Rand Paul says he's "concerned," "worried" about Brett Kavanaugh's privacy



[ad_1]

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Again threatens not to support one of President Donald Trump's candidates.

Paul declared himself "undecided" on Sunday on Trump's appointment as US circuit court judge, Brett Kavanaugh. The Supreme Court. Paul, appearing on "Fox News Sunday," is said to be "concerned" by Kavanaugh's position on the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits "unreasonable" searches and seizures by officials

. ] … I am somewhat persuaded to be open minded because it is President Trump who has done such a good job "with Neil Gorsuch's appointment to the High Court. 39, last year, "said Paul. "I'm worried, though, and maybe disappointed that I think Kavanaugh will cancel Gorsuch's vote on the Fourth Amendment."

In 2015, Kavanaugh wrote a concordant opinion to a decision of the District Court of Columbia. Program of collection of phone files without warrant from the National Security Agency. The program allowed the government to track the metadata of the Americans – information about who is calling someone, but not what was said.

The judge wrote that "essential national security needs outweigh the impact on privacy" and refused to "I do not agree at all", said Paul Sunday about Kavanaugh's decision

. Short Circuit

Earlier this year, Paul pledged to do "all it takes" to stop Mike Pompeo's Trump pick to head the state department on the sights the candidate on the war in Iraq. But Paul ended up voting for Pompeo after receiving Trump's "badurances" that the former CIA director now believes the war was a mistake.

With the GOP controlling the Senate by a narrow margin, 51-49, the party can hardly Paul broke with Trump on the appointment of Kavanaugh.

In his comments on Sunday, Paul said that he was anxious to meet Kavanaugh and have a "frank" discussion with him.

Rights, so the fourth amendment is one of them, we are already down one. Let's see what he does for the other nine, "says Paul.

While expressing doubts about the number of lawmakers who can glean Supreme Court candidates in interviews with them, he says : "I think it's worth it I do not think anyone in America believes when you use a cell phone company, or when you use [a credit card] or when you use a bank, that you have given up your right to life private. "

[ad_2]
Source link