[ad_1]
The results of the investigation have missed the results of the swift Election Count Serentak 2018.
REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, JAKARTA – The results of the sweeping elections count Serentak on June 27 and become important lessons for the survey agencies that conducted investigations. The vice president of the Gerindra Party Ferry Juliantono said that the publication of the results of several polling institutes was very far away with fast results of the election results simultaneously
Ferry highlighted especially in Pilgub West Java for the couple Sudrajat- Ahmad Syaikhu and East Java Sudirman. Ida Fauziyah. The Sudrajat-Syaikhu pair of a study of various institutions, elektabilitas and its popularity only less than 10 percent.
So also in the Central Investigation Institute of Java called the level of elektabilitas and its popularity below 10 percent. He faces Ridwan Kamil-Uu in West Java, whose popularity is over 60%. Even in Central Java (Central Java), it reached more than 70% to 80%.
While the rapid account acquisition, Sudrajat-Syaikhu reaches almost 30% and Sudirman Ida reaches 40%. He wondered that this quick result could not be recorded by an investigative agency.
"I want to convey this opportunity, the investigation the margin of error or more error ", arrived in Jabar and Central Java, "Ferry said in a discussion held in central Jakarta on Saturday (30/6).
Ferry predicts the movement of the decision-making process of the unfinished group, then decided two days before the elections. "So if we look at the results of the quick calculations in the elections, it is very different from the results of the survey, thanks to those who did not vote," he said. Didi acknowledged that surveys conducted by the polling institute of Democratic candidates for regional leaders were somewhat unfavorable.
However, it turns out that according to the results of the internal fast count, the Democrats managed to get 53-55% of the victory of the regional candidates (19659003) "There are agencies of survey that are missing far, I think that it should be explained to the public because lately the public is influenced by polls before the day of the vote.But in some areas the survey results are missing of course it's a bet on credibility, "says Didi.
Because, according to him, the polling institute became the guide and the initial reference of the people. So, if it turns out that the survey results of these institutions are not suitable, then it should be responsible.
Read: SMRC Explanation of the investigation problem missed by Quick Count .
[ad_2]
Source link
