[ad_1]
The day will come when Israel's Holocaust credit line with the world will deplete. The day will come when the leaders of Judeo-Israeli colonialism will be judged. The day will come and those who today are showing an ever weaker tolerance towards us because of Auschwitz on the one hand, our industry war and the intelligence of the Another, and because of our relative whiteness over another, will be fed up.
To truly understand Israel and the Middle East – subscribe to Haaretz
This is not a prophecy, but a politico-sociological evaluation. We simply can not know if this will happen after a horrible bloodshed here or a moment before. The sooner this day comes, the better for all of us.
Even before Europe was ruled by Hitler and his ilk, who was not content with old-fashioned anti-Semitism, Zionism developed as a movement of multiple personalities:
1. A movement in search of an outlet for anti-Jewish racism in Europe and for cynical politics uses populist regimes and movements made of xenophobia;
2. Part of the operative and ideological machinery of colonialism, which engaged Europe socially and economically, sought to develop in the interests of colonization and regarded native people in other countries as baggage. excessive and disposable.
3. A bulldozer that sets the stage for a uni-national state, following the pattern of Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe after the First World War.
The old anti-Semitism pushed the Jews to change their conditions. Even though they knew the phrase "next year in Jerusalem," most of them did not choose the Zionist path of immigration to Palestine but the many solutions of the diaspora: immigration to other states (before limitations are imposed), badimilation, Orthodoxy, socialism, communism, liberalism, cultural autonomy (Bund). When Europe threw Jews not only from within their borders but from their very existence, and when other countries closed their doors to them, the attraction of Zionism s & # 39; He is raised among the Jews.
The subjective condition of Jewish immigrants in Palestine on the eve of and in the wake of the Holocaust (including Jews from Muslim countries) was that of traumatized refugees. In objective terms, they mobilized and volunteered to expel the Palestinian people, a nation that has been developing in this country for hundreds of years, to make a place and a political order that does not take into account only Jews. .
The shame of Europe (sincere or pragmatic) on the Third Reich era, with the second characteristic of Zionism noted above, brought Israel (into its pre-1967 boundaries ) in the lap of nations and the consensus of international law. The shadow of the Third Reich's atrocities temporarily overshadowed the disaster that the foundation of Israel brought to the Palestinians. But the further one gets away from Kristallnacht, Wannsee and the revolts of Treblinka and Sobibor, the more the shadow contracts. Yet we have chosen to continue to expel, dispossess and trample on, to bring the world's leaders to Yad Vashem and to enlist our own for the expulsion of the Palestinians.
Israel had occasions to express its remorse and renounce its colonial-colonial personality, and it failed them. For example, the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993 was such an opportunity, provided by the Palestinians, and Israel consciously rejected it. Israel chose to declare itself to itself and to the world: Yes, I was, am and I will be a colonial colonial entity. And those who undermine my sacred right to continue to expel and trample are anti-Semitic.
Indeed, this deterrence of bullying works – but not all the time and not everyone. The towns and villages of Italy and Spain condemn Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip. The Irish Senate has approved a boycott of products from settlements. The declaration of the Council of the Socialist International at the end of last month provided another example: it called for the recognition of a Palestinian state along the borders of 4 June 1967. It called for the Stop all the constructions in the settlements, including Jerusalem. He called on the countries to boycott, give in and / or punish "the Israeli occupation, the institutions of the illegal Israeli occupation and the settlements". In other words, not a boycott against Israel because it is Israel, but because it pursues a colonial enterprise in the territories that it conquered in 1967. In the same spirit , the Council called for solidarity with progressive forces in Israel and Palestinian citizens of Israel, and condemns the institutionalized discrimination against them.
It is true that the International now includes authoritarian parties that have driven out several old European social democratic parties. That's right, he became corrupted and ossified. (The resignation of the Israeli Labor Party from the International last week on the BDS resolution, however, has added to the credit of the International.) It does not have the power and charisma that it has. he had when Willy Brandt was president. But its representatives reflect the political positions of 140 parties and political movements in the world and the state of mind of millions of their members.
The World Council of Churches, which includes churches of many Christian denominations in some 110 countries, condemned Israel's plan to demolish the Bedouin village of Khan al-Ahmar. The authors of the resolution know very well that this village is not the only one that Israel intends to demolish to allow settlement expansion.
The format does not matter. In The Hague, in an international forum that will be created for us, or perhaps even in our country: The day will come when not only Israeli politicians and military will be judged, but also lawyers, military and civilian judges, architects and planners, all who allowed and allowed the construction of this land in a penthouse for the Jews and a basement – divided into separate cells – for the Palestinians. May these words come forward that day, even if it's only a minute.
[ad_2]
Source link
