[ad_1]
rmol. The decision of the Constitutional Court to grant judicial review of 128 letters (i) of Law 7/2017 on General Elections should be appreciated.
 |
The political observer of the Indo survey and strategy Herman Dirgantara said that the Constitutional Court's decision to ban members of political parties and members of the DPO would strengthen the legislative function of DPD . (19659003) "What was decided by the Constitutional Court as an improvement in the design of the legislative reinforcement of the DPO is a first step for DPD to play better in the struggle for the region," he told reporters Tuesday. According to Herman, the problem of the DPO is one of them is difficult to get out of all positions in the function of the legislation. DPD is a channel of regional interest, not a political party, unfortunately, because it is filled with the majority of political party officials, its role as a regional channel becomes a responsibility of party political interests policies. I think this is an improvement, "he explained.
Previously, the Constitutional Court affirmed that DPD should not be filled with the directors of pparpol. That is the implication of the decision of the Constitutional Court on the material test submitted by Muhammad Hafidz, the applicant of the material test relating to the obligation to become a member of the DPO as provided for in article 182 letter i) of the law 7 / 2017. previous decisions that political party leaders are not allowed to become members of the DPO.As a result, members of the DPD since the election of 2019 and the subsequent elections that govern political parties are contradictory with the Constitution of 1945.
The Constitutional Court also declared that the argument of Muhammad Hafidz regarding the constitutionality of section 182 (i) of the Act [wah]
[ad_2]
Source link
