[ad_1]
The United Nations Supreme Court today ordered the United Arab Emirates to protect the rights of Qatari citizens, beginning a bitter one-year crisis when the Gulf countries broke off ties with Doha. .
Judges at the International Court of Justice) in The Hague has made a provisional but binding decision that the UAE must allow families, including members of Qatar, to meet, and that Qatari students must have the possibility to finish their studies in the Emirates.
Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE and other allies broke off ties with Qatar on June 7, 2017, accusing Doha of supporting terrorism. Qatari citizens living in the UAE officially had only 14 days to leave the country.
But Doha denies the charges, and last month he called on the ICJ to impose emergency measures against the UAE to protect its citizens. He also accused Abu Dhabi of violating the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD).
At a hearing in late June, Qatar alleged that the United Arab Emirates was spreading a "climate of fear". The judges of the Court were in favor of Doha, ruling that the measures imposed by the United Arab Emirates could cause "irreparable harm" to Qatari citizens
. ] Judges voted by eight votes in favor of a series of precautionary measures – with seven judges against – that the UAE "must ensure that families, which include a Qatari, separated by the measures adopted by the countries united arab
The emirates … are reunited, "said Judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, President of the Republic, who also asked Qatari students to" finish their studies "in the Emirates or to obtain their academic record If they wish to study elsewhere, the UAE's measures must also be allowed "access to the courts and other judicial organs" in the country.
Qatar has welcomed today's decision, with the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs, Ahmed bin Saeed al-Rumaihi, in a tweet to raise the dispute with the Emirates, but to repair the harm done to its citizens. "
The move to international courts came a year after the breaking of ties and the imposition of punitive measures by the Gulf states accusing Doha of supporting terrorism
Other measures included the ban on Qatar Airways leaving its airspace and the closure of the only one the country's land border with Saudi Arabia.
The UAE insisted that the ICJ did not have the power to hear Qatar The Foreign Minister of the United Arab Emirates, Anwar Gargash, pointed out that the court's decision n & # 39; 39; was that "interim measures" and that a final decision on the case still remained to come in the country. months or even years to come. "The Emirates have implemented these measures in accordance with national standards after the decision of the four countries" to break ties, he said in a tweet
Saeed Alnowais, the UAE's ambbadador to the country. Bas, told the court last month was "running a public relations campaign against those states that have most criticized his policies."
"Qatar has provided no evidence of mbad expulsions or expulsions, nor any specific action to prevent Qataris from enjoying their civil rights. , Bahrain, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates also turned to the ICJ, demanding to overturn a decision in favor of Qatar, issued by the United Nations.
The Organization of the International Civil Aviation (ICAO) concluded late June that it had jurisdiction to rule on a dispute brought by Qatar, accusing its neighbors of violating an agreement However, Qatar's three neighbors want the ICJ, created in 1946 to rule on the disputes against the States, annulled the decision of ICAO, saying that its decision was "manifestly flawed and in violation of the ICAO decision".
Diplomatic efforts are have so far been powerless to resolve the crisis that has made the Con Gulf Cooperation Council composed of six nations virtually obsolete.
(This story was not reviewed by Business Standard staff and is generated automatically from a syndicated feed.)
[ad_2]
Source link
