Cars waiting to enter the United States from Canada line up at a border checkpoint on Wednesday, September 7, 2011, near Blaine, in the United States. State of Washington. The focus on border security since 9/11 The 2001 terrorist attacks have created tensions between the government and the people of the region. (Photo: Ted S. Warren, AP)

In a series of tweets launched Thursday morning, President Donald Trump delivered his most extreme threat speech for the governments of Mexico and Central America: "If they do not stop a caravan of Hondurans trying to seek asylum in the United States, he promised to use the US military to" CLOSE THE SOUTHERN FRONTIER! "

It is unclear whether Trump is seriously considering closing the 2,000-kilometer border with Mexico completely, or whether he is taking advantage of the threat simply to bring the southern neighbors of America to cooperate, or if he is simply trying to gather his political base less than three weeks before midday elections erm.

But if the sealing of the border is on the table, this raises innumerable questions about the authority of the president in this regard, the logistics of such an effort and the extensive consequences that this would have on the ability of Americans to trade, travel and even to eat.

"A border closure, even temporary, would have dramatic and devastating economic consequences," said Peter Boogaard, a former chief of homeland security in the Obama administration. for FWD.us, an advocacy group for immigration

The first question, if Trump can close the edge Euh, it's simple to answer: yes.

"You can certainly stop people from crossing the border, be it trucks, cars or pedestrians," said Gil Kerlikowske, former US Customs and Border Protection Commissioner. . "Logistically, it is possible.The doors are closed and you say:" For now, we do not take entry. "

The foregoing examples are rare. President George W. Bush partially closed the southern border following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, demanding a full inspection of all pedestrians and vehicles on arrival, resulting in multi-day expectations. President Ronald Reagan temporarily closed entry points along the southern border in 1985 after the kidnapping and murder of a DEA officer in Mexico.

"(Reagan) wanted answers from Mexico and did not get them, so he closed the border." Thomas Homan, former Trump's immigration and customs officer, told Fox News on Thursday. "Unfortunately, Mexico was quick to find him, he was tortured and murdered, but they also arrested the perpetrators of this crime. It worked. "

More information: Trump: Help will stop for Central American countries allowing a caravan of migrants to head to the United States. United

The situation becomes more complicated if Trump plans to use Active members of the army have helped to isolate the huge sections separating these entry points, a distance of 3,000 km ranging from Brownsville (Texas) to San Diego (California).

The National Guard can certainly be deployed inside the United States. Several presidents have acted in this way, mobilizing them to help along the southern border, respond to natural disasters and contribute to the fight against drugs. Trump has already done the same, issuing an order in April that sent 2,100 National Guard soldiers to help put an end to what Trump describes as a level of "in crisis" illegal immigration.

But it is less clear that a president can order members on active service. from the army, navy, air force and navies to patrol the southern border.

Autoplay

View Thumbnails

View Captions

Last Slide Next Slide (19659021) performing national law enforcement duties. Legal and military experts have long called this law an obstacle to army deployments in the country.

"The Defense Department really does not like to use the army in this policing role – it is blurring the line," said Christine Wormuth, former undersecretary to the Department of Defense and currently Director of the Center for International Security and Defense Policy of the Rand Corporation. "The American public does not want the army to be a policeman".

But the federal government has created excesses that have allowed deployments to the country. In 1991, Congress pbaded legislation allowing the Pentagon to badist law enforcement officials at the federal and national levels in national drug operations. This led to an incident in Texas in 1997, in which a navy on a drug watchdog mission shot and killed an 18-year-old who was raising goats on his family's ranch. US law also allows the military to respond to armed insurgencies and the recovery of weapons of mbad destruction.

The Trump administration was already willing to push the legal boundaries to suppress immigration, like its travel ban enforced, punish the "sanctuary cities" and programs that protected more than one million immigrants against deportation. In summary, some military experts believe that Trump could find a way to deploy armed forces on active duty at the border in the name of national security.

"He has to work with Congress, and he has to go through some legal and bureaucratic procedures, but he can," said Frank Mora, former deputy badistant secretary of the Western Hemisphere at the Defense Department. # 39; Obama. administration.

Mora said that following this process would be "ridiculous in many ways." He added that the idea of ​​deploying armed forces on active duty along the border would not only remove more important missions, but would be a disproportionate response to prevent "women, children and young men"

"There are two hearings for this: his (political) base, just three weeks before the elections, and to intimidate our friends and allies that they are submitting and doing what the president wants," he said. Mora, now director of the director of the Kimberly Green Center of Latin America and the Caribbean of Florida International University

Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, said the National Guard was continuing its deployment along the southern border, but that the Ministry of Defense had not been instructed to provide additional support "as of Thursday afternoon.

The deterioration that would cause an economic closure would further complicate the damage it would cause in an economic way, not only in the four border states,

The US State Department estimates $ 1.7 billion in goods and services, and to hundreds of thousands of people, the border crossing every day by law. The United States gets nearly half (44%) of their fresh fruits and vegetables from Mexico, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

"There is a reason at the ports of entry," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates lower levels of legal and illegal immigration.

That's why Krikorian, who wants the Caravan migrant arrested, says Trump can not seriously consider a complete closure of the border. Krikorian thinks Trump is bluffing to force Mexico to stop the caravan for him or that he is simply taking advantage of the threat to shake the Republican base before the mid-term elections.

when they see "a caravan of migrants headed to the United States," he said. "This is part of his strength – he expresses the reaction of normal citizens to current events."

More: The Mexican government sends a federal police intercept a caravan of migrants to the United States [19659035]

Read or share this story: https://www.usatoday.com / story / news / politics / 2018/10/18 / trump-threatens-seal-southern-border-over-migrant-caravan-can-e / 1684534002 /

[ad_2]
Source link