[ad_1]
LONDON – The official campaign group that managed to convince the British to vote to leave the European Union was fined by the country's Electoral Commission for violating election laws during the election. The Commission imposed a fine of nearly $ 90,000 on the Vote Leave group for exceeding the spending limit imposed by UK election laws by providing additional funding to BeLeave, another group of young pro-Brexit
. "The evidence shows that BeLeave spent more than £ 675,000 with Aggregate IQ as part of a joint plan with a voting leave." Darren Grimes was fined £ 20,000 (about 26,000). $) and was reported to the police, just like David Halsall of Vote Leave.
Vote Leave issued a statement Tuesday declaring the report of the Electoral Commission "totally inaccurate" and politically motivated.
The Brexit and the government's plan to make it a reality continue to divide Britain less than a year before EU rules oblige the UK to leave the country. union – it does not matter if a negotiated exit plan has been concluded between London and Brussels
Prime Minister Theresa May inherits the monumental task of negotiating an exit agreement when she succeeded her predecessor David Cameron, who initiated the referendum in the b ut to win political influence, resigned. Last week, leading members of May's cabinet stood up for disagreements over what Brexit should look like.
May's government issued a proposal a few days ago for what has been described as "mild" Brexit; an agreement that would see the UK stay close to the EU for trade and immigration purposes.
This is not what the 51.9% of Britons who voted to leave the EU thought, say many members of May's conservative party – including Boris Johnson, leader of Brexit, who resigned from his top job The May government, acting on the referendum mandate to remove Britain from the EU, officially informed the union of the withdrawal last year, starting an account two-year countdown as stipulated by EU law. On March 29, exactly at midnight, Brussels time, Great Britain will be offside.
Unless this is not the case.
Nothing about the withdrawal process is certain. There is no precedent for this. Some in the UK who never wanted to get out of the EU quickly used the legal woes of the Vote Leave campaign to back up their argument that a new referendum should be held.
Labor Party MP Lord Adonis told the BBC on Tuesday that the Electoral Commission's report should "completely ban" all those involved in the voting rights violations and a new public vote on the decision to leave the polls. 39; EU. Vote Leave was adamant in its rejection of the Electoral Commission's report, accusing the group of being motivated by a "political agenda".
"It is amazing that no one in the ballot was interviewed by the commission during the production of this report, nor even in the last two years," the group said in a statement.
The Director General of the Electoral Commission, Claire Bbadet, told the BBC that no one had been questioned because Vote Leave had refused to respond to repeated requests
"I am disappointed that no one from Vote Leave has been interviewed Five times over the five-month period to provide someone to interview and they do not, Bbadet told the BBC on Tuesday. . She categorically rejected any suggestion that the Commission or its investigation of the Authorized Vote campaign was biased.
Opinion polls reveal a statistical reversal in majority attitudes two years after the referendum, with most saying they prefer to stay in the European Community. Union. But that's a very slim margin, and the same opinion polls wrongly predicted that Remain's camp would win the 2016 referendum.
Top EU officials publicly declared that if Britain changed their minds, before or after the March 2019 deadline, they would be happy to welcome the British into the fold.
© 2018 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.
[ad_2]Source link
