[ad_1]
If one believes the industry 's folklore, a big star refused to perform at a prize – giving ceremony when she learned that she was not a fan. one of his most famous contemporaries had been rewarded even though there was not a single statement issued by this one. credit in the year. The organizers did their best to calm the star, who also had a rather successful year. They even went so far as to say that next year they could do something similar for her but nothing seemed to work. Finally, according to legend, a "special" prize was hastily made and that's how the show unfolded. These were not Filmfare awards, but most of the film awards have come to such a point that a tightrope walk to leave no one unsatisfied seems to be the most important function.
Ayushmann Khurrana with his Best Actor Award – Critic's Choice Award. Twitter
Last year, Filmfare received a lot of criticism for not even appointing Rajkummar Rao for his performances in Newton and Trapped . One of the most promising actors of his generation, Rao showed an excellent job in the Newton and Trapped, and the snub was far too visible. Far from mourning, Rao seemed to have evoked his inner Rumi. As the poet-philosopher has imagined, all you lose comes back in another form: Rao ended up "winning" the title of best actor in the category Critic's Choice. Last year, Filmfare was a great success, giving Irrfan the Best Actor Award for Hindi Medium an action that would surely have left the actor shocked and surprised. But this year, awarding the award for Best Actor to Ranbir Kapoor ( Sanju ), then "compensating" Ranveer Singh and Ayushmann Khurrana with the Critics' Choice Award for Padmaavat and . Andhadhun respectively, Filmfare seems to have taken a big step backwards.
Among all the categories of the Filmfare Awards, the Critics' Choice Award would be by far the most "insulting", failing a word, category. This seems to suggest somewhere that any actor, which is not "traditional" enough, would be recognized in this category. The origins of the category also insinuate the same. It was in 1991 that Anupam Kher's performance in Daddy of Mahesh Bhatt became the first recipient of the award. In its early days, the price was not specific to any bad and, in 1992, when no one received it, it became apparent that it was not a problem. an ordinary category. Curiously, 1992 was the year when this prize could have saved a lot of embarrbadment when Anil Kapoor ended up winning the Best Actor Award for Beta when the general consensus was that Amir Khan was in . Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar (1992) would have it.
In 1993, Dimple Kapadia received the Critics' Choice Award for Rudaali and in 1994, Shah Rukh Khan achieved a double blow by winning both the prize of the public and the price of the choice of critics. Best Actor for Baazigar and Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa respectively. The reason for differentiating Khan's performance is still unclear. The next three years, Farida Jalal ( Mammo ) once won and Manisha Koirala twice ( Bombay Khamoshi: The Musical ), after which the categories were separated for men and women.
The category Critics' Choice is where Tabu won four wins and Manisha Koirala three times. Koirala is also the only Hindi film to win a Filmfare for a non-Hindi film, as Bombay was dubbed in Hindi. This is also the category in which Amitabh Bachchan and Manoj Bajpayee have won three times each, and there have been two cases of equality – Shahid Kapoor and Manoj Bajpai for Udta Punjab and Aligarh respectively (2017) and this year.
In some respects, Irrfan's victory last year might not seem radical given the competition – Akshay Kumar ( Toilets: a history of ), Ayushmann Khurrana ( Shubh Mangal Saavdhan ]), Hrithik Roshan ( Kaabil ), Shah Rukh Khan ( Raees ) and Varun Dhawan ( Badrinath Ki Dulhania ). More than anything else, it's the way Irrfan beat the seemingly "popular" stars that made her interesting. In the early 1980s, when Amol Palekar, Naseeruddin Shah and Om Puri or Shabana Azmi and Smita Patil could beat the popular stars to win the "main prize", so why this sub-category? Moreover, at the present time, when the content is the real king, such a demarcation makes no sense.
<! –
Publication date: 25 March 2019 15:07
| Last Updated: March 25, 2019 3:07 pm
->
Date Updated: March 25, 2019 3:07:20 PM HIST
<! –
->
[ad_2]
Source link
