Although the fast counting correspondent KPU, Quick Count Pilkada Kalbar Protestant PDIP



[ad_1]

Solopos.com, PONTIANAK – The PDIP Protests Against the Results of Quick Count Judge Denny of the Indonesian Investigation Circle (LSI) and Poltracking on the Kalimantan Election Results Western Wednesday (27/6/2018) who mentioned the Midji-Norsan pair got the highest vote. DPD President PDIP West Kalimantan, Cornelis, accused the results of the two institutions' investigation to deflect the rights of West Kalimantan citizens and academic crimes.

In a press conference held on Saturday (30/06/2018), Cornelis revealed that C & # 39; is the weakest research method in the academic context. It also explains the components of the survey that are considered irrelevant and can not be categorized scientifically and academically.

"In the context of the Kalbar elections, observational data should cover the entire region of West Kalimantan." The survey method is often irresponsible. Academically, "he said.

First, he explained, is a component coverage error .This component refers to the wide range of respondents to the survey. For example, there are about 11,500 GST data, but the survey for quick count only found 350 polling stations or less than 5% population of respondents Therefore, Cornelis calls the data non-solid.

The second is a question of sampling error .In his opinion, the system of random sampling should be uniform, and not centered on a particular place that does not ultimately represent a large respondent

"Is the Random Sampling System really dispersed? taking samples at certain locations only if it does not represent all areas in its random system, then the resulting data is manipulative and can not be accepted academically, "he explains at length

. compiled the survey results on the researchers' wishes. According to him, in the context of the election of the governor of West Kalimantan, the two surveying agencies are political consultants opposed to the match, the measurement of the results of the investigation is definitely skewed and made to herself

. "He said.

Cornelis pointed out that by the two investigative institutions is a process to justify the badumption of self.According to him, the statement that the couple Sutardmiji-Norsan won academically is a claim that has diverted the right of the people of West Kalimantan. "This is unacceptable, and the people of West Kalimantan who have embezzled their rights are considered ignorant and reputed not to understand the academic principles. 19659002] Quick Results Corresponding to the Counting of KPU

Previously, as reported by Liputan6.com LSI Fast Counting Results Mention Number Three Sutarmidji -Ria Norsan is higher. The couples who brought Golkar, Nasdem, PKB, PKS and Hanura received a 57.25% vote. This result is based on the latest incoming data of 92.96% at 18:52 Wednesday.

The Karolin couple Margaret Natasa-Suryadman Gidot was second. Couples who have carried PDIP, Democrats, and PKPI are getting 34.61 percent votes. Third, the couples worn by Gerindra and PAN Milton Crosby-Boyman Harun earned 8.15% of the vote

Data come from 355 polling stations with a 1% margin of error. The turnout was 82.63%

This result is in line with the fast count results made by Poltracking Indonesia. The results of Quick Count Poltracking show that the Sutarmidji – Ria Norsan pair won 51.0% of the vote, followed by Karolin Margret Natasa – Suryadman Gidot 41.5% and Milton Crosby – Aaron Boyman 7.5%. These data are calculated from the total input data of 100% at 18.55 WIB

The figures of both agencies are also in line with the quick calculation of the KPU version. The method used by the KPU is not a quick count that uses the sampling method, but the data entry form C1 is such that it is.

As of Friday, 29/6/2018 after data entry at 95.33%, Sutarmidji and Ria Norsan excelled at 51.95%. While Caroline Margret's Natasa-Suryadman Gidot 41.46%, and Milton Crosby-Boyman Aaron with 6.59%. These results are not the official and final results of the KPU

[ad_2]
Source link