[ad_1]
Reporter Report Tribunnews.com, Yanuar Nurcholis Majid
TRIBUNNEWS.COM, JAKARTA – The Constitutional Court (MK) held a preliminary hearing on the Judicial Review of the Elections Act No. 7 of 2017 general.
12 candidates for consideration of Article 222 on the threshold of presidential and vice presidential candidacies
Read: The House of Representatives to the Attorney General discusses KPU regulations
In an audience listening to the opinion of the college judges the Chief Justice of the Group, Saldi Isra, asked the applicants to report a new constitutional problem
As a result of the 12 applicants, Saldi stated that the reasons given by the applicant had already been called into question.
Read: Duet JK Discourse -AHY, Bamsoet: Golkar still standing supports Jokowi
"Earlier, I also wanted to point out one thing to prove the reason, actually called law event" This is n '# 39; is not just an excuse, but a new constitutional reason, "said Saldi in the hearing room of the Constitutional Court, Central Jakarta, Tuesday, July 7, 2018. Saldi also requested that a lawsuit be either made this time (19459004)
"Which explains the difference of this demand and before," he said.
Met after the constitutional reform one of the applicants of Titi Anggraini who is also director of Perludem, said that the existence of Article 222 clearly cuts the constitutional origin in the presidential nomination, unlike that of 1945.
"We affirm the unknown threshold in our political constitution, "he said. Titi
reported earlier, in January 2018, the Constitutional Court also dismissed the Judicial Review of the threshold of the President.
At this point, the Anwar Usman jury recalls that one of the important substances of the 1945 Constitution Amendment is the strengthening of the presidential system of government.
This substance, said Anwar, is one of five important political agreements unanimously accepted by all factions of the 1999 RPM against the 1945 Constitution.
[ad_2]
Source link
