[ad_1]
Mankind is probably alone in the universe, concludes a new study from the University of Oxford.
In an article submitted to the Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, the researchers write that there is "a substantial likelihood that there is no other intelligent life in our observable universe. "
The researchers of the future of humanity at the Oxford University Institute titled his article" Dissolving the Fermi Paradox, "the question posed in the 1950s that asked why we had not seen the evidence of extraterrestrial life yet.
Scroll Down for Video
Oxford University researchers titled their article Dissolving the Fermi Paradox, the question asked in 195 We asked why we have not seen evidence of extraterrestrial life yet.
The new study uses a probability distribution to capture the most likely scenarios, rather than badigning a single value.
is alone among the intelligent civilizations in our galaxy is 53% -99.6%, and through the observable universe is 39% -85%.
"We should not be really surprised to see an empty galaxy," the authors, Anders Sandberg, Eric Drexler, Toby Ord, wrote.
The Drake equation examines the different relevant variables life forms, including factors like formed stars and their planets and the average number of planets that can potentially support life.
They claim that thought is based on an equation known as Drake's equation. to the different variables that would be relevant to intelligent life forms, including factors like formed stars and their planets and the average number of planets that can potentially support life.
"The expectation that the universe is filled with intelligent life is linked to models like the Drake equation, which suggest that even though the probability of intelligent life on a given site is low however, the multitude of possible sites should yield a large number of potentially observable civilizations.
"We show that this conflict stems from the use of Drake-like equations, which implicitly badume certainties about parameters. Highly Uncertain
The team says their work "makes a marked difference."
WHAT IS THE PARADOXE FERMI?
The Fermi Paradox wonders why, considering estimates of 200 to 400 billion stars and at least 100 billion planets in our galaxy, no sign of extraterrestrial life.
The contradiction is named d. after its creator, the physicist ita link Enrico Fermi.
He posed the question for the first time in 1950.
Fermi believed that it was too extraordinary that only one signal extraterrestrial or engineering project has not yet been detected in the universe – despite its immense immensity.
Fermi concluded that there must be a barrier that limits the rise to power of intelligent, self-aware, technologically advanced spatiotemporal civilizations.
This barrier is sometimes called the Great Filter & # 39;
The Italian physicist Enrico Fermi conceived the so-called Fermi paradox in the 1950s. He explores why there is no sign of extraterrestrial life, despite the 100 billion planets in our galaxy
If the main obstacle preventing the colonization of other planets is not in our past, so the barrier to reach other worlds must lie in our future, scientists have theorized.
Professor Brian Cox believes that the scientific and technological advances required by a civilization to begin to conquer the stars ultimately lead to its destruction.
He said: One solution to the Fermi paradox is that it is not possible to rule a world that has the power to destroy itself and that needs Global collaboration solutions to prevent it.
"
Other possible explanations for the Fermi paradox are that no other intelligent species has appeared in the universe, intelligent alien species are present – but lacking resources needed. technology to communicate with the Earth
Some believe that the distances between intelligent civilizations are too great to allow any type of two-way communication.
If two worlds are separated by many thousands of light-years away, it is possible that one or both of the two civilizations will be extinct before a dialogue can be established.
The so-called Zoo hypothesis states that intelligent extraterrestrial life exists, but deliberately avoids contact with life on Earth to allow its natural evolution.
When the model is re-cast to represent realistic distributions of uncertainty, we find a substantial probability { em ex ante} that there is no difference. other intelligent life in our observable universe, and so that there is little surprise when we fail to detect any signs.
The team says their work "does a difference "on existing theories about life elsewhere in the universe
" This result dissolves the Fermi paradox and, in doing so, eliminates any need to invoke speculative mechanisms by which civilizations would inevitably fail to have observable effects on the universe. "
However, researchers told Universe Today that they" We do not show that extraterrestrial life is found, and researchers such as SETI are useless . "
"What we do not show, is that SETI is useless, quite the contrary," said Dr. Sanberg.
"There is a huge level of uncertainty to reduce.
" The article shows that astrobiology and SETI can play a big role in reducing Uncertainty on some of the parameters.
One important conclusion we find is that the lack of intelligence observed does not allow us to conclude that intelligence does not last long: the stars do not predict our destiny! "
[ad_2]
Source link
