[ad_1]
It is fair to say that the British royal family is fighting a war (not the rose) with the tabloids right now, 22 years after the paparazzi expressed their remorse for the death of Princess Diana. With a new generation of tabloid photographers, many of them have no idea of the dangers they pose. At the same time, they do not seem to care if they invent royal scandals if there is not even the slightest evidence available.
Their biggest media story recently was the quarrel between Meghan and Kate, something we've seen defying continuously. After being mostly wrong, the tabloids seemed to have moved on to the next big story: Kate banishing Rose Hanbury from her life.
Prince William and Kate Middleton are ideal targets for false news
While America continually struggles with the idea of what is true and what is not mentioned in the media when it comes to politics, the British stories of royal and filigree quarrels seem to be a game of politics. child in comparison. A well-disposed public, here and here, is always ready to engulf Kate and Meghan's prospects of not hearing.
As soon as the news was revealed that Kate was avoiding Rose Hanbury to get close to her surroundings, hell broke loose over the possibility that it was due to a connection between William and Rose.
Many aspects of this story have been overlooked, although there still seems to be some leeway to keep up the trend. All this is part of the secret formula used by the tabloids for years, including rags in America that we still see in the aisles of the crates.
Fortunately, sources like The Daily Mail call the William case an irreproachable fabrication.
The scandal of Rose Hanbury probably comes from tabloids who do not get along with the young royal family
Remember that William and Kate were not very friendly with the international press. Some of you may remember when they sued a French tabloid that posted photos of Kate's naked breasts. Some might think it was William's revenge against France for failing to properly treat his mother after his tragic car accident.
Most of the time, it's a chord for all tabloids and royal hatred for what they do to try to ruin personally. The British paparazzi have obviously paid attention and dig even more to inflate salacious stories when the reality is very likely very different.
What is interesting in this new story about William's alleged affair with Rose Hanbury is that The Daily Mail provides ample evidence of the falsification of this story. They even say that William and David Cholmondeley (Hanbury's husband) are puzzled by these rumors and often joke about them like typical paparazzi fluff.
Will there be a new trial?
The youngest members of the royal family have not yet sued the British press for a false story. Nevertheless, there is a precedent for that. The Queen sued the Sun several years back for disclosing copyright protected information in advance.
Princess Diana also sued for invasion of privacy and received compensation for legal fees, as well as a donation to one of her charities.
Unfortunately, there has been no law in Britain before these last years where one can successfully pursue a tabloid for lack of privacy. Now you can, leaving it to the royal family to sue the tabloids viciously if she thinks her privacy has ever been violated.
While this story of William and Rose Hanbury continues to permeate it, we wonder if William and Kate will sue the British tabloids to break the story.
Harry and Meghan can sue
Since news papers are much more hungry for news about Harry, Meghan and their baby royal, this could foster a bigger war between the young royal family and the British press in the years to come.
We all know the war of roses in Britain's past. In terms of the 21st century, this could be the war of privacy, as newly-developed royals attempt to shut down a British press without any ethical sense or understanding of the tragic consequences they might create again.
[ad_2]
Source link