[ad_1]
Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday of possible implications for Israel in the international arena if the nation-state bill is pbaded in its present form.
Sources confirmed to Haaretz that "the subject actually appeared" in a conversation between Mendelblit and Netanyahu, but "there was no special meeting on" the legislation.
Deputy Attorney General Ran Nizri also said Tuesday at a meeting in the Knesset that the adoption of the bill would have international ramifications, adding, "I stop here. Let's put on another hat, we are doing our work in closed rooms where we are talking to the relevant politicians, and here we are talking more about the international implications. "
>> Explained: The controversial bill that would allow exclusively Jewish communities in Israel
Legislation, which would have a status similar to the Constitution, would give priority to Jewish values rather than to democratic values. A controversial clause would allow the establishment of communities separated by religion or nationality. The law would also define Hebrew as the only official language in Israel and instruct judges to seek precedents from Jewish judicial decisions when Israeli law provides no direction.
In addition to damage to Israel's democratic image, the implications could involve agreements and treaties to which Israel is a signatory, as well as international law.
Meanwhile, the Likud is studying the possibility of amending the wording of one of the controversial clauses of the bill, Article 7b, which allows the establishment of exclusively Jewish communities. The alternative wording is primarily declarative and does not prohibit members of other ethnic groups from settling in Jewish communities.
According to the alternative, the cause would read as follows: "The State of Israel considers itself determined to the resolution of the League of Nations, which has supported the strong Jewish settlement in the areas under his control ". Haggai Vinitzky of the Menachem Begin Heritage Center, who presented it at a meeting in the Knesset on Tuesday. The wording of Vinitzky is based on the document establishing the British Mandate in Palestine. Article 6 of this document states that the British government would encourage a dense Jewish settlement and facilitate the immigration of Jews to the areas of Palestine.
The wording should prevent international criticism of the law.
"It was clear to everyone that the wording of the original clause was very problematic," said a senior Likud official in Haaretz. "Vinitzky's proposal solves a lot of problems, but it also makes the issue of statement-making rather than operational."
The major uncertainty, said the official, was "to continue to advance the law, which would be devoid of significant tools to" Judaize "Galilee and the Negev, and he There was an important aspect in the very principle of legislating on a nation-state law in Israel – Netanyahu is the one who has to decide. "
During the meeting, it became apparent that the current wording of the clause could open the door to the intervention of the High Court of Justice and demand equal construction for members of other religions and ethnic groups. Given this possibility, the right-wing parties decided to soften the language.
The Yisrael Beiteinu party also suggested two alternative formulations on Tuesday for the controversial clause. MK Oded Forer submitted the party's objections to the bill and suggested a similar formulation to Vinitzky: "The State of Israel considers itself obliged to establish and reinforce the strong Jewish settlement in the areas of the Land of Israel under his control. "
Another alternative suggested by Forer was: "The State of Israel will be open and will encourage the immigration of Jews and the gathering of exiles and will work to develop Jewish settlement in Earth. ;Israel."
The Knesset's legal adviser stated that Forer's suggestions were better than those of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, which works on legislation, and that these suggestions should be developed "to avoid damage. This fits well with the Zionist ethos. "
In criticizing the current wording, Forer told the committee: "What will happen in the city of Arad, when enough Gerer Hasidim will move in and claim that" the Jews who are not Jewish according to what the Rabbi Gerer decided will not be able to live in the city ""?
Another controversial clause, 7a, would allow everyone to maintain their culture, education, heritage, language and identity. The committee's legal counsel, Gur Bligh, stated that he could not exclude the possibility that the clause would be discriminatory against women, given the room for maneuver that would allow everyone to maintain his or her rights. own values.
[ad_2]
Source link
