[ad_1]
With Theresa May's third track, Brexit's customs plan is already facing criticism from both inside and outside her government, and two other reports point to the level of disruption this time around. Irish imports, the imminent departure of the EU to the United Kingdom. What is most noticeable in the long awaited white paper of the British government on its future trade relations with the EU, is that London seems to start from nothing close to a year after its publication.
The May Plan, designed to bring together seemingly insurmountable conservative divisions, is a hybrid of the previous solutions of "maximum facilitation" and "customs partnership", which were abolished for practical and political reasons
. It involves the use of sophisticated tracking devices on goods arriving in the UK to determine where they end up and whether UK or EU tariffs apply. But does the technology for such an operation exist?
When the former British chief diplomat, Sir Ivan Rogers, testified before the Home Affairs Committee of the House of Commons, he suggested that technology to clean up hundreds of However, the Brexiters are wary, citing high-tech systems in ports like Felixstowe in Suffolk, which can apparently clean up 360,000-ton ships in 15 minutes using software specialized. The May 'facilitated customs arrangements' – as it is called – rely on tracking systems identifying the final destination of 96 per cent of all goods arriving in the United Kingdom.
But think about it. There are more border crossings on this island than between the EU and all the countries east of it – 275 in total versus 137 land border crossings to the east of l & # 39; EU. Could technology really monitor the commercial movements between our two jurisdictions?
May's proposal has already been described as "impracticable" by his own Brexit Secretary, David Davis, on the grounds that Brussels would not accept a third country, such as the United Kingdom, to monitor its borders and collect fees on its behalf.
Source link
