[ad_1]
Chris Froome (Team Sky) hailed the UCI's decision to drop its anti-doping procedures against him, calling it an "important moment for cycling". Froome returned an anti-doping sample containing twice the authorized limit of salbutamol to La Vuelta a España from last year, but he was free to run pending resolution of the case.
Related Articles
The UCI's lengthy statement Monday morning did not specify why he had dropped Froome, beyond noting that the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) had indicated that she "would accept, on the basis of the specific facts of the case, that the results of Mr. Froome's sample do not constitute an AAF [adverse badytical finding]."
"I am very pleased that the UCI has exonerated me, "said Froome in a statement issued by Team Sky." Although this decision is obviously a big problem for me and for the team, it is also an important moment for cycling, I understand the history of this great sport. bad, I've always taken my leadership position very seriously and I always do things right. I thought it when I said that I would never dishonor a winner's jersey and that my results would stand the test of time. "
The news of Froome's positive salbutamol collapsed in December, but the Briton ignored David Lapp's wish that he recuse himself from running until the case is resolved Froome won the Giro d'Italia in May and should now be a favorite for the Tour de France, although ASO officially tried to block his participation on the grounds that his presence would damage his reputation.
"I never doubted that this case would be dismissed for the simple reason that I knew it all along that I did not do anything wrong. I have suffered from asthma since childhood. I know exactly what are the rules regarding my asthma medications and I never use that my doctor to manage my symptoms within the allowed limits, "said Froome
UCI had to examine these test results from the Vuelta. Unfortunately, the details of the case did not remain confidential, as they should have done. And I appreciate more than anyone the frustration about the duration of the resolution of the case and the uncertainty that arises from it. I'm glad it's over.
"I am grateful for all the support I have received from the team and many fans around the world.The decision today draws a line.This means that we can all move forward and focus on the Tour de France. "
Brailsford
The anti-doping sample of Froome after the 18th stage of the Vuelta of last year contained 2000ng / ml of salbutamol , twice the allowed threshold of 1000ng. / ml. Froome stated that he had taken salbutamol by an oral inhaler to treat asthma and insisted that he had not exceeded the authorized dose of 1,600 mg in 24 hours. hours
According to WADA regulations, an athlete returns a positive test for a specific substance. Salbutamol has the opportunity to demonstrate that it has not exceeded the allowable dose by means of a controlled pharmacokinetic study. It is not known if Froome has undergone such tests.
"The elevation of Chris 's Salbutamol urine rate at stage 18 of the Vuelta was considered an" abnormal "baday result by the L' s. UCI and WADA provide further information.After a thorough review of this information, relevant data and scientific research, the UCI and WADA have concluded that there was, in fact, no AAF and that no rule was broken, "said Mr. Brailsford
. There are complex medical and physiological problems that affect the metabolism and excretion of Salbutamol. The same individual may have significant variations in test results taken over several days while using exactly the same amount of Salbutamol. This means that the level of Salbutamol in a single urine sample, alone, is not a reliable indicator of the amount inhaled.
"A review of all the results of Chris's 21 tests of the Vuelta revealed that the Brailsford result defended Team Sky's decision to put Froome on the field while the case was still going on, and stated that the professionalism, integrity and good grace under pressure of the runner have been exemplary and a credit to the sport. "If Team Sky was underwritten by the additional voluntary regulations of the Movement for a Credible Cycling, Froome does not have any. would not have been allowed to run during the procedure.
"We have always had total faith in Chris and his integrity.We knew that he had followed the right medical direction in managing his asthma at Vuelta and were sure that he would be exonerated. in the end, what it was, "said Brailsford. "That's why we decided that it was just for Chris to keep running, in accordance with the UCI rules, as the process was going on. We are happy that he had now been resolved. "
The Froome case was not the only blemish on Team Sky's reputation in recent months. In March, the report of the Parliamentary Committee on Doping in British Sport contained overwhelming criticism of the use of therapeutic use authorizations by Team Sky and expressed skepticism about the explanation of the team for the Jiffy Bag case, where a mystery package was delivered to Bradley Wiggins following the last stage of the 2011 Critérium du Dauphiné. "We believe that Team Sky has used drugs under the rules of AMA to improve the performance of runners, not just to address medical needs, "says the report.
"I have strong opinions about this report, if I'm honest about it," Brailsford told the BBC in June, but he has not yet presented a detailed rebuttal of its content.
Source link
