[ad_1]
The judge stated that the content of the FIR was not a sufficient ground to sue the accused because it appears "vague" and inherently absurd.
PTI
Last updated: May 21, 2019, High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashes badual badault against Jeetendra actor "title =" High Court of Himachal Pradesh cancels one badual badault against a Jeetendra actor "/>
An archive photo of Jeetendra.
<19659006]! –
->
Judge Ajay Mohan Goel on Monday dismissed the RIP filed on February 16 of last year under section 354 (badault or criminal force inflicted on a woman with intent to scandalize her life). modesty) of the IPC.
The offense is punishable by a term of two years imprisonment.
<! –
->
In his 26-page judgment, Judge Goel found credible the badertion of the actor that the FIR was "in bad faith", the woman's daughter having been rejected during an audition by Balaji Motion Pictures Limited, led by Jeetendra's family.
The judge stated that the content of the FIR was not a sufficient ground to prosecute the accused, as they appear "vague" and inherently absurd.
In the FIR, Jeetendra's cousin alleged that the badault had occurred in 1971 when the actor took him to a hotel room in Shimla.
The room had two separate beds. While she slept, he would have joined the two beds and tried to scandalize his modesty.
He was drunk at that time, she said.
Jeetendra's cousin claimed prior to the FIR's registration that the #MeToo campaign against baduality harbadment encouraged him to speak out against "abuses".
In 1971, she was 18 years old while Jeetendra was 28 years old.
[ad_2]
Source link
