"The Brexit Legacy Can not Be a Hard Border in Ireland," May Theresa May Tory Rebels



[ad_1]


  Theresa May "title =" Theresa May "width =" 620 "height =" 429 "rel =" nofollow
Theresa May

  Independent.ie Newsdesk

  • "Inheritance Brexit can not be hard Theresa May tells Tory rebels

    Independent.ie

    Theresa May warned conservative rebels seeking to destroy her plan to give the EU the right to receive no "Brexit" unless they fall off line.

    https://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/britain/the-legacy-of-brexit-cannot-be-a-hard-border-in-ireland-theresa-may-tells-tory -rebels-37119825.html

    https://www.independent.ie/business/article37040218.ece/b6790/AUTOCROP/h342/2018-06-23_bus_41967389_I1.JPG

  • Email

Theresa May warned Conservative rebels who sought to destroy his plan to let the EU have the right to receive no "Brexit" unless they fall into line.

The British Prime Minister has declared that the threat of Communist uprisings by pro- and anti-EU MPs could jeopardize any possibility of concluding an agreement with Brussels

. Ms May acknowledged that some MEPs were concerned about her plan for a "common settlement" with the EU for goods and goods traded in what she called a new "". However, she insisted that she had not yet seen a "viable alternative" to the proposals – approved by the Cabinet in Checkers – that would ensure that trade remains as "friction free" as possible. avoiding the return of a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic

"We must keep our eyes on the price, otherwise we risk no longer having Brexit", she declared

. "I know that there are some who have concerns about the" Common Rule Book "for goods and the arrangements we have proposed will support the new UK-EU Free Trade Area.

"But the Brexit legacy can not be a border between Northern Ireland and Ireland that disarms the historic Belfast agreement."

" It can not be the break in our precious United Kingdom. the sea of ​​Ireland. And it can not be the destruction of integrated supply chains and just-in-time processes on which jobs and livelihoods depend.

His warning came when the trade bill came back to Commons on Tuesday with competing amendments.

She said that a series of "demolition" changes supported by members of the European-based Tory Brexit research group would jeopardize the government's plans for a "non-transaction scenario". to a prejudicial and disorderly Brexit, because without the pbadage of this bill, we would not be able to retain the benefits of more than 40 existing trade agreements; nor will it afford the means to protect consumers, industries and workers from goods unjustly traded in a post-Brexit Britain ", she said.

which would keep Britain in a customs union with the EU after Brexit

"This would be the ultimate betrayal of the Brexit vote. This would eliminate our ability to have an independent trade policy, conceding Britain's role on the world stage as a free-trade force and endangering jobs and people's livelihoods. In practice, the Brexiters are unlikely to succeed because the Labor Party will not support them while it is not clear whether the pro-EU faction, which has largely supported Checkers' plan, [] 19659005] Ms. May's intervention comes as former Brexit Minister Steve Baker, who resigned with Boris Johnson and David Davis from the Checkers Plan, said that this proposal was the work of the company. an "elite of the establishment" who sought to thwart the "It seems to me that there was a year of cloak and dagger to put us in the position of the Ladies", he told the Sunday Telegraph

"An elite establishment that has never accepted the basic right of the public to democratically choose its institutions is working to overthrow them."

"We get back to what officials wanted a year ago, the advice they gave then, of something like the EEA (European Economics ic "With regard to those who, ultimately, hold the pen on the documents that will be submitted to the Cabinet for collective decision, it is the Europe Unit of the Cabinet Office, and they have clearly operated "

M. Davis, meanwhile, described claims that there was no alternative to Checkers' plan as "surprisingly dishonest.

In The Sunday Times, he said that the Cabinet had He added: "None of this comes down to taking back control … some say those on the other side of the The argument made concessions to the EU that were so fundamental that they could jeopardize the entire Brexit process. "

not elaborated an alternative. This is a surprisingly dishonest claim. "

Association of the press

[ad_2]
Source link