[ad_1]
– Recent research shows that people who have a lot of money are more reluctant to share their wealth than those who have less money.
The conclusion was drawn from a recent study by the Queen Mary University of London published in Journal of Fundamental and Applied Social Psychology . A number of researchers conducted social experiments in which participants were invited to play with real money.
People were divided into two categories: "medium to low" or "medium to high". This status is determined by the amount of money given at the beginning to indicate the level of wealth.
The game requires participants to decide how much money they want to keep and how much to give to the group.
The determination of this wealth is determined interchangeably. Sometimes determined by luck. Sometimes this is determined by the participant's effort.
The results of the study show that participants who are in the "lower-middle" category give more money than those who hold "middle-upper" stasis. In fact, those who have a lot are more stingy when they make money than luck.
"For individuals with higher middle clbad status, the way in which they gain wealth, whether by chance or personal effort, becomes determinant. ", Said Magda Osma, a professor at the Queen Mary School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, quoted by Business Insider Sunday (1/7/2018).
"This is different from the average and lower individuals. How to earn wealth, do not change their behavior in the game. "According to Magda, if a person earns the status of rich man from his own business rather than luck, then one will prefer to keep the money earned However, when a person's wealth is limited, it becomes an incentive for him to give.
"The point here is that if someone is acting to contribute, in fact no one thinks of it. to do for altruistic reasons. Someone hoping to give more, then others too, and will certainly benefit from it, "said Magda
so there is no guarantee that game participants will perform similar practices. In other words, a person who has a "lower-middle" status takes the greatest risk by contributing more because she does not know if the other participants will do the same.
In addition, Magda also mentions another surprising finding that is the prosocial behavior with giving money to a group has nothing to do with empathy.
"There are a lot of d & # 39; Affirmations that call empathy a glue that brings people together so that they act socially. What we show is that when it comes to money, there is no empathic role in improving prosocial behavior, "he said. he said.
Editor-in-chief: Rahmat Fiansyah
Source link
