[ad_1]
Her wedding was a fairy tale story, but Meghan Markle soon learns that happiness only exists for Disney princesses, not for real ones. While she was sneaking into the alley to marry her prince in May, the only entity more seduced than Harry was the general public, who had collapsed into a fainted general feast, seduced by her style , its modernity and style.
But over the seasons, attitudes towards the new princess are too. And although the year may have started with its applause for shaking the establishment, it ends with accusations of resentment. The honeymoon is over, the reaction has started.
In particular, it seems, when it comes to rankings perceived between Meghan and Princess Kate. This weekend, newspapers buzzed with rumors of royal fighting. According to rumors of various anonymous insiders, it is not just the fact that Harry and Meghan are expecting their first child, which has caused them to move from Kensington Palace to Frogmore Cottage, a modest 10-bed house located in the Windsor Park. No, it's the fact that Harry and Meghan do not want to live in Kensington next to William and Kate.
"Kate and Meghan are very different people," a "close friend of the Cambridges" would have said to the Daily Mail. "They do not really hear."
There was even murmuring of trouble in heaven between the royal couple. It was not so long ago, an American publication wrote about insiders claiming that their arguments had become uncontrollable, Meghan "crying over the fact that she felt trapped by the royal rules" and Harry "realizing how much he had been mortified for him to take care of the constant publicity of his family."
It has even recently emerged that the Queen apparently had some great ideas about her grandson's wife, as a result of a choice of pre-nuptial tiaras with her majesty that would have told Harry: "Meghan can not not have what she wants. "
As if raising the Queen's irons was not bad enough, an even more outrageous statement was made: Meghan dared to admire an even more beloved British institution – Marks & Spencer, preferring to buy her tights elsewhere. This followed the indignation caused by the fact that she was not wearing tights at first. There was a second wave of indignation when his Remembrance Day tights were labeled as too bright and inconsistent with his complexion.
Then, there were story stories that tell how the former star of the Suits has badly stuck his helpers. The eyebrows were lifted on the fact that since May, three of the principal collaborators of the Duke and Duchess of Susbad have left their jobs. A royal official said to the Express: "Losing a family member could happen to anyone, losing three in a few months, it's starting to look like a rush."
Nicknamed "Hurricane Meghan", she was accused of getting up early and "bombarding" her collaborators with no fewer than seven texts a day. Recently, a royal badistant (presumably one who feared to receive seven texts) was quoted: "Meghan can be difficult."
Oh, of course, the curse of the woman "difficult". Men come to be determined, determined and ambitious, women to be stubborn and clumsy. All this seems terribly familiar to me. The public finds a woman, falls in love with her, praises her for her looks and puts her on a pedestal because of her personality … only to spend half of the year toppling her from her altar.
As a woman, Meghan's looks have sparked the most virulent criticism. A half of the media seems to have placed it firmly in the camp "too daring", furious against the 37-year-old woman for daring to start wearing panties, ankle or breath. Others have excited him for seeming to calm his fashion choices since entering the royal family.
In July, The Star, Canada's leading online news site, published an article entitled "Why did Meghan Markle's style suddenly become so boring?", Stating that "its clothing independence has virtually gone "and that she" has become prim, proper and boring ".
In the same vein, The Guardian said: "The Windsors have been quick to get rid of Meghan Markle from its brilliance," firmly accusing the feet of the royal family of Meghan's new love of beige. – "the color of a kind of quiet and bbad demon".
Are the British royals really to blame for any perceived change in their new princess? Meghan's mother-in-law would certainly have had some ideas about it, after notoriously renamed "The Cabinet" and be a formidable force for an independent woman.
But it seems more likely that the problem is beyond the doors of Buckingham Palace. The reaction was as exhausting as predictable. We live in a "built-against-directed" society vis-à-vis celebrities, especially with regard to women in the eyes of the public … and especially with regard to princesses.
The young princess Diana was loved for her innocence, but then criticized for her naivety, Fergie was a breath of fresh air but too noisy. Kate was congratulated for allowing William to stay on the ground, while making fun of the social escalation. Eugenie and Beatrice recently spoke to Grazia about the online violence they regularly face for attempting to navigate the role of working young royals. There is an incredibly tight tightrope walk for women to walk when it is to be a royal queen who keeps the reality, becomes a little too real.
It could often be said that it's "every little girl's dream" to become a princess, but most women know that it's a poisoned chalice. And unfortunately, it's unlikely to change anytime soon. The only thing that Meghan can rejoice in is the fact that her subjects tend to be cyclical in their devotions. Mom Meghan will undoubtedly marvel again … until she does not lose the weight of her baby or, worse yet, lose it too fast.
Irish independent
[ad_2]
Source link
