[ad_1]
Israeli telecommunications magnate Shaul Elovich, the controlling shareholder of telecommunications giant Bezeq and owner of the popular information website Walla reportedly acknowledged to police investigators on Tuesday that he was personally intervened to promote favorable coverage of Netanyahu. The family was questioned by the police during a corruption investigation dubbed "Case 4,000", centered on quid-pro's accusations. -which between the two offering regulatory concessions benefiting Bezeq in exchange for the positive media coverage of Netanyahu and his wife Sara by Walla .
A report by Channel 10 news after Elovitch is over Four-hour interrogation Tuesday said the telecommunications tycoon had admitted to calling the president and chief executive Walla Ilan Yeshua to have the contents of the news a "I could not ignore the pleas of Sara Netanyahu and the rest of the Netanyahu family." I did not want to irritate the Prime Minister. "Elovich reportedly told investigators:" What did you expect, that I would ignore these requests? "
Elovich however insisted that" he never expected favors in return. "
" I do not talk to Netanyahu about the benefits and there was no agreement on corruption, "Elovitch said, according to the report.
"
" Time and time again, we find that the rights of those questioned are flouted, which, again, is an illegal and distorted which we can not answer directly since the issue is under police surveillance. Of course, Mr. Elovitch denies the suspicions against him and does not think of corrupting the Prime Minister, "said lawyer Jack Chen in a statement.
Other reports about the Netanyahu's interrogation indicated that the prime minister had provided the bearers to show "huge" losses suffered by Bezeq during his tenure as minister of communications, when the so-called quid-counter-claim is suspected of having been struck.
Netanyahu also disputed claims that Walla coverage of him or his family at the time had been too favorable, claiming that 75 percent of the news on the site regarding his wife were critical He would also have shown textual messages to the police between Sara and Elovich's wife, in which the news site was "left-wing."
"If there was an agreement of corruption, why Sara Did not she write what she gave them? "According to the daily Yedioth Ahronoth a prime minister declared
that a statement issued on behalf of Netanyahu's family following the interrogation described the allegations of a quid-pro-quo agreement "without foundation"
[19659002"PrimeMinisterNetanyahuhasneverreachedanagreementwithElovichinexchangeforfavorablecoverage"thestatementsaidaddingthat"Wallahasalwaysprovidednegativecoverage"PrimeMinister
"This negative coverage has resulted in a flood of virulent articles on the eve of the 2015 elections, with the aim of persuading the public to vote against him." It's exactly the time when he is accused of having allegedly made [deal]"the statement said.
Netanyahu's interrogation on Tuesday was his fourth in" Case 4.000 "and tenth in a series of polls on corruption. During his interrogation, Netanyahu allegedly received evidence given to the police by the state's witness and former senior aide to the prime minister, Nir Hefetz, who allegedly showed Netanyahu and Elovich were fully aware that one Matching agreement was in progress, and Hefetz was talking with Elovitch six to seven times a day when he was serving as adviser to the Prime Minister.
Netanyahu said that "nothing new" Hefetz also provided the police with new element s evidence in two other cases of corruption against Netanyahu, including another involving an alleged violation of the law. Quid-pro-quo agreement with one of the country's leading newspapers in exchange for favorable coverage of the prime minister and his family.
In "Case 1,000" – – According to police, Netanyahu allegedly accepted about 1 million shekels ($ 280,000) of luxury gifts from several wealthy benefactors in exchange for favorable government treatment – Hefetz reportedly provided investigators with additional client names that seemed to reinforce suspicions.
In "Case 2000" – which is based on an alleged arrangement with publisher Yedioth Ahronoth Arnon Mozes to limit the circulation of the newspaper's main rival in exchange for a more favorable coverage – Hefetz reportedly provided the investigators the names of the extra numbers involved in In 1965, the police recommended that Netanyahu be charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust in both cases. "Case 1000" and "Case 2000"
Mounting cases fueled speculation Netanyahu might be forced to resign or trigger early elections, but he maintained his innocence and denounced all allegations against him as media and police.
See also:
Explanation of Netanyahu's Corruption Cases
Sara Netanyahu's Trial for Fraud Was Postponed for Three Months: Court
Explosive Texts Show Collusion Between judge and investigators in Bezeq case
Source link
