[ad_1]
President Trump plans an important speech on Tuesday to announce a mbadive crackdown on the southern border, officials said Friday, staging an important piece to boost his anti-immigrant base a week before mid-term congressional elections, where Republican control of Congress is at stake.
M. Trump should use these remarks to describe his border fortification projects, including the actions of the executive that he plans to prohibit entry to migrants and asylum seekers from all over the world. Central America, and the deployment of hundreds of US Army soldiers to contribute to this effort.
According to informed people of the discussions, an attempt to reduce financial aid to the countries of Central America whose citizens are heading north is also under discussion.
Even as the president's advisers met Friday to fix their conclusions. With regard to the multi-faceted border operation, human rights groups have expressed concern over Mr. Trump's plans, calling them politically motivated and likely to violate the law. American law and international law.
The biggest concern is the executive action that Mr. Trump represents. It is virtually impossible for a large group of Central American migrants crossing Mexico through Mexico to seek refuge in the United Kingdom. United.
The plan, according to people who know him well and who speak on condition of anonymity, would include a modification of the rules governing the eligibility for asylum as well as a qualifying presidential proclamation. the said caravan of national emergency situation and prohibiting its participants.
It is unclear whether such a presidential directive would be lawful under US immigration law or international law, both of which provide for an obligation to badess the individual claims of individuals in the United States.
In addition, Mr. Trump would have a hard time proving that the caravan – a group currently estimated at 6,000 or fewer and mostly women and children, 000 miles south of the border – is a national emergency. Given the complexity of the legal problems, the plan could take months, if not years, to remove future immigrants from the United States
. Nevertheless, in his review of the strategy, Mr. Trump seemed to bet that the political impact would be more immediate. He called the caravan a "blessing in disguise" for Republicans in the run-up to the Nov. 6 elections, as it seeks to demonize its participants and link them to progressive democrats and groups.
optics before the elections, the legality of the president's action, "said Jennifer Quigley, refugee specialist at Human Rights First. "The caravan represents so few people approaching our border that it undermines the credulity of saying that it is a national emergency that requires immediate action."
The distinction could be important because the strategy envisioned by the president involves circumventing the normal federal normative process of imposing an immediate change to the rules governing asylum applications, which can only be done when the government has a "motive" valid "to do so.
As part of the plan, which is still under discussion and according to people who are familiar with the discussions but are not allowed to discuss planning, the departments of Homeland Security and Justice will jointly enact new rules that prohibit migrants crossing the border between points of entry from seeking asylum. Exceptions would be made for those at risk of torture at home.
Trump would then invoke broad presidential powers to prohibit foreigners from entering the country for reasons of national security – under the same section of the immigration law that underlay the law. travel ban – to issue a proclamation preventing migrants from crossing the southern border. plans under discussion. The scope of the directive was unclear, including whether it would apply only to persons from certain countries or to those arriving within a certain period of time.
Several refugee rights groups condemned the proposal and said they would consider taking legal action.
Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Project on Immigrant Rights, said it was "outrageous" that Mr. Trump even contemplated such moves.
"It would mean refusing to protect people who can prove that they are fleeing persecution," Jadwat said. "It would be a huge moral failure, and any project going in this direction will be the subject of a thorough legal review."
Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, said her group was also ready to challenge Trump's shares.
"We will use all the tools to prevent Trump from undermining the Constitution and international laws and introducing his administration's program to impose a ban on Latinx in any form," said Ms. Hincapié. . "We call on all communities to reject these hate policies. We can and must be better than that. "
But Mr. Trump's advisers and those who share his restrictive views on immigration say that the president has quite the executive power to close the border to a certain group.
Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, said that the US government had already put in place emergency plans to prevent certain groups of foreigners from entering the country, as it did in 1981 after the rise of Mariel In 1980, when thousands of Cubans had arrived on the US shores.
"The legal power is explicit that Congress has authorized the president to block the entry of any person or any category of people," Krikorian said.
The exercise of this power by Mr. Trump will certainly be a legal challenge, he added, "it may be useful to advance the political debate and have these laws amended so that 39 Judge Prevents President
"It's a way of focusing attention on the real problem," he said.
A senior Defense Department official said the Pentagon had already begun identifying troops on active service to deal with internal security. The ministry's request for help at the border, although the scale of the deployment still depends largely on the scope of action that Mr. Trump has decided to take. To seal the border, it would take more than 800 to 1,000 soldiers currently considered, said border state officials, who told the defense ministry that this would have a huge economic impact on their local economies.
The Ministry of Defense. is seeking an initial deployment of troops to the border next week, added the official who requested anonymity because he did not have permission to detail the plans.
The military aspect of the plan also
Adam Isacson, director of defense supervision at the Washington office in Latin America, said that with unparalleled migration figures the Government should devote its resources to dealing with what would likely be "a modest number of children and families who have fled to one of the most violent regions in the world in search of protection".
"There is no precedent in the history of the United States for the use of US military, on American soil, to prevent unarmed people from asking asylum in our country, "said Mr. Isacson.
Source link
