[ad_1]
Laura Grego, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, who works on space security, says that the idea of a space force means different things to different people: a bureaucratic reorganization inducing headaches for some; protection of federal and commercial badets to others; and the militarization of space for others yet.
Congress has asked the Pentagon to conduct a study on the issue, which is expected to be completed next month. "It seems premature to have a solution before you have seen the study you have requested," she said.
Preparations for the Pentagon
The Pentagon responds to Trump's directive. "Our political council will begin to work on this issue, which has implications for intelligence operations of the air force, the army, the navies and the navy," the spokesman said. Lieutenant-Colonel Jamie Davis, spokesperson for the Ministry of Defense. "Working with Congress will be a deliberate process with a lot of input from multiple stakeholders."
Bridenstine said that the creation of a space force would not interfere with the programs or funding of his agency.
Modernizing the way the federal government regulates the commercial use of space has attracted normally distant agencies in a single conversation. NASA, the ministries of trade, defense, transport and other agencies are reorienting their space activities, in line with the three White House directives issued since December.
A June Deloitte badysis revealed that spatial regulation is densely networked and can not be changed without considering many others, too. "As a general rule, the government must consider at least seven other regulations in terms of space, but it gets more complicated, since each of these seven regulations has its own quotes, which also have their own quotes , etc. ", Deloitte's authors
While private companies pursue with confidence many space-related businesses and travel companies, NASA has looked to the moon, March and beyond. Trump "wants our return to the moon to be sustainable," says Bridenstine. "We will not leave the moon as we did in 1972", date of the last landing of the United States.
Bridenstine also looks beyond the International Space Station (ISS), which the United States is considering private sector in the next decade, to the construction of permanent infrastructure above and around the moon .
Kirk and Picard
A permanent infrastructure for the moon can not be achieved without international partners, says Bridenstine. US-Russian collaboration of two decades on the ISS. This partnership has gone through tumultuous periods in relations between the two countries, including the tense period of sanctions that began after the annexation of Crimea by Moscow.
"China is a bit of a different story," says Bridenstine. "It's possible that maybe someday they might be involved, but I do not think people are comfortable with that" because of issues that include intellectual property litigation and human rights. 39; man. Since 2011, Congress has banned NASA employees from collaborating with Chinese counterparts.
As with any future space force, Bridenstine argues that his staff should have ranks similar to those of the Navy, such as Captains Kirk and Picard of Star Trek. "If you look at sci-fi movies, all the space military, they're all admirals, which is, of course, a navy rank."
Bloomberg
[ad_2]
Source link
