Do Trump's rates weigh on him in the Midwest?



[ad_1]

Receive last minute alerts and special reports.

WASHINGTON – It is unclear whether the low popularity of President Donald Trump in a trio of NBC / Marist polls of Midwestern states is due to fallout after Helsinki (polls were conducted on most of the time after his presser with Putin), or the backlash at his rates in these states, or just that they are harder polls than usual for the president.

But as Bloomberg's Josh Green observes it's probably not a coincidence that the three states where Trump's rating is less than 40% in our polls – Michigan (steel, auto) , Minnesota (corn, soy) and Wisconsin (Harley Davidson) – are states with companies and products Paulette Ditter feeds cows at her farm in Plymouth, Wisconsin, on June 2nd. With dairy prices low, many dairy farmers are worried that they will be even more affected by tariffs.

<img src = "https://media1.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2018_30/2510061/180726-ditter-wisconsin-farm-mn-0920_298ed78cbd828cd0c2f7d6d8594982b3.fit-760w.jpg" alt = "l & Trump administration 'Alyssa Schukar / for NBC News

Today, Trump travels to two other Midwestern states, Iowa and Illinois, where he will participate in a roundtable on the development of the workforce and will comment on the trade.The good news for Trump today is that he has something to say about the trade (l & # 39; 39, $ 12 billion help, plus the EU's concession to buy soy.) The question, however, is whether something is enough.

Here are the results NBC / Marists for Trump and the GOP in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin:

Trump's job rating (among registered voters)

(among registered voters)

Trump deserves it to be re-elected? 19659011] The other issues of the NBC / Marist polls – including primary and general horse races in these states – are published later today. in the trade war? Or just a lull in the conflict?

Perhaps considering these numbers, Trump has been trying to reduce trade tensions with the European Union. The New York Times on yesterday's joint statements by Trump and Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission: "Both parties, he said, had agreed to suspend tariffs and charges. abandon existing steel and aluminum rights, while attempting to reach an agreement to eliminate tariffs, non-tariff barriers and subsidies on industrial products, with the exception of "

More:" Hard to say was a real truce or just a lull in a conflict that could flare up again. "Twice, Trump's aides negotiated potential deals with China, only to He dismisses them and imposes other tariffs.The removal of these trade barriers to zero would be an extraordinarily complex political challenge on both sides of the Atlantic. "

And:" And Mr. Trump abandoned the punitive tariff threats for c Some relatively minor European concessions: buying soybeans to make the United States build more export terminals, which are far away.

The White House (Update: Finally) has corrected its official transcript on behalf of China. Helsinki Presser

Yesterday we were a bit quick to judge the omission of the White House in its official Vladimir Putin transcript stating that he wanted Trump to win in 2016. The White House issued a statement after our publication saying that the omission was not

"The White House stenographer uses the audio of the White House audio to produce The audio mixer on the site did not raise the issue of the microphone level in time to catch the beginning of Jeff's question because the translator was still speaking. said the White House to Peter Alexander of NBC

. The White House has not deliberately modified or deleted its transcript. Pretty good.

But understand this: A whole day after it became a story, the White House has NOT UPDATED its transcript yet. Until the day after the original publication of First Read on Thursday morning, he showed this:

REUTERS & # 39; JEFF MASON: And did you ask one of your government officials? To help do that?

PUTIN: (As interpreted.) Yes, I did. Yes I did it. Because he talked about bringing American-Russian relations back to normal.

Instead:

JEFF MASON OF REUTERS: Did you want President Trump to win the elections, and did you direct your officials to help them do that?

PUTIN (interpreted): Yes, I did it. Yes I did it. He talked about bringing the Russian relationship back to normal.

The White House finally corrected the transcript to include the question later on Thursday.

And why did it matter? Just this week, Trump claimed via Twitter that Russia will "push hard for the Democrats" in November. "I am very concerned that Russia will fight very hard to have an impact on the next election.Based on the fact that no president has been harder towards Russia than me, they are going to push very hard for Democrats, they certainly do not want Trump! ", he said.

Bill Shine has already made an impression at the White House Trump

You can already see the impact of Bill Shine, the former director of Fox News, is having at Home white. Yesterday was the announcement of Trump-EU in the Rose Garden, which had just interrupted the roar that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was receiving on Capitol Hill. So, someone becomes a screenwriter and can put another story on TV.

Then came the news that the White House had banned a CNN reporter from attending this Rose Garden event. "The White House banned a CNN reporter from attending a press event with President Donald Trump on Wednesday after she asked him questions about his former lawyer Michael Cohen and Russian President Vladimir Putin. ", according to NBC News. The White House reporter, Kaitlan Collins, was the White House journalist during a photo shoot with President Trump and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, which means that "I'm going to be here." she was asking questions on behalf of several news agencies. As the President was sitting for photos, Collins threw a few questions in the hope that Trump could answer. "

Our esteemed colleague Dan Balz did say :" [T] the White House fought back against CNN @ Kaitlancollins for doing his job which was to ask questions to the president about news of the day. WH's action was totally unjustified and outrageous.

Stacey Abrams versus Brian Kemp in Georgia could be the most ideologically polarized race

NBC's Alex Seitz-Wald: "She is a strong supporter of arms control; He is a member of the gun-loving NRA who posed with a small arsenal in his campaign ads. She denounces the "heartless" treatment of immigrants; he says that he has a big truck just in case I should gather illegal criminals.

"She is a progressive democrat who would be the first female black governor of the nation; it is a white man "politically incorrect conservative" with the support of President Donald Trump. This year's Georgia governor's race presents striking contrasts between candidates, with each party's hopes offering a clearer distillation of their base's pbadions than you will find in almost every other race in the nation this year. . "

" I call it the Battle of the Bases, "said Kerwin Swint, a political scientist and dean of Kennesaw State University, just outside of Kennesaw. ; Atlanta. "It's perhaps there that our policy is heading: this race is going to be ideological in a way that Georgia is not really used to." And it's going to be nationalized from a way that Georgia is not really used to. ""

So, this could end up being a cover of Trump vs. Clinton – or maybe even a glimpse of Trump vs. Warren.] [ad_2]
Source link