[ad_1]
By Supartono
The Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 14 of 2018 on the Acceptance of New Learners (PPDB) of May 2, 2018 has many weaknesses, thus raising various criticisms. Indeed, the regulation aims to equalize and minimize the mobility of students to certain schools. Inevitably, Wednesday (11/7), the Indonesian Commission for Child Protection has received numerous complaints from parents regarding the controversial PPDB 2018.
Among other issues, the indicators of acceptance, the zoning system and falsification of inadequate certificates SKTM) to allow students to sit more easily in the desired school. Previously, PPDB college and high school / vocational school has been criticized since the beginning of the beginning. Protests, complaints and disappointments come from parents because their children and their children are not accepted in the dream school, although the PPDB is made up of two models.
The first stage of the PPDB is that of disadvantaged economic families (KETM) (PMG) and children with special needs (ABK). Then there is the path of local residents (WPS), the path of completion or non-NHUN. The second phase of the NHUN line
In some areas, especially in non-NHUN PPDB recordings, many secondary and vocational schools are not uniform in technical recording, data verification and proficiency for success story. More ironically, many economically capable learners can be admitted to a school via the KETM line, while the data is presented online.
Meanwhile, it is sadder to hear complaints from parents who register their children via PPDB NHUN. The existence of zoning system regulations, the fight of children by enterprising learning, follow an additional tutoring, and various attempts to obtain high value Pure Ebtanas (NEM) become unnecessary. His sons and daughters are less competitive than other children whose NEM is lower, but close to school.
From the description of PPDB cases in 2018, from the beginning of the registration process, selection to the announcement of many problems, PPDB year 2018 based on Permendikbud Number 14 Year 2018 less socialization. This is a good thing for elementary and secondary schools and parents.
How an official procedure for the beginning of a new academic year starting with the enrollment of learners, Minister's signature less than a month before the PPDB in 2018/2019 begins. The government, especially the Office of Education and Culture, does not know or does not know, almost every year, in order to get the ideal school, parents are willing to send the Child on the stage. This is for the high NEM
Unfortunately, the government is less concerned about the parents' struggle and even unilaterally decided by giving birth Permendikbud which is less than a month before the PPDB held in 2018. If the parents finally rush and understand less PPDB 2018, very reasonable. However, is it reasonable that there are SMP and SMA / SMK teachers who lack technical understanding of PPDB?
Rapor
A school rejects the process of re-enrolling new learners because the candidate is ineligible. Students must also include a photocopy of the 1st to 6th semester bulletin in the ADM / SMK PPDB manual.
However, until the re-registration of PPDB after receipt of Non-NHUN, the college did not print the semiannual report. 6. More sad, when parents apply for the junior high school marked the first sixth grade, there are still teachers do not have mengentri value report card. Naturally PPDB the previous year, the 6th semester report is not a requirement.
There are other ADMs / SMKs that do not make mandatory the 6th semester of compulsory secondary school for re-registration. On one side there is a school that is ordered according to the guidelines of the PPDB regulation. True, Permendikbud number 14 Year 2018 preparation and socialization is far from the implementation of tutoring for SMP and SMA / SMK by the private sector.
Permendikbud can be well prepared, but because the launch is very close to PPDB in 2018 PPDB Junior High and High School / SMK noisy due to lack of socialization. If the Indonesian Teachers' Federation finally said on Wednesday (11/7) that the understanding of some Permendikbud 14/2018 articles about PPDB and its zoning system is biased, it is right.
Dear PPDB junior and high school continued. The question is whether Permendikbud with chapter and regulation chapters have not pbaded the validation test before its publication? From these cases, the government must immediately review the chapters and articles that cause confusion in the transfer from the secondary level to SMAN / SMKN in the form of the PPDB SKTM line. In addition, it is necessary to state the reason for the article on migration dukcapil in a CoW no later than six months.
In addition, Kemendikbud and the relevant education office should carefully redefine the zoning at the village / kelurahan level. In addition, it is necessary to improve educational facilities such as the establishment of schools in each sub-district for the transfer of scale for the equal distribution of education.
In addition, parents and RT / RW act honestly related to SKTM. Making SKTM by unscrupulous families who can only attend school in the favorites can hurt other potential students.
There is no purpose to make rules and systems to harm. Likewise with Permendikbud. The goal is certainly to ensure equal distribution of education and to minimize student mobility to some schools.
The author is interested in educational problems
Source link
