[ad_1]
Naming Sir Philip Green as the man who prevented a newspaper from publishing accusations of badual and racial harbadment was "arrogant," said former Attorney General Dominic Grieve.
Mr. Grieve told the BBC that Lord Hain violated the law and "abused" his parliamentary privilege.
Lord Hain defended to reveal his name, saying he had received "overwhelming support, especially from women".
Sir Philip says that he "categorically and totally" denies the allegations.
The Daily Telegraph first reported the injunction on Wednesday, saying that a "big business man" had won the legal battle to prevent the newspaper from printing out. confidential information "of five employees.
Lord Hain later identified the retail mogul using parliamentary privilege, which protects MPs and their peers from lawsuits for statements made in the House of Commons or in the Lords.
Addressing BBC Radio 4's World at One, Mr. Grieve said: "This was a totally arrogant decision that totally ignored the judicial process or the rule of thumb. law."
The injunction against the Telegraph was only tentative and the judges had not yet made their final decision before Lord Hain's intervention, he said.
Mr. Grieve said, "Parliamentary privilege is very important, but like any extremely important power, it can be abused, I do not see – if we look at this case in particular – that Peter Hain can badert that he did not abuse it. "
- Profile: "The King of High Street & # 39; in the face of capitalism & # 39;
- Sir Philip Green appointed for harbadment complaints
The Telegraph says that he spent eight months investigating charges of intimidation, intimidation and badual harbadment.
After being contacted for comment in July, Sir Philip and a number of senior executives have sought an injunction to prevent publication of details, the Telegraph said.
A High Court judge refused to grant the gag order the following month, but the judges of the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Sir Philip last Tuesday.
The Telegraph also reported that interviews with five Sir Philip staff members revealed that "substantial sums" had been paid in exchange for legal commitments not to discuss their alleged experiences.
The BBC has not been able to verify the allegations contained in the Telegraph's report.
While the interim order of the Court of Appeal barring the appointment of Sir Philip remains in force, Lord Hain told the House of Lords that he "felt that it was his "to identify the boss of Topshop and that it was in the public interest.
Former Neath MP said he was contacted by a person "closely involved in the case" and, given the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) "to cover up the truth about serious badual harbadment and repeated, the abuses felt that he should talk.
"Wealth, power and abuse"
Speaking later on BBC Newsnight, Lord Hain denied having interfered with a court decision, saying: "I have examined this matter extremely seriously before announcing it."
"I do not dispute the judges' responsibilities, nor their timing, nor anything like that, it's a matter for the judiciary," he said.
"I perform my duties as a parliamentarian – and what concerned me in this matter was wealth, the power that flows from it, and the abuse."
Lord Hain said his decision on social media was criticized, but that he had received "overwhelming support, especially from women."
Why was Lord Hain's intervention unexpected?
By Clive Coleman, Legal Correspondent of the BBC
People will remember the super-injunction stories of recent years, including the case of footballer Ryan Giggs. When he was appointed under a parliamentary privilege, this was frowned upon.
Parliamentarians and the judiciary were very concerned that this privilege should not be used to undermine the rule of law.
And a great effort has been made since then to ensure that this does not happen again.
It is therefore unlikely that the judiciary will be satisfied.
We have no constitutional crisis on us, but we are seeing a very important development in the use of parliamentary privilege over judicial decisions.
Labor MP Jess Phillips said Lord Hain "made the right choice," adding, "He was brave and I doubt he made the decision lightly."
Attorney Hugh Tomlinson, QC, however, said the courts were "the appropriate institutions" to decide the issues raised in this case.
Mr Tomlinson, one of the founders of the Hacked Off press campaign, said: "Parliament can not infiltrate the courts and say that we think the courts were wrong – and that's what Lord Hain is doing. "
Former Labor Interior Minister Alan Johnson also questioned Lord Hain's actions, saying the BBC needed to have a very good motive for a parliamentarian violates the decision of three high-ranking judges who had seen the evidence.
Lord Evans, the new chairman of the Committee on Standards of Public Life, told BBC Radio 4's Today show that "the ability to raise issues in Parliament without fear that they will be presented to justice is, in my opinion, an important protection for our system ". .
& # 39; Grid Worksheet & # 39;
The president of Arcadia, Sir Philip, was called to lose his knighthood if the allegations proved true, from MPs, including the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, Sir Vince Cable.
And Frank Field, of Labor, who led Sir Philip's conviction following the BHS Pension Funds scandal, said: "The charge against the knighthood is growing."
Sir Philip's recent drop in grace came after the sale of the BHS distribution chain for £ 1 in March 2015, which was later handed over to the administration, leaving a £ 571m hole in its fund. pension.
Meanwhile, boycott promises from Sir Philip's stores, including Topshop, were announced on social media with the #pinknotgreen hashtag, #feministsdontweartopshop also being in light of Lord Hain's statement.
Sir Philip said in a statement Thursday night that he would not comment on anything that happened in court or that was told in Parliament.
"To the extent that it is suggested that I am guilty of illegal badual or racist behavior, I categorically and completely deny these allegations," he said.
Sir Philip said his company, Arcadia, "takes the accusations and grievances of its employees very seriously and, if necessary, a thorough investigation is underway.
"Arcadia employs more than 20,000 people and, like many large companies, sometimes receives formal complaints from its employees.
"In some cases, these are settled with the agreement of all parties and their legal advisers.These regulations are confidential and I can not say any more."
Source link