[ad_1]
How Avengers: Endgame will end? This is probably the biggest question any Marvel fan has faced since Thanos propelled half of the universe to dust in Avengers: Infinity War . Since then, countless Avengers: theories of the final phase began to appear from left to right about what is happening in Endgame, including Dr. Strange's understanding of all the possible results Nick Fury already knowing the future and Ant-Man flying Thanos with of strange things (in a way, the latter seems unlikely).
Despite the many ideas about the Avengers: The end of the game is over . ] I'm just going out and saying it: I think I understood it. Call it a presentiment, hope, blind optimism or pride, but here's how I think Marvel Studios could summarize what is perhaps the most anticipated superhero movie of all time. Instead of challenging Thanos, the Avengers travel back in time to stop themselves … listen to me.
Before trying to convince you of my theory, let's start with what we know for sure. The end of the game marks the conclusion of Phase 3 and a narrative that began technically with Iron Man's first film in 2008. But even though the contracts of several actors of Marvel including franchise heavyweights Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans are expected to be in place after Avengers 4. In no case does Endgame represent the end of the line for the universe Marvel film. In March, Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige announced that Captain Marvel would be at the helm of future MCU films – which is great – and Spider- Man: Away from Home Black Panther 2 and Guardians of the Galaxy 3 on the horizon, so we know (at least) that these characters are definitely coming back.
At the same time, according to super depressing interviews with screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, Avengers 4 "does not do what you think it does … It's a different film from whatever you think. " the dead in Infinity War are real ("I just want to tell you that it's real, and the sooner you'll accept that, the sooner you can move on to the next stage of mourning"), which means that It is unlikely that Endgame will simply defeat the events of Infinity War, with all the missing character's magically returning to the X-Men: The Days of the Future .
We know that there is an element of time travel in Endgame. Behind the scenes, filtered photos show Captain America wearing costumes from his Phase 1 and 2 films; as in, the costumes that he wore in Captain America: The First Avenger in 2009 and Captain America: The Winter Soldier in 2014. And with Carol Danvers, who has not aged one day since 1995 in the last Endgame clip it is clear that she probably has the ability to navigate in time as easily as she can. it can in outer space (or other dimensions). Most end-of-game speculation suggests a variant of the idea that the remaining Avengers find a way to travel back in time to prevent Thanos from acquiring the Marvel Infinity Stones from the completely destroy or completely change its existence.
Image Credit: Marvel Studios / Disney
But here's what I think: see how Marvel is getting ready for Phase 4 where they basically press the reset button, little what's going on, with new characters and stories, what happens if their response is also to "reset" things, narratively speaking? What happens if, in Endgame, the Avengers defeat Thanos and repair the Universe – but does it cost them to be the Avengers?
"Your work with the Tesseract is what attracted Loki and his allies," Thor tells Nick Fury in the first film Avengers . "This is the signal to all kingdoms that the Earth is ready for a higher form of war." Perhaps the only sure way is the return of the Earth (what Captain Marvel's Kree call it) a planet "Shithole", using the stone of time to bring back the Avengers in their respective chronologies, to lead the life they were supposed to live before becoming the most powerful hero of the Earth.
Consider Captain America. Essentially invented by inventor Howard Stark in 1942 to help fight the Nazis, Tesseract's pursuit by Steve Rogers brings him aboard the giant Red Skull Valkyrie bomber, which he is forced to crash into. in the Arctic. 70 years later, the captain is discovered, resurrected and continues to fight as a member of the Avengers. But despite winning the war, defeating the bad guys, and generally saving the day in mission after mission, the only regret he's had through The First Avenger, Winter Soldier and Captain America: Civil War is to have missed her date (and spent all her life) with Peggy Carter.
Image Credit: Marvel Studios / Disney
At Iron Man, when Tony Stark holds his first press conference after being escaped captivity in Afghanistan, he wondered aloud he 'd already had doubts when making weapons with his father. After his ordeal, all of Tony's perspectives changed. "I've seen young Americans being killed by the weapons I've created to defend and protect them. And I saw that I was part of a system that accepts zero responsibility, "he told reporters.
more information
Who is Hawkeye Ronin – and What does a simple change of costume mean for Avengers: Endgame?
In response, Stark announces his intention to stop making weapons and stops producing anything but one: Iron Man armor. But the existence of Stark's pursuit results in its own chaos – in Iron Man 2 Ivan Drago and Justin Hammer team up to create drones that become ballistic; in Avengers: Age of Ultron Tony's artificial intelligence supposed to serve as a "combination of armor all over the world" has upsetting consequences; and in Civil War, James Rhodes is shot and partially paralyzed while he was flying in the vicinity of War Machine. The guilt of Tony Stark and the survivor is literally the basis of articles of academic caliber and the Avengers continue to suffer the consequences
If there is a recurring theme in the Marvel cinematographic universe, that's good regret. Black Widow regrets some of her past actions (what she calls "red" in her book when she talks to Hawkeye in The Avengers), Peter Quill regrets for not saying goodbye to his mother on his deathbed in Guardians of the Galaxy T & # 39; Challa regrets the fact that Wakanda never intervened to help the other black communities of Black Panther Thor regrets d & # 39; 39, having left his father and his legacy through all of Thor's films, and Bruce Banner almost always regrets becoming the Hulk. The literal definition of the word "avenger" refers to someone who takes revenge, revenge or a corrective action perceived after a past wrong.
Image Credit: Marvel Studios / Disney [19659008] But go back in time to stop the Avengers Initiative before it begins – as well as the collection of Infinity Stones who are chased around the Earth throughout the franchise – and the situation becomes normal again. If Red Skull is not a target to pursue in The First Avenger, Steve Rogers has no need to jump into the cursed plane that lands it nowadays. Instead, he stays in the 1940s with Peggy Carter. Infinity stones continually lead Loki to Earth; remove them and Thor, after his first test in New Mexico, will be able to return to Asgard (restored), having learned to be a thoughtful and humble leader.
Without incessant fighting, Clint Barton can raise his family, at least his daughter, to whom it was alluded to in a recent trailer of Endgame . Scott Lang is not forced to put himself under house arrest for his involvement in the American Civil War. He is even present in the life of his daughter. Tony Stark is still developing the captive arc reactor in Afghanistan, but perhaps he never manages to get out of the cave? Perhaps Yinsen (the scientist who first connected Stark's chest to a battery) escapes instead of Stark's arc reactor and uses it for ways other than those of Iron Man who can still benefit humanity. As you know, the world's first miniaturized sustainable fusion reactor. (I admit that this last point is a bit difficult, but you see where I'm coming from.)
Maybe this theory sounds just like crazy talk. But this allows Marvel Studios to remove its existing Avengers without killing them, while setting the process in motion to introduce a new generation of Avengers. It also allows the studio to focus on smaller stories instead of having to invent ways to recruit bigger and bigger villains who can always increase the stakes.
Image credit: Marvel Studios / Disney
Despite all that the Avengers have accomplished over the years as a temporary solution to impending crises (Loki bringing an army foreigners in Manhattan, Ultron deciding to drop a city in Europe), problems arise when the Avengers stay too long and play the role of peacekeepers in the long run. Their presence attracts threats from all over the galaxy and humanity is caught between two crossfire in the form of collateral damage. "In the eight years since Mr. Stark's announcement is Iron Man, the number of known improved people has grown exponentially. And during the same period, the number of events likely to end the world has increased at a proportional rate, "says Vision in Civil War. "Our very strength invites the challenge. The challenge incites conflict, and conflict breeds disaster. "
The original concept repeated for the Avengers, as Nick Fury himself explains, indicates that the idea was to bring together" a group of remarkable people … [and] Can work together when we have need them to fight as we could never. The key element of this idea is, when we needed it . For a decade, the public needs the Avengers and has always saved the situation. But now there is an enemy who has been able to eliminate half in an instant. Perhaps an unusual and unpredictable epic villain deserves an unusual and unpredictable epic response. To quote the Avengers, "all that is needed".
Discover how we think that Avengers: Endgame will end by the sermons of the GR team.
Source link
