[ad_1]
The corporate watchdog believes that the main data breach at Independent News & Media (INM) ) went beyond a search involving a highly publicized list of 19 people.
Earlier this year, it was revealed that the Corporate Enforcement Director's Office (ODCE) has uncovered a document suggesting that 19 names, including those from Brendan O Connor and Sam Smyth, were used during the search of backup tapes by an external company.
But the High Court was informed yesterday that there were other "reports" of the so-called "interrogation" data
The ODCE n & # 39; 39; had not been able to open them even with the help of computer experts, as they are protected by pbadword.
"There have clearly been other badyzes that we have not been able to access," said Brian Murray, an ODCE lawyer
.
He wants the inspectors range of corporate governance issues, including the data senior executives of the INM were forced to pay for Newstalk, a radio station owned by the largest MNI shareholder, businessman Denis O. Brien, under pressure from the president of the time, Leslie Buckley
. attempting to convey the benefit "to Mr. O. Brien and could only take place if there was" fundamental discomfort "at the MNI. He also suggested that there was a culture of deference towards Mr. O. Brien and his representative on the INM Board of Directors, Mr. Buckley
MNI s 39 opposes the application on the ground that it is unjustified and that it will be detrimental to the business
Buckley's successor as chairman, Murdoch MacLennan, and independent director Len O & # Hagan were in court for the hearing, which is expected to last three days
Mr. Murray explained how the INM data tapes were given to an outside company, TDS UK, on the 39, authorization of Mr. Buckley in October 2014.
He stated that Mr. Buckley claimed that this was done as part of a "cost reduction exercise", where he was looking for tails on a contract with attorney Simon McAleese.
But Mr. Murray said, "We now know that the data was searched for people who have no obvious connection to Mr. McAleese's contract."
The lawyer told the court that a "report" of a search, discovered in an email discovered by ODCE, detailed the names of 19 p person among those- These included four journalists, two lawyers, former staff members and MNI directors, and staff from the FTI Consulting strategic communications company. There was also an employee of the cable and wireless telecommunications company, which Mr. Murray said was a competitor of Digicel, a company founded by Mr. O. Brien
M. Murray described how, in a letter to Mr. Buckley, the MNI lawyers listed on the list as persons who could in one way or another have acted adversely against Mr. O & M # 39; Brien. He also said that the invoices for the interrogation of the data had been paid by Blaydon, a company owned by Mr. O. Brien.
The lawyer stated that although ODCE wanted the inspectors to review a series of questions, the data breach was justified.
He said that there were three common factors in all areas of concern.
This was Mr. Buckley, Mr. O. Brien and an action or proposal to confer a benefit on Mr. O. Brien at the post d & # 39; inspector.
million. Murray stated that the position of the MNI was that if the alleged issues were true, it was "intentionally misled" by Mr. Buckley. But he said that the fact that the INM's board of directors was "deceived" raised the possibility that he was deceived by other means.
The lawyer said that if any or all of these events occurred, "
When the board took cognizance of the data issue, he asked Mr. Buckley his account and he was" very willing "to accept it in preference to an account given by the old MNI. Robert Pitt, General Manager, declared
M. Murray said the board of directors has set up a committee to investigate the concerns expressed by Mr. Pitt about the Newstalk draft agreement. Mr. Buckley was born again, said Mr. Murray.
Irish Independent
[ad_2]
Source link
