the set.
(Contributions of Divyesh Singh)
[1945911] TO READ ALSO | Nana Patekar on the charges of Tanushree Dutta: I will see what I can do legally
Tanushree Dutta says that Ajay Devgn is really ridiculous and hypocrite for having worked with Alok Nath in De Pyaar From
Tanushree Dutta must publicly apologize, says Nana Patekar's lawyer
Source link
