[ad_1]
The Supreme Court recalls that there is no correlation between vaccines and autism and therefore says "no" to the compensation claimed by a father for the child, sick after an injection (against diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, poliomyelitis, haemophilus influenzae hepatitis b) in 2001. The Court confirmed the provisions of the Court and the Court of Appeal of Naples
Autism: what we know today is one of the most mysterious disorders
Why "autism" is an improper term
Motivations
There are no "biological plausibility" of the relationship between the two events (vaccination and manifestation of the disease). In the case examined, in addition to reports on the state of the scientific literature on the subject, there were also totally negative specific reports (no admission or neurological examination for allergic reactions presumptive vaccines and autistic syndrome diagnosis by request at least 2 years later).
Vaccines, because they should not be scary
Are vaccines still needed, with improved sanitation?
The long story
How the "hoax" was born: Andrew Wakefield, a former English surgeon, published in 1998 on Lancet an article in which he supported the correlation, later denied by many other studies, between the trivalent vaccine against measles-mumps-rubella and autism. After the spread of his work, vaccination coverage in the United Kingdom increased from 90% to 70% and, as a result, measles cases, some of which are serious and even fatal, have increased. None of the subsequent research at Wakefield has ever highlighted a possible relationship between vaccines and autism. Not only that: it was discovered that the data published by the ex-doctor had been deliberately invented, for alleged economic interests
July 25, 2018 (modification July 25, 2018 | 18:11)
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[ad_2]
Source link
