[ad_1]
When Theresa May returned to her retirement country at Checkers on Friday, her plan for Brexit was attacked in the House of Commons, in the right-wing press, conservative activists around Britain and her guest, Donald Trump . A week ago, the Prime Minister triumphed Checkers after a one-day cabinet meeting that left his ministers Brexite apparently defeated, with Boris Johnson proposing a toast to her dinner. The cabinet had approved the May proposal for a mild Brexit that would keep the UK closely aligned with the EU, following European regulations on goods and agribusiness.
Backbench Brexiteers had grumbled when excerpts from the plan seemed to admit that he would make a trade deal with the United States more difficult. But last weekend, Brexit ministers Michael Gove, Andrea Leadsom and Chris Grayling visited broadcast studios to defend Checkers' plan as a pragmatic, principled path for the 2016 referendum vote. 19659003] in this regard, wrote a reader of Telegraph. "Cabinet is largely composed of non-reconstructed conciliators"
The resignation of David Davis late Sunday night was a shock but not a surprise, as the former Secretary of State at the exit of the European Union had long been unhappy because it was frozen from negotiations with Brussels and his best adviser Brexit, Olly Robbins
But Johnson's decision to do the same was a bomb, all the more inflammatory by a resignation letter that accused the Prime Minister of leaving to die the dream of Brexit. "Brexit should be about the opportunity and the hope.This should be a chance to do things differently, to be more agile and dynamic, and to maximize the particular advantages of the UK as a whole. that the world economy is open and outward-looking, and said that the Prime Minister's plan would force the United Kingdom to follow in perpetuity the very directives of the European Union against which the Eurosceptics they have been high for years, without any influence on their content. "In this respect, we are really moving towards colony status – and many will find it difficult to see the economic or political benefits of this particular arrangement. What is even more disturbing is that it is our offer of openness. That's already so we see the end state of the UK – before the other party makes its counter-offer. It's like we're sending our vanguard to battle with the white flags floating above them. "
Johnson, who brought a professional photographer to capture a picture of him signing the letter, reflected a widely shared sentiment of betrayal between Brexite on the back benches of the Conservatives and party members." For several days this week, the page of letters of the Daily Telegraph was entirely composed of letters on the plan of Checkers, almost all hostile and many accusing the Prime Minister of treason
now with the strong stench of Munich on this subject. The Cabinet is largely composed of non-reconstructed conciliators, but unfortunately there is no Churchill to get us out of this unpleasant swamp, "wrote Richard Skilbeck of Berkshire
. Many other correspondents were inspired by Munich and the appeasement of Hitler, but that was not enough for Chris Rome of Thruxton. in Hampshire
"We have no more chamberlain as chief but rather, I fear, a petain.The Conservative Party will not forgive the knife in the back of the British people brandished by Ms. May, but forged by his "advisers," he wrote
while some backbench Brexiters made comments about throwing May overboard – an attempt was doomed to failure. % of conservative MPs – which means 48 in the current parliament – to trigger a vote of confidence in the party leader, but more than 50% – or at least 159 – to win it, and Downing Street said Monday This month- it would fight any challenge to its leadership.If she got such a vote, she could not be challenged until 12 months, by which time the UK should already leave the EU
The European Research Group, a publicly funded organization of Brexite MPs, led by Jacob Rees-Mogg (officially providing research services to deputies in Westminster), opted for a guerrilla campaign aimed at to force the Prime Minister to abandon his plan. It began with a series of staggered resignations of junior ministers and senior party officials, including Conservative Vice Presidents Ben Bradley and Maria Caulfield
. Little Westminster or inside heard of Bradley or Caulfield, but the importance of their move lies in the fact that neither one nor the other is considered to be at the end of the Brexit debate. Bradley is a former Remain supporter who represents a seat that has voted Leave, and Caulfield is a former leave supporter representing a seat from Rest.
In their resignation letters, they both cited last December 's commitment to accept a safety net. a key factor to push it towards a sweet Brexit. "For me, the guarantee agreement for Northern Ireland was neither necessary nor constructive for the future prosperity of the United Kingdom." Having close ties with the Republic of Ireland, I think the support position is not appropriate and should have been rejected.It was used by the EU as a way to block a mutually beneficial agreement, "Caulfield wrote.
Brexiteers and their DUP allies have long complained that the border issue has been deliberately exaggerated by Ireland and the EU as a way to push the UK into a closer alignment with the European Union after Brexit. Under the EU's proposal for support, Northern Ireland would remain in the customs union and in parts of the single market, a scenario that would require controls on goods moving between the EU and the EU. Northern Ireland and Great Britain. clarified that, if there is no agreement on the backstop, there will be no withdrawal agreement and, above all, no transitional period
May rejected this proposal as creating unacceptable barriers between parts of the UK, suggesting instead that the safety net should apply across the UK. Brussels rejects this as offering Great Britain a back door in the single market that would allow the UK to enjoy many benefits without obligations such as the free movement of people.
The problem for the Brexite is that Brussels clearly has no agreement on the backstop, there will be no withdrawal agreement and especially, no transition period. The transitional agreement, according to which access to customs and the single market would remain unchanged until December 2020, is essential for British companies
Otherwise, Britain would pull out of the EU in March 2019 with potentially catastrophic economic consequences. that the government no longer has the time to put in place adequate emergency plans.
Faced with this reality, Brexit ministers, like Michael Gove, concluded that it was better to leave the EU in March 2019 on terms they consider flawed. work to improve them later. Daniel Hannan, a conservative MEP who shares this view, compared it this week to the pro-treaty party's approach in the early years of Irish independence
"When the Irish Free State left the UK, in 1921, all sorts of conditions regarding treaty ports and oaths of supremacy and residual tax payments.And that quickly became apparent, this did not happen. It was not just that these things were inapplicable once the split was made, it's that everyone in Britain lost interest in enforcing them, "he said. There were some difficulties en route in the 1920s, it was better to have grasped what looked like imperfect independence and to have built rather than risking the whole process. "
Uncompromising Brexiters will lead their guerrilla campaign in the House of Commons next week, when MPs debate a trade bill. Rees-Mogg and his allies have tabled a series of amendments aimed at eliminating a key element of the May plan, a proposal for a "facilitated customs arrangement" that would see Britain collecting tariffs on behalf of the United States. ; EU.
little chance of success, but they will allow a Brexite show of force aimed at troubling the Prime Minister. It seems however that May remains determined to follow her plan while awaiting an official response from Brussels
. The initial response from the EU has been mild but without commitment, and much of the plan may be unacceptable in Brussels, where it is being seen. as an attempt to choose the single market. Although the European Commission considers the European Union's desire to protect the integrity of the single market as being led by the European Commission, several Member States are worried about the economic consequences of the bid. of a competitive advantage after Brexit.
In Brussels, Britain hopes that the EU will consider the May plan as the basis for a discussion on their relations after Brexit, to negotiate with the outstanding issues in the US. withdrawal agreement. Downing Street said that this week's white paper has not changed Britain's position on the backstop, which still insists on the UK.
Behind the scenes, however, there are rumors of a possible compromise – suggested last week by Michel Barnier when he said that only a limited number of European laws would continue to apply to him. Northern Ireland and that the sea would be strictly "technical and operational"
Conservative MPs, including the Brexitists, privately recognize that Northern Ireland has been treated differently from the rest of the UK and continues to have a separate regime for animal health that requires controls. Some Brexiters hope that unlocking the safety net, even if it opposes the DUP, could pave the way for a harder Brexit based on a free trade agreement like the one that the European Union with Canada. This may require that Brexiters votes on the labor market be rejected by the DUP.
May's allies also look at the Labor seats, in the hope that pro-EU Labor MPs could vote for a Brexit plan allowing him to get a majority without the support of the tough Brexiters on his own benches.
But there may not be a majority in Westminster for any of the currently proposed Brexit forms, and hard-line Brexiters are confident that if MPs reject an agreement that May returns from Brussels, the Britain will automatically leave the EU. A Brexit without agreement is only supported by one in ten people in the Commons, and the majority is likely to find a way to make sure that does not happen.
This could mean delaying Brexit by asking for an extension of time. Article 50 bargaining period of two years, a delay that could last for years or lead to a second referendum that could stop Brexit altogether. If this happens, the authors of Telegraph's letter will have to find a brand new lexicon of treason and betrayal.
Read Fintan O 'Toole to find out why there is nothing undemocratic about voting on Brexit.
Source link
