[ad_1]
Star creator Sabyasachi Mukherjee found herself in a new controversy after a first dip "plebiscite" and a "feminine" makeup in an Instagram post, then a second post for the mansplain. That did not win him the pardon of social media, on the contrary. First, Sabyasachi said that women wearing what could be considered an OTT look are fractured inside; then he said that they were perhaps suffering from mental illness and that he had been using clothes to deal with depression during his teenage years. His calculation of fashion, beauty and emotional damage was firmly rejected in the commentaries, where Sabyasachi was trained on many levels.
Many comments on Sabyasachi's second article reprimanded him for using his own battle against mental illness to formulate badumptions. Judge others – the same thing that he advocates in his position. "Your depression is not a justification.Mental health should not be romanticized.You do not talk for women," said a comment. "The first step in this empathy would probably be not to categorize women as over-dressed, under-dressed or labeled as such," read another; "Do you realize that you are doing exactly the same? Assuming that a person likes to dress well because it's" broken, "it's also a judgment," reads a third. comment; others have called this post "no excuses", "damage control" and "concealment".
Sabyasachi's first message was received with almost unanimous outrage. A furious comment reminded the creator that his own creations promote a sensitivity that, in his opinion, is a symptom of "injury": "Imagine having won everything by selling to the woman this idea of beauty requiring exorbitant expenditure to preserve its aestheticism and shaming them exactly for that. "Another agreed:" By this definition, each of your brides is a "broken" woman. " A third comment said: "Stop selling that melancholy idea of" oversized women who are hurt "to sell your expensive and garish jewelry – patronize and absolutely abominable."
On Sunday, three days after his first post in which he had called "Sabyasachi issued a sequel in which he badociates what he described as" sticky or inappropriate "outfits to mental health and revealed that he had himself fought against depression in adolescence and had used "radical clothing choices" – for which he says that he was a victim of intimidation – as a Sabyasachi apologized for making a "cover statement" in his first controversial message, but he seemed to stick to the essence of his argument that women were using clothing and makeup to mask the emotional damage – many women, Sabyasachi wrote in her second post, use fashion as therapy to fill gaps and gaps in their lives. "It turned out that her articles and her reflections pro Based on the inner life of women were intended to promote her new jewelry collection, inspired by the new Tagore Monihara, in which the female protagonist shares her personal problems with an obsession for jewelry.
Read his posts here:
I've thought a lot about the question, but sometimes it's important to set the record straight and get the message right. Having been in the fashion industry for over 20 years, I've met and commented on it in many interviews: how, while many women use fashion and beauty for joy and joy. Self-expression, others use it as "retail therapy" to fill gaps and gaps in their lives. As a society, we are often extremely critical of people's clothing choices, which we call "over-dressed", "tights" or "inappropriate". We fail to understand that some may use these mechanisms as a means of adaptation to show courage and compensate for the lack of a support system. The real essence of this position was to ask people to become aware of, empathize and not to make judgments about each other's clothing choices, which could be a manifestation of their inner anxiety. One of the biggest problems in today's society, which very few people approach, is mental health, and a bit of awareness, empathy and kindness go a long way towards recognizing it. I have struggled with debilitating depression in adolescence for 7 years. I found my coping mechanism through radical clothing choices. I laughed at myself and I was bullied, but it helped me find my way back. When creating this jewelry collection, I referred to Monihara Tagore because it deals with these issues, which are unfortunately more relevant today. And for my part, I have never hesitated to speak of uncomfortable truths, as disturbing as they are for my personal benefit. Because when power is given, social responsibility should not be avoided. The mistake, however, has been to use the reference as a general statement, because sometimes when we are pbadionate about a problem, we end up becoming overzealous and as a result, we become deaf. My sincere apologies for that. The original message (despite its flaws) was set up to invite introspection and debate on how love, sensitivity and compbadion, alongside art expressions, beauty and fashion can create a net positive in the world. I invite everyone to participate democratically in this debate. Regards, Sabyasachi
Sabyasachi seems to find himself regularly in a controversy of his own creation. Last year, he was pilloried for claiming to have dressed the actress Deepika Padukone for her wedding in Italy. After writing in Sabyasachi & # 39; in a wedding fashion article, the creator was forced to retract and credit the Bengaluru Angadi Gallery store to which the marriage of Deepika kanjeevaram had been purchased. A few years ago, Sabyasachi also aroused the scorn and fury of publicly shameful women who do not know how to drape saree s.
Receive breaking news, live reports and the latest news from India and around the world on NDTV.com. Watch any live TV action on NDTV 24×7 and NDTV India. Like us on Facebook or follow us on on Twitter and Instagram for the latest news and live updates.
Budget 2019: Find the latest news on ndtv.com/budget. Use the income tax calculator to find out your tax payable
[ad_2]
Source link
