Vikas Bahl rid of his #MeToo accusations: here's what his colleagues in the industry have to say | Bollywood



[ad_1]

When the #MeToo wave hit India, Bollywood was not spared. And among those in the industry who were called, Queen's director (2014), Vikas Bahl, was one of them. A former colleague of the director, of the now-defunct production company, Phantom Films (created by Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Madhu Mantena and Bahl) accused him of violent badual behavior last year. The production house was dissolved, while Kashyap and Motwane provided support to the victim.

To read: Kangana Ranaut's sister, Rangoli on Vikas Bahl, is struck off the accusations of MeToo: 'Tum logon ka hisab hoga'

The name of Bahl has been removed from the credits of Hrithik Roshan, the super 30 he had directed. Later, an Internal Complaints Committee (IPC) was created to investigate this case. Meanwhile, Bahl filed a 10-crore defamation suit against Motwane and Kashyap. saying that the defendants "were taking advantage of the ongoing #MeToo movement in the country".

However, on June 1, Bahl was sanctioned by the ICC; later, his credit for Super 30 was restored. The white note came at the right time, as last week it was announced that the Super 30 would finally be available in July, after much controversy over its release date. It is also reported that the complainant did not appear before the ICC despite repeated reminders.

People have always had mixed reactions. Twitter has been abuzz too. @AasthaBKhandpur wrote: "#VikasBahl has been acquitted of all harbadment charges, #AlokNath makes metoo jokes in the movies and #AnuMalik is back in #IndianIdol I want all the hours that I've spent doing so that the victims of #MeToo have returned! It's a sham and the patriarchy of this industry will never end! Another user, "RSalbadkar: If #VikasBahl has been acquitted of all #MeToo's charges, then what's wrong with his return to # Super30? he was just accused and unproven. the pseudo feminists should be screwed.

The brotherhood of the film reacts:

Sona Mohapatra, singer: In the end, there is an awareness

of what I had tweeted ("The fraternity, the filmmakers, the Filming crews, actors, actors and all participants of this industry who knows the truth should get up and want to clean this open secret? It is a systemic problem. Rehabilitation of such men will hurt us all. Their illness will manifest sooner or later .. ") is quite accurate.I think it's a systemic problem.I think it will take time to change but things are changing.After what I understand, most of the biggest production companies in the sector have signed a contract under which team members, with the exception of the stars, can complain about a problem. email or call a number if they are in an uncomfortable situation. I think it's a big positive change and that's what I focus on. Vikas Bahl, it's not something I thought about a lot. Change takes time. It's an ongoing thing and a single committee that gives a blank ballot can not be a reason to go out and say "oh he was innocent". I do not think anyone is fool enough to think that way. This is by no means a blow to the # MeToo movement, it's just a start. Awareness has been created around how to behave and not behave. Hopefully even Vikas Bahl will think twice before behaving inappropriately. So, as long as the collective is moving towards a better place, it is more important now.

Suchitra Krishnamoorthi, musician-actor: "Impossible to prove harbadment in the workplace"

This thing about badual harbadment in the workplace is alleged, which is undoubtedly a large number of between us who faced it at some point in our lives. But proving these things legally is virtually impossible. Are we supposed to go with cameras and collect evidence, are we supposed to do it at any time in our lives? So I'm not surprised that people like Vikas Bahl, Anu Malik, Alok Nath are back to work … #MeToo will stop people from behaving badly in the future, but if you treat them on a legal platform, he is doomed to failure. See court and the law is all about the evidence, he is blind to the allegation, real event. These cases were doomed to failure, but as long as they showed in the future that men can not behave badly in their workplace, they at least give precedence that women speak at least. I think it has to become open, transparent and fair. I also feel a little hypocrisy in the movement because very often, the women who speak do not take it, so I feel that they should do it with a lot of honesty and integrity and that's the only way to get things done.

Hansal Mehta, Director: If the Committee released him after due process, do not accuse him

His company conducted an investigation in accordance with the prevailing standards of badual harbadment in the country. If he is clear of all charges, we should not accuse him. This calls for stricter investigations. These internal committees may not be the right way sometimes; Although these committees are known to have external people and a lot of rules … I am sure that Reliance as a company must have followed these guidelines. I was shocked when I heard the story, the victim herself decided not to follow up on this case. So, as a third party who has not seen anything, all I will say is speculation.

Tanushree Dutta, actor

I am very disappointed with all those media reports that #MeToo is accused of trying to sneak back into Bollywood with rumors of clean tickets. What are these organizations that claim to be firing when police investigations are still pending in many of these cases? So it seems that there is a new tendency to publish news articles from those who are themselves accused of obtaining pure information from strange organizations in order to return to work and return to normal life. Very clever and ingenious idea to get by! I just want to say that no one is fool enough to believe these alleged shots from internal committees and organizations we had never heard of before. In fact, the law would mislead me, even with a pinch of salt, often because of the lack of evidence and the sheer pressure that the victims do not impose on the accused. It is very common in our country for victims to turn around for fear of lengthy court proceedings that bring shame, stigma and clumsiness to the family. I'm not surprised because I know how intelligent these people are and the tactics they will use to fight the effect of #MeToo. But my vocation in life is to raise awareness and overcome ignorance. So I'm still fighting the good fight and calling Bull * &% #!

Komal Nahata, Commerce Analyst, explains how this whole incident will affect the film industry

Not at all. Why will it affect? The public has nothing to do with the internal workings of the industry. When Rekha's husband, Mukesh Aggarwal, committed suicide, his film Phool Bane Angaray (1991) was due out in a few days. She was the hero since Rajinikath, who was the hero of the film, dies and seeks revenge. So everyone was "do not take out the movie … she's trying to get revenge for her husband's death in the movie and here she's sort of blamed for her husband's death in real life." But that did not affect the movie. After about four days, the film came and went to become a success. Like Alok Nath, people talked a lot about his presence at De De Pyaar De, but they liked him. So, they do not remember it. At first they think, but when they can forget what the actor would have done in his real life, then he is only a director, it makes no difference.

Tweets of the author @Shreya_MJ 19659002] Follow @htshowbiz for more

First published:
June 03, 2019 5:26 PM IST

[ad_2]
Source link