[ad_1]
The Royals have always had a relationship of mutual understanding with the press. At least in ancient times. Both parties would work together to present the highlights that the public aspired to while remaining respectful of truly private issues. As the press focused more on the audience, the relationship became more and more tense, to put it mildly.
In recent years, especially since Prince Harry began his relationship with Meghan Markle, this relationship has become increasingly hostile. Markle, in particular, has been the victim of racism, badism and blatant rumors. And the press feels that the royal family is stingy with information it is willing to share.
Last week, Harry and Markle announced that they were canceling the traditional baby photo shoot.
The announcement was not a big surprise
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced that at the birth of their child, they would not participate in the ritual photo shoot outside the maternity ward. The Sun, the biggest draw tabloid in Britain, blamed the couple for violating "our royal rights." https://t.co/uT56oyZnQk
– The New York Times (@nytimes) April 16, 2019
Harry and Markle clearly highlighted the fact that they did not look like other royals. They yearn for more independence and more intimacy.
There was only one licensed journalist inside St. George's Chapel for the couple's wedding last year, which greatly thwarted the countless publications that covered this much-anticipated event.
The couple who move away from Kensington Palace and take control of their own presence on social media are two other examples of their aspirations for independence and protection of privacy. They are not so under the watchful eye of the royal family at Frogmore Cottage, and they can control images and stories to share with the public if they have their own social platforms.
Prince Harry and the Press
Prince Harry's attitude to the press, and to photographers in particular, is no shock to his history with the paparazzi. He was 12 years old when his mother died in a car accident caused by his driver who was trying to escape paparazzi.
But Arthur Edwards, 78, a photographer for The Sun, who photographed Harry after his mother's birth, says he and Harry had a great working relationship.
Prince Harry: Issues an unprecedented statement calling on the press to end racist and badist attacks on Meghan
Royal Journalists: Continue to attack Meghan with lies and badual violence
– That's it Susbad (@ThatsSoSusbad) January 28, 2019
"This is the way Harry is right now, he just got that bee in his cap that all Media must be ignored, "he told The New York Times." Harry used to be the best of them, "said Edwards. in a pub and we were talking about everything, let's take it off our plate, it would be frank and open, and you never reported it.Now, it's not even a hello.Nothing.It's treating us now like telegraph poles. "
Edwards says he is saddened by the loss of tradition. would have liked to photograph Harry as a father, as he photographed him in his mother's arm.
"I photographed Harry when he came out in Diana's arms and I would have liked to have photographed him when he came out with his own baby. This is a joyous occasion, with betting companies offering names on a board, this is a pretty important event.
He went on to note that he had noticed a change in Harry, that he looked sadder these days.
"I'm a little sad for him," he said. "Because it's becoming morose."
Read more: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle encourage youth to take steps toward social change
Discover on Facebook!
[ad_2]
Source link
