[ad_1]
You hate hearing about potentially important injuries, especially at the beginning of the offseason process.
The Washington Redskins began Monday the first online training session of Phase Three of the post-season program. Barely five games in the training session, linebacker Reuben Foster fell on the ground with a touch-free leg injury. Foster needed an air jet and a trolley to leave the practice area. It is not clear yet if the injury will be serious, but coach Gruden has qualified the injury as "very worrying."
The Redskins spent a lot of time on Foster. They took a big risk by demanding waivers after the 49ers released him after multiple incidents off the field. They were anxiously waiting to know if the NFL would suspend it, which they chose not to do. Now, they could potentially lose Foster for the season.
This harm opens the possibility of a trade that may not have existed before the injury. It is now possible for the Redskins to look outside their own list to add another linebacker. The Chiefs, in particular, have a linebacker, the line-up, which is better suited to the Redskins' defensive plan.
Reggie Ragland was traded from the Bills to the Chiefs on the grounds that it was not suitable for the Bills 4-3 defense. Barely a year later, the Chiefs opted for a 4-3 defense. It is unlikely that Ragland will once again agree to a change of regime. The Redskins currently have a 3-4 base defense under DC Manchester, which allows them to play perfectly.
In addition, Ragland has an allegiance that could make him more attractive to the Redskins. The Redskins have six alumnae alumni Crimson Tide in defense, including Foster, who ran for Ragland's 2015 vice-presidency in Alabama. Ragland does not offer a different skill set to Foster. He is not as fast as Foster, but Ragland is a punitive linebacker.
So who or what could Brett Veach potentially get out of the Redskins' clutches in a trade involving Ragland? Clearly, there might be a minimal compensation project as a choice of day 3, but the leaders are probably looking for a faster return on investment.
There is no doubt in my mind that General Manager Bruce Allen could try to replace cornerback Josh Norman after June 1 to free up $ 11.5 million in reserve funds. Norman did not have everything the Redskins hoped for when they signed him for a five-year, $ 75 million contract.
The Chiefs would be on the hot seat for two years and $ 24 million remaining on Norman's contract. It's a big chunk of change, but since the Chiefs are currently winning while Patrick Mahomes is still on his rookie contract, it's a deal they could afford to accept when next two seasons.
This type of player-versus-player trade could potentially be a big win for both teams. Washington would forgo a big deal with a CB that has underperformed since joining the team. They would also have a player in need. Kansas City would also add a struggling player, but would get rid of a player who no longer matched his defensive plan.
[ad_2]
Source link